|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Feb 22, 2018 15:19:59 GMT
The individual who was 'stabbed' received his wound to the foot So he may have been maimed for life and possibly unable to ever walk again. No, that isn't possible, the individual in question is a fictional character. Do you always have this much trouble separating fantasy from reality? |
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 22, 2018 16:01:03 GMT
Is DC-Fanboy still having difficulty wrapping his head around the concept of a technologically advanced society that differs from the civic standards of our current western civilization?
What a limited mind.
Imagine how dull science fiction would be if superior technology meant a civilization had to be benign and enlightened in all things.
Everyone else in this thread gets it.
Another EPIC FAIL by Always Wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Feb 22, 2018 16:47:11 GMT
Is DC-Fanboy still having difficulty wrapping his head around the concept of a technologically advanced society that differs from the civic standards of our current western civilization? What a limited mind. Imagine how dull science fiction would be if superior technology meant a civilization had to be benign and enlightened in all things. Everyone else in this thread gets it. Another EPIC FAIL by Always Wrong. You have to feel sorry for DC Fan. He appears to be genuinely developmentally disabled. I assume his caretaker(s) allow him time on the internet because it’s safer than him acting out in the real world. His mission to discredit MCU films as the products of murders and hate mongers psychotic and paranoid . The MCU and its fans are his external tormentors. His approach is sloppy this time out. It’s desperate and flailing. Usually he would have waited for the BP weekend drop off or for the hype to die down a bit before going on the offensive. Wonder Woman’s loss of status has obviously effected him deeply. His ranting is much more disorganized and confused. He’s like a serial killer in the “frenzy” stage. |
|
|
|
Post by RedDeadFallout on Feb 23, 2018 14:12:51 GMT
Its part of their culture, so who cares? In America our presidency is rigged by the rich and powerful so What's to say we are any better? In America, we don't have that same barbaric craving to see blood spilled and human life taken like Wakandans do. No you just have a leader with serious mental health issues and hate black people. |
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Feb 23, 2018 15:21:11 GMT
Its part of their culture, so who cares? In America our presidency is rigged by the rich and powerful so What's to say we are any better? In America, we don't have that same barbaric craving to see blood spilled and human life taken like Wakandans do. You realise just how easy it is to prove you wrong right? I mean seriously America is not blood thirsty? dude that's just not event remotely true.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Feb 23, 2018 15:29:27 GMT
In America, we don't have that same barbaric craving to see blood spilled and human life taken like Wakandans do. You realise just how easy it is to prove you wrong right? I mean seriously America is not blood thirsty? dude that's just not event remotely true.
Let him think that. For every lie he tells Black Panther makes another million dollars. There’s a direct correlation to his lies and the Panther’s Box Office. He’s Marvel’s antagonistic mascot. :-) Hey DC-Fan - we’re headed for a one hundred million dollar weekend. You’re in charge of the half time show. |
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Feb 23, 2018 15:36:12 GMT
You realise just how easy it is to prove you wrong right? I mean seriously America is not blood thirsty? dude that's just not event remotely true.
Hey DC-Fan - we’re headed for a one hundred million dollar weekend. You’re in charge of the half time show. It will consist of him in the middle of a field, dressed as Wonder Woman, giving an interpretive dance about Wonder Woman, 5 minutes of which will consist of him spinning around, arms outstretched shouting "Wonder Woman, Wonder Woman, Wonder Woman..." It will instantly be considered by him the greatest interpretive dance performance based on a CBM, and many times better than any about the MCU, despite having never seen one. If the critics rate it higher than any MCU one it is officially the greatest. If the public rate it higher than any MCU one it is officially the greatest. If it is rated the highest by neither, it never happened. |
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Feb 23, 2018 15:46:57 GMT
You realise just how easy it is to prove you wrong right? I mean seriously America is not blood thirsty? dude that's just not event remotely true.
Let him think that. For every lie he tells Black Panther makes another million dollars. There’s a direct correlation to his lies and the Panther’s Box Office. He’s Marvel’s antagonistic mascot. :-) Hey DC-Fan - we’re headed for a one hundred million dollar weekend. You’re in charge of the half time show. The thing that makes me laugh is he hones in on the bloodthirsty and savage thing but he fails to identify what sounds like are valid criticism of the film in other regards, the unbridled rage video by Mauler does this, some of which I disagree with other parts he has a valid point, some are just silly nit picks but as someone who can be nitpicky about silly shit I get it but also find it funny, none of which will likely lower my enjoyment of the film when I can finally get around to seeing it, but DC-Fans utterly shallow and borderline offensive issue with the film is just absurd.
Also don't trust him with the halftime show, Sostie is giving him too much credit the half-time show will consist of DC-Fan tossing off onto a copy of Wonder Woman whilst wearing a Batman cowl and a Superman suit whilst he recites the Green Lantern oath, which he wont finish saying before he spews over the dvd and wipes it off with his cape, he'll then shove a replica trident up his arse and walk away wearing mismatched Flash & Cyborg slippers whilst singing in off key tone the song from Suicide Squad.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 25, 2018 14:25:56 GMT
As a matter of interest please name one King in England who gained the throne through man to man combat with the current king? In medieval England, it was common for Kings to lead their armies into battle. In 1485, both Richard III and Henry Tudor fought at the Battle of Bosworth Field. Richard III became the last English King to be killed in battle and Henry Tudor won the throne and became Henry VII. You truly are a fucking idiot. Beheading your wife for infidelity was NOT a tradition. It was a tradition during the time of Henry VIII. He beheaded 2 of his wives on the charge of infidelity (although only 1 of the 2 was actually guilty of infidelity). "Traditions" are passed from one generation to the next. They cease to be traditions when there is a 500 year gap.  |
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Feb 25, 2018 16:24:34 GMT
Keep on telling me that America isn't bloodthirsty or barbaric. Tell me that there hasn't been any conservatives or even liberals that haven't demanded bloodshed! The United States of America is just as bloodthirsty and barbaric as any other country, real or fake. Well, when the 2000 Presidential election was disputed, I don't recall anyone blood being shed to settle that dispute. The dispute was settled peacefully without any bloodshed. Yet Wakanda, which is supposedly a technologically advanced nation, still cant' figure out in the 21st century a peaceful way to settle a political dispute and still resort to uncivilized barbaric savagery to settle a simple political dispute. What the fuck does the 2000 election have to do with anything? You said that the United States of America wasn't blood thristy, which is completely bullshit! |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Feb 26, 2018 6:13:12 GMT
Well, when the 2000 Presidential election was disputed, I don't recall anyone blood being shed to settle that dispute. The dispute was settled peacefully without any bloodshed. Yet Wakanda, which is supposedly a technologically advanced nation, still cant' figure out in the 21st century a peaceful way to settle a political dispute and still resort to uncivilized barbaric savagery to settle a simple political dispute. What the fuck does the 2000 election have to do with anything? You said that the United States of America wasn't blood thristy, which is completely bullshit! The US settles their leadership disputes by peaceful methods and don't settle their leadership disputes by barbaric and savage bloodshed and taking of human life like Wakanda does. |
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Feb 26, 2018 6:35:41 GMT
What the fuck does the 2000 election have to do with anything? You said that the United States of America wasn't blood thristy, which is completely bullshit! The US settles their leadership disputes by peaceful methods and don't settle their leadership disputes by barbaric and savage bloodshed and taking of human life like Wakanda does. Yeah... about Alexander Hamilton... |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Feb 26, 2018 6:47:25 GMT
The US settles their leadership disputes by peaceful methods and don't settle their leadership disputes by barbaric and savage bloodshed and taking of human life like Wakanda does. Yeah... about Alexander Hamilton... That was in the 18th century. This is the 21st century and technologically advanced nations in the 21st century don't to resort to barbaric and savage bloddshed and taking of human life to settle leadership disputes like Wakanda does. |
|
|
|
Post by Vassaggo on Feb 26, 2018 6:53:31 GMT
Yeah... about Alexander Hamilton... That was in the 18th century. This is the 21st century and technologically advanced nations in the 21st century don't to resort to barbaric and savage bloddshed and taking of human life to settle leadership disputes like Wakanda does. Man, I am so disappointed this is the hill you are going to die on. I was hoping for a more enthusiastic, original troll. Not this banal tack. |
|
|
|
Post by Nicko's Nose on Feb 26, 2018 6:59:40 GMT
What the fuck does the 2000 election have to do with anything? You said that the United States of America wasn't blood thristy, which is completely bullshit! The US settles their leadership disputes by peaceful methods and don't settle their leadership disputes by barbaric and savage bloodshed and taking of human life like Wakanda does. Once again talking about a movie like it’s real life...  |
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Feb 26, 2018 8:47:29 GMT
That was in the 18th century. This is the 21st century and technologically advanced nations in the 21st century don't to resort to barbaric and savage bloddshed and taking of human life to settle leadership disputes like Wakanda does. Man, I am so disappointed this is the hill you are going to die on. I was hoping for a more enthusiastic, original troll. Not this banal tack. Really why? DC-Fan is far from original, he's a parrot who simply restates others issues without understanding the actual context of them, this is why when you challenge his argument he can do nothing but regurgitate the same flaccid argument over and over ad nauseam, to expect more is to expect a dog not to lick it's own scrotum, in either case they both bring about the same amount of class and decorum to a civilised argument. |
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Feb 26, 2018 9:03:16 GMT
Yeah... about Alexander Hamilton... That was in the 18th century. This is the 21st century and technologically advanced nations in the 21st century don't to resort to barbaric and savage bloddshed and taking of human life to settle leadership disputes like Wakanda does. Except where in the film was the taking of a life a requirement to take control? Killmonger was recognised as king despite T'Challa still being alive, T'Challa specifically asked and allowed M'Baku to yield in their fight, T'Challa even asked that Killmonger allow him to save his life, meaning T'Challa won and Killmonger didn't need to die, killing can occur but it's not a necessity, so by saying they resort to it is a lie, a factual statement would be "This is the 21st century and technologically advanced nations in the 21st century don't to for single combat where the taking of human life can in extreme circumstances occur to be used to settle leadership disputes like Wakanda does.".
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Feb 26, 2018 12:08:40 GMT
Yeah... about Alexander Hamilton... That was in the 18th century. This is the 21st century and technologically advanced nations in the 21st century don't to resort to barbaric and savage bloddshed and taking of human life to settle leadership disputes like Wakanda does. They don't have a real God that told them to do so either. |
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Feb 26, 2018 12:18:32 GMT
What the fuck does the 2000 election have to do with anything? You said that the United States of America wasn't blood thristy, which is completely bullshit! The US settles their leadership disputes by peaceful methods and don't settle their leadership disputes by barbaric and savage bloodshed and taking of human life like Wakanda does. I guess that’s how Jackie Kennedy ended up with her husband’s brains in her lap. Very peacefully. |
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Feb 26, 2018 12:24:20 GMT
That was in the 18th century. This is the 21st century and technologically advanced nations in the 21st century don't to resort to barbaric and savage bloddshed and taking of human life to settle leadership disputes like Wakanda does. Except where in the film was the taking of a life a requirement to take control? Killmonger was recognised as king despite T'Challa still being alive, T'Challa specifically asked and allowed M'Baku to yield in their fight, T'Challa even asked that Killmonger allow him to save his life, meaning T'Challa won and Killmonger didn't need to die, killing can occur but it's not a necessity, so by saying they resort to it is a lie, a factual statement would be "This is the 21st century and technologically advanced nations in the 21st century don't to for single combat where the taking of human life can in extreme circumstances occur to be used to settle leadership disputes like Wakanda does.".
After seeing the film three times, it is abundantly clear that the challenge is not a fight to the death. It’s a challenge that will end when one person yields or IF death occurs. It’s not intended to be a fight to the death. It’s a challenge to determine who is the better warrior. |
|
