|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Mar 8, 2017 15:15:36 GMT
tpfkar Typical disingenuous apologist whining on with technicalities in the futile but humorous scramble to bury an uncomfortable point. BAM, you're enlightened. She's Not a Christian!So no answer.
You got boring very quickly.
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Mar 8, 2017 15:29:55 GMT
|
|
|
Post by tickingmask on Mar 8, 2017 16:44:22 GMT
The majority of people in London voted against Brexit. Should the EU invade London, occupy it and claim ownership over it? No my solution was to enage in an armed campaign against British imperialism in Ireland in order to bring about the liberation of the Irish people from British rule. So then, going along with your analogy, are you saying that your solution for Brexiters in London is to engage in an armed campaign against the majority Remainers in order to ethnically cleanse them off the UK shores and ensure the racial purity of the Brexit community in the UK?
If that's not your solution then your analogy is a bit crap, really.
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Mar 8, 2017 18:09:50 GMT
The majority of people in London voted against Brexit. Should the EU invade London, occupy it and claim ownership over it? No my solution was to enage in an armed campaign against British imperialism in Ireland in order to bring about the liberation of the Irish people from British rule. So then, going along with your analogy, are you saying that your solution for Brexiters in London is to engage in an armed campaign against the majority Remainers in order to ethnically cleanse them off the UK shores and ensure the racial purity of the Brexit community in the UK?
If that's not your solution then your analogy is a bit crap, really.
Lmfao ethnically cleanse? What are you talking about? I dont want to "ethnically cleanse" unionists. Why would I want to "ethically cleanse" my own countrymen and women? Jim Allister or Ian Paisley are/were as Irish as Bobby Sands or Kieran Doherty.
|
|
|
Post by Edward-Elizabeth-Hitler on Mar 8, 2017 18:20:05 GMT
Gay marriage doesn't directly effect me either. I don't just see injustices where they directly effect me. But you having that sort of "I'm alright - screw everyone else" attitude explains a lot about things... And why aren't you trying to justify them not paying any tax or asking for exemptions from other laws? Or don't you see any sort of issu es with that? Where's your proof that religious people try to claim exemption from any laws? Please note that attempts don't harm you and don't count. What has homosexual "marriage" got to do with the discussion? Remember the bakery case in the US that got you all hot and bothered? Perfect example of religious people trying to claim exemption from laws.
|
|
|
Post by Edward-Elizabeth-Hitler on Mar 8, 2017 18:24:46 GMT
So then, going along with your analogy, are you saying that your solution for Brexiters in London is to engage in an armed campaign against the majority Remainers in order to ethnically cleanse them off the UK shores and ensure the racial purity of the Brexit community in the UK?
If that's not your solution then your analogy is a bit crap, really.
Lmfao ethnically cleanse? What are you talking about? I dont want to "ethnically cleanse" unionists. Why would I want to "ethically cleanse" my own countrymen and women? Jim Allister or Ian Paisley are/were as Irish as Bobby Sands or Kieran Doherty. Er, you'd be fighting against and killing unionists, you utter moron.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Mar 8, 2017 18:24:55 GMT
Where's your proof that religious people try to claim exemption from any laws? Please note that attempts don't harm you and don't count. What has homosexual "marriage" got to do with the discussion? Remember the bakery case in the US that got you all hot and bothered? Perfect example of religious people trying to claim exemption from laws. And they should have been exempt from the laws.
|
|
|
Post by Edward-Elizabeth-Hitler on Mar 8, 2017 18:26:09 GMT
Remember the bakery case in the US that got you all hot and bothered? Perfect example of religious people trying to claim exemption from laws. And they should have been exempt from the laws. Yeah, their beliefs are more important than the civil rights of others. Good one.
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Mar 8, 2017 18:27:47 GMT
Remember the bakery case in the US that got you all hot and bothered? Perfect example of religious people trying to claim exemption from laws. And they should have been exempt from the laws. Would that include murdering customers, and baking them to make meat pies? Because I would be cool with that.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Mar 8, 2017 18:28:35 GMT
And they should have been exempt from the laws. Yeah, their beliefs are more important than the civil rights of others. Good one. Civil rights doesn't include making wedding cakes for sexual perverts.
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Mar 8, 2017 18:30:29 GMT
Lmfao ethnically cleanse? What are you talking about? I dont want to "ethnically cleanse" unionists. Why would I want to "ethically cleanse" my own countrymen and women? Jim Allister or Ian Paisley are/were as Irish as Bobby Sands or Kieran Doherty. Er, you'd be fighting against and killing unionists, you utter moron. No sh't. A revolution is not a bed of roses.
|
|
|
Post by Edward-Elizabeth-Hitler on Mar 8, 2017 18:30:32 GMT
Yeah, their beliefs are more important than the civil rights of others. Good one. Civil rights doesn't include making wedding cakes for sexual perverts. Actually, according to the laws of your country and your definition of sexual perverts, it does. Sucks to be you I guess.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2017 18:30:39 GMT
One person's pervert is another person's best friend and partner...
Just sayin'...
|
|
|
Post by Edward-Elizabeth-Hitler on Mar 8, 2017 18:31:29 GMT
Yeah, their beliefs are more important than the civil rights of others. Good one. Civil rights doesn't include making wedding cakes for sexual perverts. Just out of interest ErJen, would you support the right of a doctor to refuse to treat a homosexual?
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Mar 8, 2017 18:32:42 GMT
Where's your proof that religious people try to claim exemption from any laws? Please note that attempts don't harm you and don't count. What has homosexual "marriage" got to do with the discussion? Remember the bakery case in the US that got you all hot and bothered? Perfect example of religious people trying to claim exemption from laws. There was a time here in the US when the same reasoning behind the push for gay discrimination was used against Catholics. Same approach to the topic (they're evil, it's anti-Biblical, etc.), same devices, same everything.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Mar 8, 2017 18:33:33 GMT
Civil rights doesn't include making wedding cakes for sexual perverts. Just out of interest ErJen, would you support the right of a doctor to refuse to treat a homosexual? No, I wouldn't, and you look silly for even asking that question. Better luck next time.
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Mar 8, 2017 18:34:00 GMT
Civil rights doesn't include making wedding cakes for sexual perverts. Just out of interest ErJen, would you support the right of a doctor to refuse to treat a homosexual? "Have you considered the fact that they're bringing it on themselves?"
|
|
|
Post by Edward-Elizabeth-Hitler on Mar 8, 2017 18:36:26 GMT
Just out of interest ErJen, would you support the right of a doctor to refuse to treat a homosexual? No, I wouldn't, and you look silly for even asking that question. Better luck next time. Why not, given you support the rights of others to withhold their services from people purely based on their sexual orientation?
|
|
|
Post by Edward-Elizabeth-Hitler on Mar 8, 2017 18:37:08 GMT
Just out of interest ErJen, would you support the right of a doctor to refuse to treat a homosexual? "Have you considered the fact that they're bringing it on themselves?" Ah yes, in a thread with a title mocking erjen's claim there was no such thing as homophobia.
|
|
|
Post by tickingmask on Mar 8, 2017 20:09:01 GMT
Lmfao ethnically cleanse? Uhhhhh, yes. Any solution to enage in an armed campaign against the political will of the majority of people living in your community requires an ethnic cleansing program to remove them in order to give you what you want. Otherwise, if you thought you could persuade them to change to your way of thinking, then why would you engage in an armed campaign in the first place? I thought you terrorist sympathisers understood something as basic as this. Don't you usually try to justify it by dehumanising your 'enemy' and pretending they are not part of your community?
|
|