|
Post by scienceisgod on Jul 20, 2017 21:50:43 GMT
According to Justice Department stats, about half of all child sex abuse convictions are homosexual. Homosexuals are not anywhere near half the population. Even if we use the admitted propaganda statistic of 10%, that's 5 times overrepresentation. It's overwhelming. Psychiatrists even came up with the designation "men who have sex with men" to try and protect their image. We should also suspect that homosexual molestation is less likely to be reported than heterosexual molestation for the same reason many homosexuals stay closeted. The big scandals, like in the Priesthood, Boy Scouts, wrestling teams, etc... invariably homosexual, tend to be exposed by outsiders.
Discuss:
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jul 20, 2017 22:19:31 GMT
Didn't you know all homosexuals are really pedophiles deep down?
|
|
|
Post by clusium on Jul 20, 2017 23:38:24 GMT
According to Justice Department stats, about half of all child sex abuse convictions are homosexual. Homosexuals are not anywhere near half the population. Even if we use the admitted propaganda statistic of 10%, that's 5 times overrepresentation. It's overwhelming. Psychiatrists even came up with the designation "men who have sex with men" to try and protect their image. We should also suspect that homosexual molestation is less likely to be reported than heterosexual molestation for the same reason many homosexuals stay closeted. The big scandals, like in the Priesthood, Boy Scouts, wrestling teams, etc... invariably homosexual, tend to be exposed by outsiders. Discuss: When it comes to the sex slayings of children, I find that in the majority of the cases, the victims were little girls (at least here in Ontario, anyway). I only know of 2 cases where the victims were boys: 1)Emanuel Jacques, who was abducted, gang-raped, & murdered, back in 1977, & 2)Christopher Stephenson, who was abducted, raped, & murdered back in 1988. All the other cases, that I know of, involved little girls (belonging to the same gender of the majority of the victims of sex-slayings).
|
|
fritzelly
Sophomore
@fritzelly
Posts: 296
Likes: 82
|
Post by fritzelly on Jul 20, 2017 23:52:05 GMT
Link to the actual stats or just some made up fantasy?
Most child molestation is done by the family - whether it be boys or girls and homosexuality has nothing to do with it just purely depravity
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2017 1:27:37 GMT
According to Justice Department stats, about half of all child sex abuse convictions are homosexual. First off, what makes you think the conviction rate is in any way representative of the two populations of pedophiles?
|
|
|
Post by captainbryce on Jul 21, 2017 1:37:05 GMT
According to Justice Department stats, about half of all child sex abuse convictions are homosexual. There is no evidence that this claim is true. And the fact that you failed to provide a link validating your claim should be taken as acknowledgement that you already know this is a lie. Homosexuals are not anywhere near half the population. Even if we use the admitted propaganda statistic of 10%, that's 5 times overrepresentation. It's overwhelming. You don't know what percentage of the population is homosexual OR pedophiles. Any numbers provided by you are no doubt made up, and therefore cannot be taken seriously. Psychiatrists even came up with the designation "men who have sex with men" to try and protect their image. There is no evidence to validate this absurd theory, and therefore once again no reason to take it seriously. We should also suspect that homosexual molestation is less likely to be reported than heterosexual molestation for the same reason many homosexuals stay closeted. That is a non-sequitur (it does not follow). The big scandals, like in the Priesthood, Boy Scouts, wrestling teams, etc... invariably homosexual, tend to be exposed by outsiders. The Priesthood is easily explained by the fact that the Catholic Church forbids priests to marry, and alter girls are not a thing. So what options do they have but to sexually assault the most convenient targets -- altar boys! What boy scout and wrestling team "big scandals" are you talking about exactly? Validate your claims:
|
|
|
Post by clusium on Jul 21, 2017 2:43:26 GMT
According to Justice Department stats, about half of all child sex abuse convictions are homosexual. There is no evidence that this claim is true. And the fact that you failed to provide a link validating your claim should be taken as acknowledgement that you already know this is a lie. Homosexuals are not anywhere near half the population. Even if we use the admitted propaganda statistic of 10%, that's 5 times overrepresentation. It's overwhelming. You don't know what percentage of the population is homosexual OR pedophiles. Any numbers provided by you are no doubt made up, and therefore cannot be taken seriously. Psychiatrists even came up with the designation "men who have sex with men" to try and protect their image. There is no evidence to validate this absurd theory, and therefore once again no reason to take it seriously. We should also suspect that homosexual molestation is less likely to be reported than heterosexual molestation for the same reason many homosexuals stay closeted. That is a non-sequitur (it does not follow). The big scandals, like in the Priesthood, Boy Scouts, wrestling teams, etc... invariably homosexual, tend to be exposed by outsiders. The Priesthood is easily explained by the fact that the Catholic Church forbids priests to marry, and alter girls are not a thing. So what options do they have but to sexually assault the most convenient targets -- altar boys! What boy scout and wrestling team "big scandals" are you talking about exactly? Validate your claims: No, priestly celibacy does not cause men to become sex offenders!!! Otherwise, you would never hear of married men committing sex crimes. Actually, I think that line of thinking is insulting to men. Not just priests; not just Catholic men, but, ALL MEN!! It is saying men cannot control their sexual impulses. But, you are right about the fact that there are very few girls who serve on the altar or sing in the choir, as to why there are more male victims than female victims of sexually deviant priests.
|
|
|
Post by Karl Aksel on Jul 21, 2017 7:14:15 GMT
Are half of convicted pedophiles homosexual? Or were half the victims simply boys (and victims of men)? Because the two are not necessarily the same. It is fully possible for pedophiles to be into prepubescent boys - but not adult men. And then there is also the question of availability: Many of these cases deal with men who are in some sort of authority position over boys - but not girls. Girls of the same age tend to have female authority figures, so no wonder the statistics are skewed.
|
|
|
Post by kls on Jul 21, 2017 7:23:56 GMT
The big scandals, like in the Priesthood, Boy Scouts, wrestling teams, etc... invariably homosexual, tend to be exposed by outsiders. The Priesthood is easily explained by the fact that the Catholic Church forbids priests to marry, and alter girls are not a thing. So what options do they have but to sexually assault the most convenient targets -- altar boys! What boy scout and wrestling team "big scandals" are you talking about exactly? Validate your claims: What do you mean Altar Girls are not a thing? I was an Altar server about 40 years ago.
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jul 21, 2017 7:31:21 GMT
Are half of convicted pedophiles homosexual? Or were half the victims simply boys (and victims of men)? Because the two are not necessarily the same. It is fully possible for pedophiles to be into prepubescent boys - but not adult men. And then there is also the question of availability: Many of these cases deal with men who are in some sort of authority position over boys - but not girls. Girls of the same age tend to have female authority figures, so no wonder the statistics are skewed. The definition of homosexuality is not "sexual attraction to adults of the same sex." Even if what you say is true that does not mean that it is incorrect to say homosexuals are more likely to have sex with kids or that most pedophiles are homosexuals. Your proof for your first sentence makes no sense. How is that proof or even evidence that half of victims might not be cases of man-boy sex?
|
|
|
Post by Karl Aksel on Jul 21, 2017 8:03:37 GMT
Are half of convicted pedophiles homosexual? Or were half the victims simply boys (and victims of men)? Because the two are not necessarily the same. It is fully possible for pedophiles to be into prepubescent boys - but not adult men. And then there is also the question of availability: Many of these cases deal with men who are in some sort of authority position over boys - but not girls. Girls of the same age tend to have female authority figures, so no wonder the statistics are skewed. The definition of homosexuality is not "sexual attraction to adults of the same sex." Even if what you say is true that does not mean that it is incorrect to say homosexuals are more likely to have sex with kids or that most pedophiles are homosexuals. Your proof for your first sentence makes no sense. How is that proof or even evidence that half of victims might not be cases of man-boy sex? There is no evidence to support that homosexuals are more likely to have sex with children. Many of these offenders are married to women, women they have slept with far more often than they have slept with boys. These are grown men who are drawn to the innocence of children, and seem to prefer females among adults. Perhaps for the same reason. Oh sure, there are homosexual pedophiles as well, but I do not see any evidence that homosexuals are overrepresented. And what "proof"? I never claimed to offer any "proof". So damned straight it doesn't make any sense - none of what you said with regards to that "proof" did, because you are claiming I said something I did not remotely say.
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jul 21, 2017 8:12:46 GMT
The definition of homosexuality is not "sexual attraction to adults of the same sex." Even if what you say is true that does not mean that it is incorrect to say homosexuals are more likely to have sex with kids or that most pedophiles are homosexuals. Your proof for your first sentence makes no sense. How is that proof or even evidence that half of victims might not be cases of man-boy sex? There is no evidence to support that homosexuals are more likely to have sex with children. Many of these offenders are married to women, women they have slept with far more often than they have slept with boys. These are grown men who are drawn to the innocence of children, and seem to prefer females among adults. Perhaps for the same reason. Oh sure, there are homosexual pedophiles as well, but I do not see any evidence that homosexuals are overrepresented. And what "proof"? I never claimed to offer any "proof". So damned straight it doesn't make any sense - none of what you said with regards to that "proof" did, because you are claiming I said something I did not remotely say. Assuming what you say is true (they're married men) then that would make them Bisexual. Attracted to the innocence of children? What do you even mean by innocence? This is psuedoscientific nonsense. You said half of victims may not be boys and then talked about how boys usually have men as authority so I presumed this was your evidence for that. My mistake.
|
|
|
Post by Karl Aksel on Jul 21, 2017 8:44:05 GMT
There is no evidence to support that homosexuals are more likely to have sex with children. Many of these offenders are married to women, women they have slept with far more often than they have slept with boys. These are grown men who are drawn to the innocence of children, and seem to prefer females among adults. Perhaps for the same reason. Oh sure, there are homosexual pedophiles as well, but I do not see any evidence that homosexuals are overrepresented. And what "proof"? I never claimed to offer any "proof". So damned straight it doesn't make any sense - none of what you said with regards to that "proof" did, because you are claiming I said something I did not remotely say. Assuming what you say is true (they're married men) then that would make them Bisexual. Attracted to the innocence of children? What do you even mean by innocence? This is psuedoscientific nonsense. You said half of victims may not be boys and then talked about how boys usually have men as authority so I presumed this was your evidence for that. My mistake. There is nothing pseudoscientific about the well-established fact that children exude innocence from their appearance. I did not say they are innocent, because actual innocence is not something one can be attracted to - only perceived innocence. I did not say "half of victimes may not be boys", by the way. In fact, I said just about the opposite: I said that it may well be that half the victims are boys - and I proceded to list possible reasons for that.
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Jul 21, 2017 8:52:59 GMT
According to Justice Department stats, about half of all child sex abuse convictions are homosexual. Homosexuals are not anywhere near half the population. Even if we use the admitted propaganda statistic of 10%, that's 5 times overrepresentation. It's overwhelming. Psychiatrists even came up with the designation "men who have sex with men" to try and protect their image. We should also suspect that homosexual molestation is less likely to be reported than heterosexual molestation for the same reason many homosexuals stay closeted. The big scandals, like in the Priesthood, Boy Scouts, wrestling teams, etc... invariably homosexual, tend to be exposed by outsiders. Discuss: Discuss what? Your concocted data similar to when you claimed domestic violence among one group is extremely higher than the rest and at the same time misrepresented the data to make your case? Don't you ever get tired of this stupidity?
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jul 21, 2017 8:53:30 GMT
Assuming what you say is true (they're married men) then that would make them Bisexual. Attracted to the innocence of children? What do you even mean by innocence? This is psuedoscientific nonsense. You said half of victims may not be boys and then talked about how boys usually have men as authority so I presumed this was your evidence for that. My mistake. There is nothing pseudoscientific about the well-established fact that children exude innocence from their appearance. I did not say they are innocent, because actual innocence is not something one can be attracted to - only perceived innocence. I did not say "half of victimes may not be boys", by the way. In fact, I said just about the opposite: I said that it may well be that half the victims are boys - and I proceded to list possible reasons for that. What do you even mean by innocence? I said it's psuedoscientific to say pedophiles find a child's innocence (whatever that even means) attractive.
|
|
|
Post by Karl Aksel on Jul 21, 2017 8:58:32 GMT
There is nothing pseudoscientific about the well-established fact that children exude innocence from their appearance. I did not say they are innocent, because actual innocence is not something one can be attracted to - only perceived innocence. I did not say "half of victimes may not be boys", by the way. In fact, I said just about the opposite: I said that it may well be that half the victims are boys - and I proceded to list possible reasons for that. What do you even mean by innocence? I said it's psuedoscientific to say pedophiles find a child's innocence (whatever that even means) attractive. The way we find a baby's face innocent - without knowledge of all the evils in the world, blameless. The open trust they show towards you. What triggers our protective instincts.
|
|
|
Post by Superdude6091 on Jul 21, 2017 9:32:55 GMT
Congratulations to Eva and Rabbit.
By talking about paedophilia with Sadorah you've now encouraged Mutha to start his own pedophile thread.
Are we to have a repeat of last years multiple pedophile threads here when these sad two f@ckers deploy socks orcall for reinforcements.
Disgusting.
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jul 21, 2017 9:50:12 GMT
What do you even mean by innocence? I said it's psuedoscientific to say pedophiles find a child's innocence (whatever that even means) attractive. The way we find a baby's face innocent - without knowledge of all the evils in the world, blameless. The open trust they show towards you. What triggers our protective instincts. He vast majority of prepubescent children would not be "innocent" then. What makes you think a pedophile finds that attractive?
|
|
PanLeo
Sophomore
@saoradh
Posts: 919
Likes: 53
|
Post by PanLeo on Jul 21, 2017 9:51:56 GMT
Congratulations to Eva and Rabbit. By talking about paedophilia with Sadorah you've now encouraged Mutha to start his own pedophile thread. Are we to have a repeat of last years multiple pedophile threads here when these sad two f@ckers deploy socks orcall for reinforcements. Disgusting. That never happened. I am sorry this thread triggered you, are you going to get into a huff and delete your account again like a child?
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Jul 21, 2017 10:01:27 GMT
Assuming what you say is true (they're married men) then that would make them Bisexual. Attracted to the innocence of children? What do you even mean by innocence? This is psuedoscientific nonsense. You said half of victims may not be boys and then talked about how boys usually have men as authority so I presumed this was your evidence for that. My mistake. There is nothing pseudoscientific about the well-established fact that children exude innocence from their appearance So what would be scientific, empirical support of that?
|
|