|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on May 9, 2017 16:33:55 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on May 9, 2017 16:52:20 GMT
It looks like it was a facility run by a Scientologist rather than the church.
Imprisonment may be a part of their beliefs, but the church seems to have a bit more class than doublewides & cabins.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sulla on May 9, 2017 17:22:15 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on May 9, 2017 18:45:42 GMT
As Cinemachinery propaganda threads go, I've seen better. 4/10 |
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on May 9, 2017 19:54:25 GMT
As Cinemachinery propaganda threads go, I've seen better. 4/10  Man, everything is propaganda now! |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on May 10, 2017 6:55:37 GMT
What would you call it when you write things like this?
|
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on May 10, 2017 18:36:17 GMT
What would you call it when you write things like this? A statement of fact - he's the POTUS. Of all the odd things with which to take issue. "Propaganda!" |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on May 10, 2017 18:39:23 GMT
What would you call it when you write things like this? A statement of fact - he's the POTUS. Of all the odd things with which to take issue. "Propaganda!" You mean like millions of Americans went into poverty in "Obama's America?" Okay, laughing boy. Got it. |
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on May 10, 2017 18:55:04 GMT
A statement of fact - he's the POTUS. Of all the odd things with which to take issue. "Propaganda!" You mean like millions of Americans went into poverty in "Obama's America?" Okay, laughing boy. Got it.  Not a bad job for a guy who took the helm at the head of a market crash the likes of which we haven't seen since the 20s! Bamagination aside, Obama's term was Obama's term, just like Trump's. Why whinge about it? He's your man! |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on May 10, 2017 18:58:45 GMT
Whatever you have to tell yourself, dude. |
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on May 10, 2017 18:59:30 GMT
Cool, let me know if you come up with some sort of rebuttal!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 20:03:34 GMT
Cool, let me know if you come up with some sort of rebuttal! He has no rebuttal. Here's the part I don't understand Cine perhaps you could explain to him. Why are low income people like Erjen such veracious supporters of Trump? With his latest tax plan he essentially helicoptered large amounts of money from the government budget,money that was being spent on essential services for poorer people and air dropped it on the super rich(including himself) in the form of massive tax cuts. |
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on May 10, 2017 20:05:43 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on May 10, 2017 20:51:22 GMT
In large part due to the sources they consult on politics. What does Erjen link non-stop? Youtube conspiracy videos, not investigative reporting. They just lost a big one in Jones, but things like "Info-Wars" were highly attended by Trump's voter block.
That's not the story they're being fed. (Although I have seen some cons muttering "Hey, waitaminute" in response to Trump's claims on saving blue collar jobs versus his actions on the same.) Take a look at Breitbart: cons have been told Yates got torn apart during her testimony. Anyone who actually watched the testimony would be baffled by this.
"Low information voters". That's why. The same reason they're convinced renewable energy is a commie plot, the rejection of which just happens to benefit big oild execs who fund the story that it's a commie plot.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on May 11, 2017 8:29:43 GMT
In large part due to the sources they consult on politics. What does Erjen link non-stop? Youtube conspiracy videos, not investigative reporting. They just lost a big one in Jones, but things like "Info-Wars" were highly attended by Trump's voter block. That's not the story they're being fed. (Although I have seen some cons muttering "Hey, waitaminute" in response to Trump's claims on saving blue collar jobs versus his actions on the same.) Take a look at Breitbart: cons have been told Yates got torn apart during her testimony. Anyone who actually watched the testimony would be baffled by this. "Low information voters". That's why. The same reason they're convinced renewable energy is a commie plot, the rejection of which just happens to benefit big oild execs who fund the story that it's a commie plot. The better question is: Why are you replying to this troll's question as if what he said about me was true? I'm not a voracious supporter of Trump. I voted for him because he was the best hope to keep the "progressive" criminal out. And what does the relative term "low income" have to do with anything? Also, when did I ever say I was against renewable energy? I posted at least once about the money wasted on Obama's go-nowhere green energy scam, but I have never been against renewable energy nor did I ever think it was a commie plot. Take your time with your reply. You've got a lot of outlandish lies to make excuses for here, so there's no hurry. I'll wait. |
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on May 11, 2017 20:04:14 GMT
It's a valid question.  Please. The conservative voter block could have rallied behind any candidate in similar numbers. They chose Trump. Accountability. Even after Jones, Beck, et al give up the ghost about playing pretend to feed your youtube set, you're still regurgitating their tales. Trump won huge swaths of areas with no jobs for blue collar workers. This is not hard to figure out. Asked and answered in the same sentence. Oil companies love that you're lapping up conspiracy videos about moving to a greener infrastructure. Meanwhile Germany reached almost 80% renewable this year while our your man Trump is reducing emission standards for oil execs. Bitching about youtube conspiracies while your own fellow bends you over. You really are an incredible snapshot of his voter block. Thank goodness you allowed some time to respond to your 2:30am post. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on May 12, 2017 7:13:06 GMT
I can easily see why that would be persuasive propaganda for your target audience, but the truth is that in Obama's America trillions of dollars were poured into the search for cheap, clean, renewable energy, and it produced nothing of use, but I can't say the money was wasted on nothing. I'm sure the government bought a few thousand miles of tunnels with it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2017 11:52:54 GMT
And then you wonder why people think of you as a perfect representative of a Trump voter. The idea that "trillions of dollars were poured into the search for cheap, clean, renewable energy, and it produced nothing of use" is an utter lie. You believe it because those who make their money from oil have told you that it is true. You think you're the one in the know, but the reality is that you've been offered propaganda and you've swallowed it whole. No more, no less. |
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on May 12, 2017 15:59:00 GMT
This is what happens when you get your info from Youtube. Interestingly, almost all of the "he did nothing!" blog claims originated from one source: The Heritage Foundation. Who funds the heritage foundation? Oh! The Koch brothers! Now why on earth would Big Oil want us to think that? But the Agua Caliente Solar Power Project (as well as the next four largest solar fields in existence) owe their existence to that initiative. And that's just the tip of the melting iceberg. Warning! No videos ahead: www.scientificamerican.com/article/obama-has-done-more-for-clean-energy-than-you-think/ |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on May 12, 2017 17:27:28 GMT
This is what happens when you get your info from Youtube. Interestingly, almost all of the "he did nothing!" blog claims originated from one source: The Heritage Foundation. Who funds the heritage foundation? Oh! The Koch brothers! Now why on earth would Big Oil want us to think that? But the Agua Caliente Solar Power Project (as well as the next four largest solar fields in existence) owe their existence to that initiative. And that's just the tip of the melting iceberg. Warning! No videos ahead: www.scientificamerican.com/article/obama-has-done-more-for-clean-energy-than-you-think/Scientific American, laughing boy? The one that claims axial wobble is caused by melting polar ice from "global warming?" Surely you jest. |
|
