blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Mar 1, 2017 19:24:38 GMT
Scientists like all people are wrong sometimes. That's correct which means that some science is wrong, which means that some science is not science, which means that some dumbasses will believe anything such as that human beings are causing the Earth's climate to change. The fact that they're not careful who they listen to and believe is why they're called dumbasses.
I actually laughed out loud.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Mar 1, 2017 19:22:29 GMT
Asmr is sexual? lol
Go hump someone else's leg for attention.
Of course it is you dirty old man. Perhaps you care to explain what other stimulation a 50 year old man gets from watching videos of young attractive teenage girls whispering to him. Link? No? Didn't think so.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Mar 1, 2017 19:09:05 GMT
We aren't allowed to state the truth now? They are perverse. Yeah calling someone perverse when engaging in sexually defiant behaviour yourself is the height of hypocrisy Blade. Or do you think ASMR is a normal sexual activity for most Christians? Nothing freaky about that at all
Asmr is sexual? lol
Go hump someone else's leg for attention.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Mar 1, 2017 19:04:24 GMT
"Scientists are idiots." Do you mean all of them or just some of them? Scientists like all people are wrong sometimes.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Mar 1, 2017 18:28:23 GMT
Ooh, don't be harsh, dear. We aren't allowed to state the truth now? They are perverse.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Mar 1, 2017 18:27:33 GMT
Is Jenner perverse for being transgender or for being a lesbian?
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Mar 1, 2017 17:40:38 GMT
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Mar 1, 2017 16:59:53 GMT
Yes many serial killers start out that way.[harming and killing animals]
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Mar 1, 2017 16:50:46 GMT
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 22:07:59 GMT
If you understood the OP then why did you ask for data, when I posted an opinion article?
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 22:04:12 GMT
So did you not read the two short lines of the OP or did you not understand them? Which is it eddy?
There's something wrong with you... really. You literally quoted my answer. If you understood the OP then why did you ask for data, when I posted an opinion article?
Now did you not understand the OP or did you not read it?
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 21:52:58 GMT
So did you not read the two short lines of the OP or did you not understand them? I read them and understood that you were baiting for outrage... ... or you were too dim to understand he was incorrect and needed input from greater acumen. Which is it?
So did you not read the two short lines of the OP or did you not understand them? Which is it eddy?
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 20:13:08 GMT
I have a terrible character flaw; I almost always assume a person means exactly what they say. Actually it does, when it's the state doing the calling.
Right, that's why you worded it just like that.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 20:02:38 GMT
Calling it marriage doesn't make it marriage. Actually it does, when it's the state doing the calling.Yes and you knew exactly what I meant.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 19:55:14 GMT
Marriage is between a man and woman. Actually it isn't. Plenty of guys marry guys, and girls marry girls. Not a big student of history, I take it? Calling it marriage doesn't make it marriage.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 19:53:39 GMT
Because at the time I said it I had not carefully read the entire article through and thought about each part of it in detail. So it was possible that there would be elements of truth within it which I had not yet found. Having carefully read it, however, I see that there are not, except in the sense I just referred to.
Well I disagree. I think there are some truths in the article. There are also some parts of the article that are incorrect.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 19:20:06 GMT
I answered that in the post you quoted. "So honestly, no, I cannot find a single element of truth in that entire article. Just a couple of sentences here and there that one could take as true... if, and only if, one interpreted them to mean something other than what the author means by them." Then why did you say one "might" find some truth? To me that means someone didn't read it thoroughly.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 19:19:16 GMT
I answered that in the post you quoted. "So honestly, no, I cannot find a single element of truth in that entire article. Just a couple of sentences here and there that one could take as true... if, and only if, one interpreted them to mean something other than what the author means by them." Then why did you say one "might" find some truth?
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 19:14:37 GMT
So one might find them or there might be some truth?
Cause I see some truth in the article. Such as? Not so far. Certainly the premise of the article - that gays are, as a group, "angry" people, is entirely unsupported by evidence. And appears to me to be simply flat wrong. I've known many gay people in my life, and whilst of course they have all experienced anger in their lives (who hasn't?), I don't recall ever meeting one that I'd call an angry person. Given the absurdity of the premise, the reasoning supporting it naturally has to be nonsensical, and it generally is. The author writes from the point of view that homosexuality is inherently bad or wrong, and therefore states that gay people are essentially angry because they want to live lives based on wrongness. But that homosexuality is bad or wrong is mere presumption on his part, rather than the basic truth he appears to think it is. Again, this presumption is never supported in the text - it's merely taken as a given. The suggestion that god smote New Orleans with a hurricane because of gays is, of course, so ridiculous that it barely merits discussion. As does the idea that god destroys societies because of the presence of homosexuality. He does say "gays are people first". He uses it in the sense of "...so don't treat them badly because they are so evil", though, so I couldn't call it an honest sentiment as such. But I can get behind that statement if one took it at face value. Similarly, he says "And we should have compassion on anyone who is having a problem in this life." Again, he means it in the sense of "gayness being their problem", which makes the statement false. But I would agree with the sentence as a literal statement of truth. He goes on to support the existence of "ex gay" people and "gay conversion". The first is imaginary and the second is one of the active evils of the world which harms many thousands of people. So honestly, no, I cannot find a single element of truth in that entire article. Just a couple of sentences here and there that one could take as true... if, and only if, one interpreted them to mean something other than what the author means by them.
So did you mean one "might" find them or there "might" be some truth?
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 18:56:31 GMT
So there is some truth in the article. Thank you for your honesty. Do you not understand what the word "might" means? So one might find them or there might be some truth?
Cause I see some truth in the article. I'm sure you do too.
|
|