Do You Think BP With All White Cast Would Be Up For Awards Contention ?

no

and in away that is fine, the problem is these mcu fans don't even want to admit it.
as said, I will support BP for awards as long as MCU fans showed they supported WW for awards too.

No it wouldn't.
I also believe that:
Logan wouldn't have gotten any awards if it wasn't Hugh Jackman's last time as Wolverine.

Heath Ledger wouldn't have if he didn't die.

Wonder Woman wouldn't have been considered for any major award if it wasn't the first Blockbuster Directed by a female with the largest budget for female director about a long time feminist icon.

It's not just superhero movies. I don't think John Wayne deserved Best Actor Nomination/Win for True Grit. The Honorary Oscar wasn't seen as prestigious and the Special Achievement Award wasn't created until 2 years after True Grit. The Academy wanted to Honor John Wayne for his contribution to film, even if he wasn't a great actor (he was more of a specialist he could play 1 type really well but that's about it) so they gave him the Best Actor Oscar in 1970.

Major awards are, mores the pity, not about the best of the year. (Or it wouldn't have taken until 2007 for Martin Scorsese to get Best Director Oscar as just one more example) It's more about politics, campaigns, tapping into the zeitgeist, emotions, and business.

The awards mean absolutely nothing and have for a long time. I would say it stopped being about the best when the first campaigns started in the late 70's but it goes back further than that. Before campaigns Hollywood was so close knit they didn't need campaigns. The awards are nothing more than a popularity circle jerk of a group of people in one type of business.

I like to keep track of stuff like ratings, critics, awards, box office because I'm a numbers guy. It's like baseball statistics for me. None of it determines if a movie is Good or Bad. That can only be determined by the consumer of the art. Individual Opinion, yours specifically, is the only thing that matters on determining that.

Now is ratings, critics, awards and box office completely useless? No. They determine at the very least if the producers of the art can continue producing. This is a business so Box Office matters in that regard. Failing huge box office things like public ratings, critics, and awards can be seen as a moral victory. The makers of such art might be able to continue in the business creating with them even if they fail to make a quick profit.

Of course not. It's a good thing it's nominated for so many awards, otherwise you would've had to come up with something else to complain about.

I was just picturing
some sort of
surreal
otherworldly
blackface
satire.
There’s no other way.

Pure horseshit.
Jackman's last film has no effect and that is new and unheard off. though this will not be messy if the Oscars back then had nominated the serious grounded  comic movies at least. X1, X2, Batman Begins,  DOFP, TDKR TDK. Before logan and now BP that wants to do it by race baiting.

did Daniel  day lewis last film earn him a recognition?

is Robert Redford last film earning him an recognition?

AND THESE ARE ACTORS WHO MOVIES ARE OSCAR DARLINGS UNLIKE COMIC MOVIES THAT Jackman has been in. 

logan was down to art. the movie overshadowed even Jackman's celebrity.

As for ledger I see it as a partick stewart moment in logan, everyone wanted stewart to be nominated and he wasn't.  both deserved. 

That's your Opinion, it's not mine.

Did Daniel Day Lewis play a recurring role that help start a movement in  Cinema that has lasted 15+ years with what 8 movies?  You are telling me that if Wolverine Survived and Hugh said he had signed a contract for 3 more X-men movies then Logan would've had the same punch? You are saying Wolverine dying and Hugh Jackman hanging up his claws in a culmination of 15+ years of helping establish the Golden Age of Comicbook Movies had absolutely no effect on the people voting for the nomination? I didn't say it was the only reason for the Oscar nomination, but it was a contributing factor. With out that set of variables I don't think it would've gotten it.

The same with Heath. If Heath had survived I don't think his performance would've been as highly examined as it was. The fact that him going method and it fucking up his sleep and psyche also help push his performance into the lime light. His death can literally be traced to his drug abuse. Add to that his friends and family saying his drug abuse heightened because he couldn't sleep at night due to playing the joker. That accentuates his performance even more. The narrative is the actor literally died to make his art. 

I'm not insulting the writing or performances. I'm saying there is extenuating circumstance or context to those examples. Their are narratives that each studio pushes and what people like to hear. 

There were narratives/context/outside forces with all my examples that accentuated the art work. 

If you don't want to believe that then that's fine. 

Vassaggo be careful you’re arguing with a lawyer though and the Oscars are bound by law not to award movies he doesn’t like . Remember he knows how to lay down the law of the reality of what’s going on, Thanos-style!

I may be wrong. The narrative of the tortured artist who died for his craft helped to put a spotlight on his great performance. I do believe it was great. (I still don't think that a comic book movie has deserved a major award, Heath was the closest IMHO) I just think that narrative help frame the performance. It pushed people to vote on the nomination and for the win that wouldn't have if that narrative didn't showcase the performance.