|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jan 21, 2021 1:16:12 GMT
Uh no, I presented an actual argument, you presented a petty insult. Notice how you didn't address anything else I've said. There is nothing to address, apart from what I already cited. What do you want to hear, that your pride is your undoing as well? "There is nothing to address, apart from what I already cited." Ok so your gonna do the SciFive route of petty insults and not addressing what I actually said. Evasion noted.
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Jan 21, 2021 1:16:59 GMT
Well don’t cut her out of The Phantom, then the movie wouldn’t make a lick of sense. I liked her a lot in that, she and Billy Zane had good chemistry. Her on-screen beauty was upstaged by Catherine Zeta-Jones though.
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Jan 21, 2021 1:22:19 GMT
Here I'll translate: "I'm a washed up has been and I'm just peddling this nonsense as a way to gain some modicum of relevance." Now with that aside, I don't think Trump get removed form the film (otherwise you could make the argument to get rid of countless reprehsible people in films). Besides it's not up to her to remove herself from Hughes films (the rights belong to the studio), it's just useless right wing virtue signaling. She was joking though, and apparently a lot of people took it seriously. Nick Searcy's response was quite funny, he requested he be edited out of The Shape of Water and others but not out of the one he appeared in with Christina Aguilera - because according to him, he was the real steaming beauty of the picture. But you're right, Trump likely won't be edited out of Home Alone 2 in the long haul, or any others for that matter. If they do though, it would be quite silly, especially in the event if its The Little Rascals where he cameod as the father of the villain Waldo.
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Jan 21, 2021 1:23:17 GMT
She wasn't missed from the Buffy franchise, I'm sure she won't be missed from these movies. Huh, last I checked there are fans of her portrayal as Buffy almost as equally as Geller's...
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Jan 21, 2021 1:24:24 GMT
Between her and all the other celebrities fighting with her on Twitter - please listen when I say that I don’t fucking care. Don’t change movies because you’re offended by someone in it. Grow up and move on. I wish you were President instead of Biden. A message like that would make me a supporter for life, sir.
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Jan 21, 2021 1:26:30 GMT
Censorship of any kind should not be tolerated in a “free” society. It’s a dangerous small step they are potentially taking if this Trump removal for HA2 is acted upon. If the studios that own these movies decide to do that (they won't), then that's their right. Legally perhaps, but wrong on other levels, censoring the past in whatever capacity doesn't always work out very well.
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jan 21, 2021 1:59:00 GMT
"There is nothing to address, apart from what I already cited." Ok so your gonna do the SciFive route of petty insults and not addressing what I actually said. Evasion noted. What? Did you actually think you said something. "You are making far too much judgement on her due to your skewered bias" My "skewered bias"? You're the one that uses "woke" in pretty much every post you make. Besides everyone has a "bias", so this is a non argument. "what you are saying is similar to what Swanson is saying regardless." How so? Are you gonna ctaully address the counterarguments I made or just keep pivoting and ma "She has just used her film appearances as an example to point out the absurdity of it." She she used a riddiculous non threat (taking her self out movies even though she has no actual authority to do so) and I pointed out why it won't happen (it's up to the studio, not her) to score "woke points" with right wing idiots, so yeah "useless right wing virtue signaling" is rather accurate. Are you gonna ctaully address the counterarguments I made or just keep pivoting?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2021 2:03:12 GMT
She wasn't missed from the Buffy franchise, I'm sure she won't be missed from these movies. Huh, last I checked there are fans of her portrayal as Buffy almost as equally as Geller's... Where'd you check, the Swanson family Christmas party?
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jan 21, 2021 2:20:31 GMT
"You are making far too much judgement on her due to your skewered bias" My "skewered bias"? You're the one that uses "woke" in pretty much every post you make. Besides everyone has a "bias", so this is a non argument. "what you are saying is similar to what Swanson is saying regardless." How so? Are you gonna ctaully address the counterarguments I made or just keep pivoting and ma "She has just used her film appearances as an example to point out the absurdity of it." She she used a riddiculous non threat (taking her self out movies even though she has no actual authority to do so) and I pointed out why it won't happen (it's up to the studio, not her) to score "woke points" with right wing idiots, so yeah "useless right wing virtue signaling" is rather accurate. Are you gonna ctaully address the counterarguments I made or just keep pivoting? You haven't made any, you can't even quote properly. Perhaps it is your devise, but that doesn't change the fact that you are just pivoting around your own sense of ridiculousness that you fail to recognize. Give me something useful to work with, otherwise go bury your head in the sand further. "You haven't made any, you can't even quote properly." Petty ad homs don't count as an argument. You're still not addressing anything I've actaully said. "Perhaps it is your devise, but that doesn't change the fact that you are just pivoting around your own sense of ridiculousness that you fail to recognize." I find it hilarious you're accusing me of "pivoting". Do you even know what that means? "Give me something useful to work with" I'm gonna ask you again, how is what I said "the same thing" as what Kristen Swanson said? Try to actually answer without evading and throwing petty insults.
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Jan 21, 2021 2:21:09 GMT
Huh, last I checked there are fans of her portrayal as Buffy almost as equally as Geller's... Where'd you check, the Swanson family Christmas party? I have to admit that made me laugh XD But yeah, there are fans of her Buffy.
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Jan 21, 2021 2:42:29 GMT
Between her and all the other celebrities fighting with her on Twitter - please listen when I say that I don’t fucking care. Don’t change movies because you’re offended by someone in it. Grow up and move on. I wish you were President instead of Biden. A message like that would make me a supporter for life, sir. Can’t tell if you’re serious or not, but I can string a full sentence together so I’ve got the leg up on him at the moment.
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Jan 21, 2021 3:17:33 GMT
Censorship of any kind should not be tolerated in a “free” society. It’s a dangerous small step they are potentially taking if this Trump removal for HA2 is acted upon. It's not dangerous at all. That said, people are taking both stories too seriously.
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jan 21, 2021 3:21:54 GMT
"You haven't made any, you can't even quote properly." Petty ad homs don't count as an argument. You're still not addressing anything I've actaully said. "Perhaps it is your devise, but that doesn't change the fact that you are just pivoting around your own sense of ridiculousness that you fail to recognize." I find it hilarious you're accusing me of "pivoting". Do you even know what that means? "Give me something useful to work with" I'm gonna ask you again, how is what I said "the same thing" as what Kristen Swanson said? Try to actually answer without evading and throwing petty insults. Interesting how you started out with an ad-hom and insults regarding Swanson, yet you give yourself a free-pass for your own.
What you mean and what you ask, is not worth considering or worth a pinch of salt.
"Interesting how you started out with an ad-hom and insults regarding Swanson, yet you give yourself a free-pass for your own." I don't think you know what "ad hom" actually means. "What you mean and what you ask, is not worth considering or worth a pinch of salt." Evasion noted. You might actually be worse than SciFive, at least she actaully tried to make an occasional argument
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jan 21, 2021 3:22:28 GMT
Interesting how you started out with an ad-hom and insults regarding Swanson, yet you give yourself a free-pass for your own.
What you mean and what you ask, is not worth considering or worth a pinch of salt.
"Interesting how you started out with an ad-hom and insults regarding Swanson, yet you give yourself a free-pass for your own." I don't think you know what "ad hom" actually means. I addressed her dumb position. Calling her a "has been" was to add to my point (if she was actaully relevant, so you think she would have been as incline to hold the same position?) "What you mean and what you ask, is not worth considering or worth a pinch of salt." Evasion noted. You might actually be worse than SciFive, at least she actually tried to make an occasional argument
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jan 21, 2021 3:25:55 GMT
"Interesting how you started out with an ad-hom and insults regarding Swanson, yet you give yourself a free-pass for your own." I don't think you know what "ad hom" actually means. "What you mean and what you ask, is not worth considering or worth a pinch of salt." Evasion noted. You might actually be worse than SciFive, at least she actaully tried to make an occasional argument Well, when you make one that is worth hearing, I will be all ears. As it stands, yours is barely holding up on crutches. Evasion still noted. If my argument is so bad, you should have no problem refuting it. Your realize how bad this makes you look, right?
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jan 21, 2021 3:50:47 GMT
Evasion still noted. If my argument is so bad, you should have no problem refuting it. Your realize how bad this makes you look, right? How bad does your opinion make you look? This isn't an argument. Evasion still noted.
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jan 21, 2021 4:16:43 GMT
This isn't an argument. Evasion still noted. How bad does my opinion make me look that I made to you? Do you really think anyone cares about how important you think you feel? Evasion still noted. Still waiting for you to make an actual argument.
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Jan 21, 2021 4:41:18 GMT
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jan 21, 2021 4:44:19 GMT
Evasion still noted. Still waiting for you to make an actual argument. What is it you would you like me to argue for, your own conceit and hypocrisy? You have done enough of a good job with this as it stands. You are making a poor argument to have your own sense of self-importance be validated. Isn't this what you are accusing Swanson of?
Swanson knows the context of what she claimed, and what is or isn't possible. She's not an idiot. Twitter also has a limit to how much can be stated, so she made her point within those restraints. You just saw an opening to act like she doesn't know what she is talking about due to her political leanings which don't side with your own. You made your own disparaging take on what she said with a direct insult to her.
"What is it you would you like me to argue for, your own conceit and hypocrisy?" What conceit or hypocricy have I actually done? Cite the actual quote so I know you're not Strawmanning what I actually said. "Swanson knows the context of what she claimed, and what is or isn't possible. She's not an idiot." Then why did she make that idiotic Tweet about removing her apperearances despite having no actual ability to do so? Either she's an idiot or she was just making a baseless threat to appeal to right wing idiots (virtue signaling) and gain some relevance in the media. Which is it? "Twitter also has a limit to how much can be stated, so she made her point within those restraints." So you think making a longer Tweet would have made it less dumb? How so? Is there a certain "context" I'm missing? "You just saw an opening to act like she doesn't know what she is talking about " She is either very stupid or making useless virtue signaling . Which is it? "due to her political leanings which don't side with your own." Uh, you're the one that keeps using "woke" in all your posts every time some Hollywood type says something you don't like. Everyone that isn't completely apolitical is gonna have some political leanings (including yourself). This is a nonargument.
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jan 21, 2021 5:25:30 GMT
"What is it you would you like me to argue for, your own conceit and hypocrisy?" What conceit or hypocricy have I actually done? Cite the actual quote so I know you're not Strawmanning what I actually said. "Swanson knows the context of what she claimed, and what is or isn't possible. She's not an idiot." Then why did she make that idiotic Tweet about removing her apperearances despite having no actual ability to do so? Either she's an idiot or she was just making a baseless threat to appeal to right wing idiots (virtue signaling) and gain some relevance in the media. Which is it? "Twitter also has a limit to how much can be stated, so she made her point within those restraints." So you think making a longer Tweet would have made it less dumb? How so? Is there a certain "context" I'm missing? "You just saw an opening to act like she doesn't know what she is talking about " She is either very stupid or making useless virtue signaling . Which is it? "due to her political leanings which don't side with your own." Uh, you're the one that keeps using "woke" in all your posts every time some Hollywood type says something you don't like. Everyone that isn't completely apolitical is gonna have some political leanings (including yourself). This is a nonargument. Yes, I know you've made a non-argument and if you can't see your own contradiction by hating on Swanson, then there is no hope for you son. Once again, you're not addressing anything I've said. Evasion still noted.
|
|