|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Nov 17, 2017 11:57:04 GMT
Actually they've all been good. It's a great time to be a Marvel fan. There's so much good stuff. I mean freaking Punisher is out this week, we just had Ragnarok, Spidery was awesome, Guardians 2 was super good, Panther looks awesome in February, and then fucking Infinity War.
It's just so amusing by contrast how DC has produced 4 out of 5 duds. I mean WTF are they doing?
That's complete nonsense. Two thirds have been dreadful. I mean freaking Punisher is out this week,
So unlike JL you are ignoring the awful reviews that Punisher is getting. lolol, nope, they've actually all been good, and most have been really good.
And it looks like Punisher is doing fine with reviews. Vast majority are positive and most of the negatives say it's too violent, which is actually a positive.
|
|
chasallnut
Sophomore
@chasallnut
Posts: 506
Likes: 158
 
|
Post by chasallnut on Nov 17, 2017 12:08:42 GMT
Actually they've all been good.
That's complete nonsense. Two thirds have been dreadful. I mean freaking Punisher is out this week,
So unlike JL you are ignoring the awful reviews that Punisher is getting. lolol, nope, they've actually all been good, and most have been really good.
And it looks like Punisher is doing fine with reviews. Vast majority are positive and most of the negatives say it's too violent, which is actually a positive.
lolol...oh dear, that aside, if that's what you believe good for you. IMO Thor 1 and 2 are dire, IronMan 2 and 3 are poor. Those examples equal two thirds. AOU, poor etc etc So yes you are ignoring the awful reviews. By the way I am hoping Punisher rocks and I will make my judgement after I have watched it, starting this evening. But you are happy to use poor reviews when it suits you and ignore them when it doesn't, all that without actually having seen them. |
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Nov 17, 2017 12:38:03 GMT
lolol, nope, they've actually all been good, and most have been really good.
And it looks like Punisher is doing fine with reviews. Vast majority are positive and most of the negatives say it's too violent, which is actually a positive.
lolol...oh dear, that aside, you should see his "LOLOLOLOLOL". This one the epitome of a passive aggressive bully with low effort thinking capacity.
It's his nature. The Punisher is at 67% or 6.6 average on RT and 56 % on Metacritic - that is terrible for a TV show. Most high profile ones are in the 90s.
Granted it's not > 10% Inhumans bad, but MCU really had a string of horribly lowest rated shows this year beginning with Ironfist, Defenders (lowest Netflix viewership), Inhumans and now Punisher.
Still, have fun watching it.
|
|
chasallnut
Sophomore
@chasallnut
Posts: 506
Likes: 158
|
Post by chasallnut on Nov 17, 2017 12:48:31 GMT
lolol...oh dear, that aside, you should see his "LOLOLOLOLOL". This one the epitome of a passive aggressive bully with low effort thinking capacity.
It's his nature. The Punisher is at 67% or 6.6 average on RT and 56 % on Metacritic - that is terrible for a TV show. Most high profile ones are in the 90s.
Granted it's not > 10% Inhumans bad, but MCU really had a string of horribly lowest rated shows this year beginning with Ironfist, Defenders (lowest Netflix viewership), Inhumans and now Punisher.
Still, have fun watching it.
Anyone that uses lol, lolol etc should really stop wearing big pants. I loved both series of Daredevil, and loved the way they did the Punisher, which is why I am looking forward this series. I really enjoyed Jessica Jones (though it dragged a little at the end) but Luke Cage was very average and Iron Fist, well that was just puerile crap. I enjoyed the Defenders, on a par with Jessica Jones but hated the IronFist character and the lump that played him. |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Nov 17, 2017 12:50:20 GMT
lolol, nope, they've actually all been good, and most have been really good.
And it looks like Punisher is doing fine with reviews. Vast majority are positive and most of the negatives say it's too violent, which is actually a positive.
lolol...oh dear, that aside, if that's what you believe good for you. IMO Thor 1 and 2 are dire, IronMan 2 and 3 are poor. Those examples equal two thirds. AOU, poor etc etc So yes you are ignoring the awful reviews. By the way I am hoping Punisher rocks and I will make my judgement after I have watched it, starting this evening. But you are happy to use poor reviews when it suits you and ignore them when it doesn't, all that without actually having seen them. Well you're wrong.
Average DCU RT Score 47. Lowest MCU film 66. Average MCU film 84.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Nov 17, 2017 12:55:24 GMT
you should see his "LOLOLOLOLOL". This one the epitome of a passive aggressive bully with low effort thinking capacity.
It's his nature. The Punisher is at 67% or 6.6 average on RT and 56 % on Metacritic - that is terrible for a TV show. Most high profile ones are in the 90s.
Granted it's not > 10% Inhumans bad, but MCU really had a string of horribly lowest rated shows this year beginning with Ironfist, Defenders (lowest Netflix viewership), Inhumans and now Punisher.
Still, have fun watching it.
Anyone that uses lol, lolol etc should really stop wearing big pants. I loved both series of Daredevil, and loved the way they did the Punisher, which is why I am looking forward this series. I really enjoyed Jessica Jones (though it dragged a little at the end) but Luke Cage was very average and Iron Fist, well that was just puerile crap. I enjoyed the Defenders, on a par with Jessica Jones but hated the IronFist character and the lump that played him. Fair enough. Feed that echo chamber-dwelling bully of a passive-agressive ignoramus the numbers and ratings I provided, would be fun to see his absurd reaction, like the robots in Westworld when seeing something their brains were not programmed to understand: IGNORE. What he does with me entirely btw. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 17, 2017 13:14:17 GMT
Yeah, but that's because it was Jackman's Swan Song so they went easy on it. Well it's true, if Jackman hasn't said it wasn't his last time in the role and if they hadn't killed him in the end the films' flaws would've been more focused on. Instead they ignored them all out of respect for this being his last time in the role. |
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Nov 17, 2017 13:18:07 GMT
Well it's true, if Jackman hasn't said it wasn't his last time in the role and if they hadn't killed him in the end the films' flaws would've been more focused on. Instead they ignored them all out of respect for this being his last time in the role. Proof? |
|
chasallnut
Sophomore
@chasallnut
Posts: 506
Likes: 158
|
Post by chasallnut on Nov 17, 2017 13:19:37 GMT
Well it's true, if Jackman hasn't said it wasn't his last time in the role and if they hadn't killed him in the end the films' flaws would've been more focused on. Instead they ignored them all out of respect for this being his last time in the role. You really have an issue with the definitions of the words "true" and "fact". None of that is truth it is speculation. And you have been banging the speculation drum incessantly because that is the only way you can actually deny the stats, you know the "real data". |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 17, 2017 13:21:50 GMT
Well it's true, if Jackman hasn't said it wasn't his last time in the role and if they hadn't killed him in the end the films' flaws would've been more focused on. Instead they ignored them all out of respect for this being his last time in the role. And you have been banging the speculation drum incessantly because that is the only way you can actually deny the stats, you know the "real data". No, I just know that "Last Time" performances typically get a easier time and their flaws ignored. |
|
chasallnut
Sophomore
@chasallnut
Posts: 506
Likes: 158
|
Post by chasallnut on Nov 17, 2017 13:24:32 GMT
lolol, nope, they've actually all been good, and most have been really good.
lolol...oh dear, that aside, if that's what you believe good for you. IMO Thor 1 and 2 are dire, IronMan 2 and 3 are poor. Those examples equal two thirds. AOU, poor etc etc So yes you are ignoring the awful reviews. By the way I am hoping Punisher rocks and I will make my judgement after I have watched it, starting this evening. But you are happy to use poor reviews when it suits you and ignore them when it doesn't, all that without actually having seen them. Well you're wrong.
Average DCU RT Score 47. Lowest MCU film 66. Average MCU film 84.
It's funny that when those type of figures are used against your opinions, for example BB, TDK and TDKR against the Cap films that showed that the Batman films had much better scores, suddenly those stats don't count. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 17, 2017 13:25:31 GMT
Well you're wrong.
Average DCU RT Score 47. Lowest MCU film 66. Average MCU film 84.
It's funny that when those type of figures are used against your opinions, for example BB, TDK and TDKR against the Cap films that showed that the Batman films had much better scores, suddenly those stats don't count. The Dark Knight movies had their artificial boosts, though. |
|
chasallnut
Sophomore
@chasallnut
Posts: 506
Likes: 158
|
Post by chasallnut on Nov 17, 2017 13:26:03 GMT
And you have been banging the speculation drum incessantly because that is the only way you can actually deny the stats, you know the "real data". No, I just know that "Last Time" performances typically get a easier time and their flaws ignored. So now you know?? When are you going to invent the cure for cancer? Seriously though, Superman IV: The Quest for Peace. yeah that did so well in Reeve's swansong. You are talking utter tosh. |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Nov 17, 2017 13:27:52 GMT
Well you're wrong.
Average DCU RT Score 47. Lowest MCU film 66. Average MCU film 84.
It's funny that when those type of figures are used against your opinions, for example BB, TDK and TDKR against the Cap films that showed that the Batman films had much better scores, suddenly those stats don't count. You really don't see the difference.
Those scores were close and reasonable arguments can me made, and also I don't deny that TDK series is fucking great and I have no problem with somebody calling it better. But a case can be made that cap is.
Here it's not even close.
See the difference yet?
|
|
chasallnut
Sophomore
@chasallnut
Posts: 506
Likes: 158
|
Post by chasallnut on Nov 17, 2017 13:29:04 GMT
It's funny that when those type of figures are used against your opinions, for example BB, TDK and TDKR against the Cap films that showed that the Batman films had much better scores, suddenly those stats don't count. The Dark Knight movies had their artificial boosts, though.  |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 17, 2017 13:29:32 GMT
No, I just know that "Last Time" performances typically get a easier time and their flaws ignored. So now you know?? When are you going to invent the cure for cancer? Seriously though, Superman IV: The Quest for Peace. yeah that did so well in Reeve's swansong. You are talking utter tosh. Superman IV wasn't marketed and promoted and based around it being his last time in the Super-Suit. Logan was entirely based around it being Jackman's last time. As for me bringing up artificial boosts....when you ask a Mathematician "What's 2 + 2?" the answer will always be 4. |
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Nov 17, 2017 13:32:45 GMT
Superman IV wasn't marketed and promoted and based around it being his last time in the Super-Suit. Logan was entirely based around it being Jackman's last time. As for me bringing up artificial boosts....when you ask a Mathematician "What's 2 + 2?" the answer will always be 4. That's because it's factual. Your "artificial boosts" are something you just made up to make excuses for movies that are considered superior. Like claiming Batman Begins saw an uptick of votes after The Dark Knight came out even though actual proof shows that not to be in the slightest bit true. Then of course you had no answer for that at all when it was pointed out. |
|
chasallnut
Sophomore
@chasallnut
Posts: 506
Likes: 158
|
Post by chasallnut on Nov 17, 2017 13:36:17 GMT
It's funny that when those type of figures are used against your opinions, for example BB, TDK and TDKR against the Cap films that showed that the Batman films had much better scores, suddenly those stats don't count. You really don't see the difference.
Those scores were close and reasonable arguments can me made, and also I don't deny that TDK series is fucking great and I have no problem with somebody calling it better. But a case can be made that cap is.
Here it's not even close.
See the difference yet?
Incidentally what has the MCU and DCEU comparative scores have to do with it? My post originally stated that I thought 2/3rds of the MCU films were poor in response to you stating that they were ALL good. I beg to differ. And incidentally I do see the difference, you are disingenuous. |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Nov 17, 2017 13:37:03 GMT
You really don't see the difference.
Those scores were close and reasonable arguments can me made, and also I don't deny that TDK series is fucking great and I have no problem with somebody calling it better. But a case can be made that cap is.
Here it's not even close.
See the difference yet?
Incidentally what has the MCU and DCEU comparative scores have to do with it? My post originally stated that I thought 2/3rds of the MCU films were poor in response to you stating that they were ALL good. I beg to differ. And incidentally I do see the difference, you are disingenuous. they are
All fresh :-) and I love em
|
|
chasallnut
Sophomore
@chasallnut
Posts: 506
Likes: 158
|
Post by chasallnut on Nov 17, 2017 13:37:59 GMT
So now you know?? When are you going to invent the cure for cancer? Seriously though, Superman IV: The Quest for Peace. yeah that did so well in Reeve's swansong. You are talking utter tosh. Superman IV wasn't marketed and promoted and based around it being his last time in the Super-Suit. Logan was entirely based around it being Jackman's last time. As for me bringing up artificial boosts....when you ask a Mathematician "What's 2 + 2?" the answer will always be 4. Thanks again for proving you have no idea what the definition of fact and truth are. Your mathematical equation and answer is a fact. Your childish conspiracy theory is spurious supposition. |
|
