|
Post by miike80 on May 31, 2017 10:24:40 GMT
Seems legit I also have a friend who has a friend that works for a company. Long story short he saw Justice League and it's a masterpiece, better than Godfather. what, no credibility?
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on May 31, 2017 12:39:03 GMT
I wish I could see the egg on his face.
|
|
northernlad
Sophomore
@northernlad
Posts: 898
Likes: 620
|
Post by northernlad on May 31, 2017 13:39:06 GMT
Wow...was he full of <bleep> or what?
|
|
|
Post by primeone on May 31, 2017 14:09:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Jun 1, 2017 0:12:07 GMT
That's what was said of an earlier cut of the movie, which was echoed here and there by others who had seen it. Midnight's Edge did a report about it months ago and their inside source said at the time that the working cut was something of a mess but a fixable one nonetheless. Given the response the film is getting it seems the studio took notice and created a much better version.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Jun 1, 2017 1:36:26 GMT
That's what was said of an earlier cut of the movie, which was echoed here and there by others who had seen it. Midnight's Edge did a report about it months ago and their inside source said at the time that the working cut was something of a mess but a fixable one nonetheless. Given the response the film is getting it seems the studio took notice and created a much better version. That does t really make sense. How does one determine whether or not a film is a mess by an unfinished cut? Furthermore, if the film really was bad enough to be deemed a "mess", how exactly would the studio have been able to fix that, without undergoing some massive reshoots?
|
|
nemesis617
Sophomore
@nemesis617
Posts: 167
Likes: 84
|
Post by nemesis617 on Jun 1, 2017 1:58:49 GMT
I agree. I remember thinking back to that post when the RT score came out. This is why I never take those I guess you could say "rumors" so seriously. I just sit back and wait until the actual reviews come out and go from there.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 1, 2017 2:39:18 GMT
That's what was said of an earlier cut of the movie, which was echoed here and there by others who had seen it. Midnight's Edge did a report about it months ago and their inside source said at the time that the working cut was something of a mess but a fixable one nonetheless. Given the response the film is getting it seems the studio took notice and created a much better version. That does t really make sense. How does one determine whether or not a film is a mess by an unfinished cut? Furthermore, if the film really was bad enough to be deemed a "mess", how exactly would the studio have been able to fix that, without undergoing some massive reshoots? I remember when that story came out, it said an anonymous former employee at WB. So probably just some bullshit rumor started by a disgruntled former employee.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 1, 2017 2:39:42 GMT
I agree. I remember thinking back to that post when the RT score came out. This is why I never take those I guess you could say "rumors" so seriously. I just sit back and wait until the actual reviews come out and go from there. I remember when that story came out, it said an anonymous former employee at WB. So probably just some bullshit rumor started by a disgruntled former employee.
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Jun 1, 2017 4:52:49 GMT
Simple - Test audiences see an early cut and execs use what was clicking right or not with them to help improve their product before theatrical release. Happens all the time, no matter how huge or small the change is( However, if the screening is too late in the game not much can be done, earlier however...)
Some people said an early cut of Wonder Woman was a mess, but not a disaster. Midnight's Edge's insider said the cut seen was a mess but emphasized that it was a fixable one, and easier to spruce up in post than Suicide Squad for example. So they spruced it up more and it's a success. Simple as that.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Jun 1, 2017 5:04:49 GMT
Simple - Test audiences see an early cut and execs use what was clicking right or not with them to help improve their product before theatrical release. Happens all the time, no matter how huge or small the change is( However, if the screening is too late in the game not much can be done, earlier however...) Some people said an early cut of Wonder Woman was a mess, but not a disaster. Midnight's Edge's insider said the cut seen was a mess but emphasized that it was a fixable one, and easier to spruce up in post than Suicide Squad for example. So they spruced it up more and it's a success. Simple as that. Except from what I've heard, the movie reportedly didn't begin test screenings until February, and DesiredFX's post was from December or January as I recall. I just don't buy it. Besides, as I said earlier, every movie is a "mess" while it's still being edited. If the movie was really so bad that some guy overseeing the test screenings thinks that it's going to be a failure, I don't see how anything short of massive reshoots could've saved it.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 1, 2017 7:11:47 GMT
Simple - Test audiences see an early cut and execs use what was clicking right or not with them to help improve their product before theatrical release. Happens all the time, no matter how huge or small the change is( However, if the screening is too late in the game not much can be done, earlier however...) Some people said an early cut of Wonder Woman was a mess, but not a disaster. Midnight's Edge's insider said the cut seen was a mess but emphasized that it was a fixable one, and easier to spruce up in post than Suicide Squad for example. So they spruced it up more and it's a success. Simple as that. Except from what I've heard, the movie reportedly didn't begin test screenings until February, and DesiredFX's post was from December or January as I recall. Looks like judgejosephdredd is trying to cling to a false rumor. Typical of MCU fans to spread false rumors to try to derail the DCEU. But they've failed big-time as Wonder Woman has gotten overwhelmingly positive reviews.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jun 1, 2017 12:31:28 GMT
Except from what I've heard, the movie reportedly didn't begin test screenings until February, and DesiredFX's post was from December or January as I recall. Looks like judgejosephdredd is trying to cling to a false rumor. Typical of MCU fans to spread false rumors to try to derail the DCEU. But they've failed big-time as Wonder Woman has gotten overwhelmingly positive reviews. It's not out of the realm of possibility that the early cuts weren't as good as the final product. It happens. Only this time, if it's the case, WB learned from it.
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Jun 1, 2017 12:42:22 GMT
Looks like judgejosephdredd is trying to cling to a false rumor. Typical of MCU fans to spread false rumors to try to derail the DCEU. But they've failed big-time as Wonder Woman has gotten overwhelmingly positive reviews. It's not out of the realm of possibility that the early cuts weren't as good as the final product. It happens. Only this time, if it's the case, WB learned from it. it's a fake news troll, and biased idiots believe the trolling. Troll just posten the same nonsense again on TMDB today.
www.themoviedb.org/movie/297762-wonder-woman/discuss/593000b6c3a3684779008f6a
|
|
chatterer
Sophomore
@chatterer
Posts: 272
Likes: 112
|
Post by chatterer on Jun 1, 2017 14:24:41 GMT
Simple - Test audiences see an early cut and execs use what was clicking right or not with them to help improve their product before theatrical release. Happens all the time, no matter how huge or small the change is( However, if the screening is too late in the game not much can be done, earlier however...) Some people said an early cut of Wonder Woman was a mess, but not a disaster. Midnight's Edge's insider said the cut seen was a mess but emphasized that it was a fixable one, and easier to spruce up in post than Suicide Squad for example. So they spruced it up more and it's a success. Simple as that. Except from what I've heard, the movie reportedly didn't begin test screenings until February, and DesiredFX's post was from December or January as I recall. I just don't buy it. Besides, as I said earlier, every movie is a "mess" while it's still being edited. If the movie was really so bad that some guy overseeing the test screenings thinks that it's going to be a failure, I don't see how anything short of massive reshoots could've saved it. Having watched the movie today. I find it very unlikely WW was a mess. I think it was just a rumour. It has to be the most balanced fun, hopeful and sad movie from the DCEU to date.
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Jun 1, 2017 14:27:29 GMT
So where exactly does he tell why it's a mess?
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 1, 2017 14:49:32 GMT
Looks like judgejosephdredd is trying to cling to a false rumor. Typical of MCU fans to spread false rumors to try to derail the DCEU. But they've failed big-time as Wonder Woman has gotten overwhelmingly positive reviews. It's not out of the realm of possibility that the early cuts weren't as good as the final product. It happens. Only this time, if it's the case, WB learned from it. thisguy4000 wrote:
"the movie reportedly didn't begin test screenings until February, and DesiredFX's post was from December or January"
So unless the guy from judgejosephdredd's false rumor who claimed that the early screenings were a mess is psychic, it's just a bullshit rumor that MCU fans spread and cling to try to derail the DCEU.
Just look at what the bullshit rumor says: "I don't enjoy spending upwards of $10 on a movie I end up disliking." It's basically telling people not to spend money to watch Wonder Woman 6 months before the movie is released and before any test screenings had occurred. Clearly that's just an attempt by an MCU fan to try to derail the DCEU. But they've failed big-time because Wonder Woman continues to get overwhelmingly positive reviews.
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Jun 1, 2017 15:05:49 GMT
It's not out of the realm of possibility that the early cuts weren't as good as the final product. It happens. Only this time, if it's the case, WB learned from it. Clearly that's just an attempt by an MCU fan to try to derail the DCEU. But they've failed big-time because Wonder Woman continues to get overwhelmingly positive reviews.
it will not influence the critics, but it's an attempt to spread false word-of-mouth to create a negative mood, and to ultimately affect the commercial success; it's an old ploy. This guy is still pulling the same routine to this day, others are doing it too.
If the Russians do it to influence elections, why not some desperate fanboys to influence and poison box office success for their team.
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Jun 1, 2017 15:56:02 GMT
Some films do have earlier test screenings which are not made public till later on, and DesiredFX was not known to be a troll or a liar so I don't think he'd pull something out of his rear end just to create anxiety for DC fanatics. And yes, every movie is a "mess" while its still being edited, but if its screened to a group of people then the bulk of it must be deemed good enough to show a version that can function as the theatrical cut largely. Midnight's Edge's inside source from 4Chan, totally unrelated to DesiredFX mind you, emphasized that the movie was very fixable - No need for extensive reshoots or whatever just edit more in post to improve pace, tone shift, etc.
How do you know that's the real DesiredFX? Could be a troll using the same username to mess with people.
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Jun 1, 2017 15:59:26 GMT
The thing is DC-Fan a few people, not just DesiredFX's associates, did reportedly see an earlier cut and said it was somewhat of a mess, it has nothing to do with Marvel fans trying to ruin a film for another fan base, it has to do with how a product improved over time given then and now with its critical success. And for the record I am as much a fan of DC as I am of Marvel and I cannot wait to see WW tomorrow.
|
|