blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 18:48:57 GMT
He isn't correct. Careful analysis might find one or two points, but honestly at first glance it seemed to me that every single thing in the article is wrong. Frankly, I doubt his honesty. So there is some truth in the article. Thank you for your honesty.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 18:39:36 GMT
This was written by a Mormon a few years ago. Is he correct? No he isn't. Well, that was easy. Irony aside - if I were gay, that article would make me angry... He isn't what? Are you saying there is no truth at all in this article?
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 18:38:02 GMT
Do you have any evidence to support that Steve? Since you went there it goes both ways. The evidence is in the article itself. The author makes negative statements about homosexuals and offers no evidence. He makes assumptions and generalizations based on his own prejudices. It is very critical and derogatory and shows an obvious prejudice against gay people. Funny cause I read the article and there was nothing homophobic or bigoted. So I'll be waiting on that evidence.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 18:13:13 GMT
Almost everyone here knows you think he's correct, including you. You ain't foolin' anyone, fartwaffle. So did you not read the two short lines of the OP or did you not understand them?
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 18:12:16 GMT
No, he is not correct. The entire premise of the article is faulty. Gay people aren't any angrier than straight people and they get angry for the same reasons as any other person does. The idea that gay people are angry "because of the fact that they ended up “gay” and they are angry at who caused them to end up in this condition" is ridiculous and the author of the article does nothing to prove or back this up. The author claims that "gays will always fight for social acceptance because deep down they don’t accept themselves" but offers no evidence to support this ridiculous notion. The article is extremely bigoted and homophobic and poorly written. It is full of assumptions which are not proven or supported in any way. A very dishonest article. Do you have any evidence to support that Steve? Since you went there it goes both ways.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 18:08:30 GMT
Do you agree there is no data to even begin to qualify his speculations? Knowing this do you not know it is impossible for him to be either correct or incorrect, other than the errant fallacy of using unverified assumptions to form hypotheses? BTW, in spite of this everyone knows you think he's correct, monkeyspanker.
When did I claim to have data idiot?
I posted an article written by a single person.. making it obvious that it was an opinion piece. Then I even asked "is he correct?" Making it clear that I knew there was the possibility he could be wrong.
You made another knee jerk response and couldn't read the two lines of the OP. Classic eddy-syndrome.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 17:55:56 GMT
The link is right in the first post.
Incorrect. There is a link in the first post that merely asserts the same premise. Classic straw man. Can neither you nor your link provide some data in lieu of feces?
Is he correct?
What about this question do you need explained?
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 17:47:22 GMT
many gays are so angry.LINK?
Is your "condition" flaring up again? The link is right in the first post.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 17:43:00 GMT
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 28, 2017 16:55:24 GMT
Marriage is between a man and woman. That's what marriage has always meant.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 27, 2017 21:53:34 GMT
You did bully them for giving your opinion. that is what i said. In this post you said that such an act is bullying and that is what i pointed out. No. I just started a rhetorical thread where i posted a stupid comment while drunk. Do i need to apologize? I will if you tell me.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 27, 2017 21:39:23 GMT
I don't doubt it.
incidentally did you know that AJ June admitted to murdering a defenseless house cat when he was younger? Do we really need people like that as mods? I don't think we do, it's scary having an unbalanced person like that as a mod.
He did? Holy Cow! Yes indeed. Notice that he hasn't denied it yet or claimed I'm lying.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 27, 2017 21:33:01 GMT
AJ the crazy-mod-concern-troll shows up. They are probably PMing him begging him to ban me. Pathetic cretins I don't doubt it.
incidentally did you know that AJ June admitted to murdering a defenseless house cat when he was younger? Do we really need people like that as mods? I don't think we do, it's scary having an unbalanced person like that as a mod.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 27, 2017 21:28:39 GMT
AJ the crazy-mod-concern-troll shows up.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 27, 2017 21:12:59 GMT
a video of it would be better.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 27, 2017 21:03:10 GMT
So what? What are you going to do about it? Nothing Thank you for being a voice of reason on this board Trump. People should follow your example and look up to you. I know that I will. Thank you for your time sir.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 27, 2017 20:55:35 GMT
but by voting no they still technically voted lol That's why it's funny.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 27, 2017 20:33:58 GMT
Can they marry themselves?
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 27, 2017 20:29:15 GMT
Let's learn what a straw man argument is sam.
Straw man A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument which was not advanced by that opponent.
So you see when you said that "people used religion to justify being against interracial marriage" that wasn't anything I even made a claim about. So that would make your argument a straw man in addition to you being a dumbass and a liar. [wave]
You have a healthy and a happy Sammy boy.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Feb 27, 2017 20:12:18 GMT
So no, Sam can't back up his lie that "God said mixing races is bad"
He's exposed as a liar again.
Do a google search you idiot. People used religion to justify being against interracial marriage, it's a historical fact. God nor the bible ever said mixing races was bad you drooling idiot.
People used religion to justify being against interracial marriage, it's a historical fact.
Strawman argument gramps.
|
|