|
Post by darkpast on Sept 2, 2017 3:53:46 GMT
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Sept 2, 2017 4:26:16 GMT
Oh I'm sure someone's gonna be impressed.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Sept 2, 2017 12:36:49 GMT
honestly I don't think anybody cares. There's way too much other good stuff out right now and Punisher and Thor are coming up. Inhumans doesn't matter at all.
|
|
chatterer
Sophomore
@chatterer
Posts: 272
Likes: 112
|
Post by chatterer on Sept 2, 2017 13:15:54 GMT
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Sept 2, 2017 14:41:06 GMT
Marvel made a tremendous mistake when they decided to go against making a movie for this but instead let the Inhumans be a plot point for Agents of Shield which was always a pretty poor show itself.
They could have had another Guardians of the Galaxy kind of success with this.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2017 14:43:28 GMT
Marvel made a tremendous mistake when they decided to go against making a movie for this but instead let the Inhumans be a plot point for Agents of Shield which was always a pretty poor show itself. They could have had another Guardians of the Galaxy kind of success with this. Oh, look, somebody's here to whine again about how everything the MCU does is stupid and wrong.
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Sept 2, 2017 16:50:28 GMT
Marvel made a tremendous mistake when they decided to go against making a movie for this but instead let the Inhumans be a plot point for Agents of Shield which was always a pretty poor show itself. They could have had another Guardians of the Galaxy kind of success with this. Inhumans have enough juicy history to build a TV series on, and with ties to Agents of SHIELD( Which I do genuinely like, just getting it out there) there's plenty of crossover potential. But I'm not sure what they were thinking with this attempt, it's definitely up there as one of the most expensive TV productions in history yet it still feels cheap looking - Attilan doesn't look like a feast for the eyes, and the color grading is extremely muted and almost nothing stands out. Inhumans was Kirby as Jack could do, and given how Thor Ragnarok looks Inhumans could've at least tried to be more Kirby-esque but its more Kirby-muted. I guess there's room for improvement though. I wish the film rights to The Fantastic Four were with Disney, because they have such rich history with The Inhumans - Crystal's been romantically linked with Johnny Storm and Ben Grimm, and both Crystal and Medusa have been FF members.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Sept 2, 2017 19:27:25 GMT
Marvel made a tremendous mistake when they decided to go against making a movie for this but instead let the Inhumans be a plot point for Agents of Shield which was always a pretty poor show itself. They could have had another Guardians of the Galaxy kind of success with this. Oh, look, somebody's here to whine again about how everything the MCU does is stupid and wrong. Christ, stop whining, you're like a sensitive girl. It's fine to be a fan of the MCU, I'm a big fan myself but you haven't constantly lick it's ballsack.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Sept 2, 2017 19:31:13 GMT
Marvel made a tremendous mistake when they decided to go against making a movie for this but instead let the Inhumans be a plot point for Agents of Shield which was always a pretty poor show itself. They could have had another Guardians of the Galaxy kind of success with this. Inhumans have enough juicy history to build a TV series on, and with ties to Agents of SHIELD( Which I do genuinely like, just getting it out there) there's plenty of crossover potential. But I'm not sure what they were thinking with this attempt, it's definitely up there as one of the most expensive TV productions in history yet it still feels cheap looking - Attilan doesn't look like a feast for the eyes, and the color grading is extremely muted and almost nothing stands out. Inhumans was Kirby as Jack could do, and given how Thor Ragnarok looks Inhumans could've at least tried to be more Kirby-esque but its more Kirby-muted. I guess there's room for improvement though. I wish the film rights to The Fantastic Four were with Disney, because they have such rich history with The Inhumans - Crystal's been romantically linked with Johnny Storm and Ben Grimm, and both Crystal and Medusa have been FF members. It does look cheap looking. I'm not sure why but a lot of these superhero TV shows seem that way except for the Netflix ones. I'm not impressed at all with how Blackbolt looks or the others. The CGI on Lockjaw is pretty shabby as well. A series for Daredevil kinds works because it's mostly just a guy in a simple ninja/armoured suit with no expensive looking superpowers but that's not the case here. They could have made a couple big movies out of this but instead we have a series that probably won't last too long.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2017 19:34:53 GMT
Oh, look, somebody's here to whine again about how everything the MCU does is stupid and wrong. Christ, stop whining, you're like a sensitive girl. It's fine to be a fan of the MCU, I'm a big fan myself but you haven't constantly lick it's ballsack. I can say the same about you and DC movies.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Sept 2, 2017 19:41:39 GMT
Christ, stop whining, you're like a sensitive girl. It's fine to be a fan of the MCU, I'm a big fan myself but you haven't constantly lick it's ballsack. I can say the same about you and DC movies. No you couldn't. I generally much prefer Marvel's movies to DC's, most people do these days. That doesn't stop The Dark Knight series from being the best out the lot though. As good as these Marvel movies are and they have all been good there's a reason why The Dark Knight is #4 on IMDB out the many thousands upon thousands of movies that been made. It is in a league of its own. Whether you agree or not, it is the highest rated superhero movie ever, by audiences and critics. It's also an Oscar winner.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2017 19:43:55 GMT
The Dark Knight isn't the best of the whole lot. Not by a long shot. It just has the last performance of a beloved actor. That's it. The IMDb Top 250 is a fucking useless poll.
The Oscars are worthless, too. I don't have to accept anything, because there are a lot of stupid people out there. Their opinions mean nothing.
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Sept 2, 2017 19:54:30 GMT
The Dark Knight isn't the best of the whole lot. Not by a long shot. It just has the last performance of a beloved actor. That's it. The IMDb Top 250 is a fucking useless poll. The Oscars are worthless, too. I don't have to accept anything, because there are a lot of stupid people out there. Their opinions mean nothing. Especially since a lot of shit-for-brain Nolanites will rate anything Nolan 10/10. He could film a piece of shit for 3 hours, and those morons would call it the best thing ever.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Sept 2, 2017 19:54:36 GMT
The Dark Knight isn't the best of the whole lot. Not by a long shot. It just has the last performance of a beloved actor. That's it. The IMDb Top 250 is a fucking useless poll. The Oscars are worthless, too. I don't have to accept anything, because there are a lot of stupid people out there. Their opinions mean nothing. Nah sorry your lone opinion doesn't mean anything against any of this. A total of 1.83 million users have The Dark Knight an average of 9.0 which is just staggering. The same user base has rated the Marvel movies pretty highly as well actually but not well enough to be in the Top 250. Hundreds of professional critics rate The Dark Knight higher than any superhero movie that's been made. The movie won two Oscars and got 8 nominations. All the MCU movies out together only have 4 nominations between them. There's no comparison to be made.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2017 19:56:38 GMT
The Dark Knight isn't the best of the whole lot. Not by a long shot. It just has the last performance of a beloved actor. That's it. The IMDb Top 250 is a fucking useless poll. The Oscars are worthless, too. I don't have to accept anything, because there are a lot of stupid people out there. Their opinions mean nothing. Nah sorry your lone opinion doesn't mean anything against any of this. A total of 1.83 million users have The Dark Knight an average of 9.0 which is just staggering. The same user base has rated the Marvel movies pretty highly as well actually but not well enough to be in the Top 250. Hundreds of professional critics rate The Dark Knight higher than any superhero movie that's been made. The movie won two Oscars and got 8 nominations. All the MCU movies out together only have 4 nominations between them. There's no comparison to be made. The Academy also gave Best Picture to "Shakespeare in Love" over "Saving Private Ryan". They have credibility. And "professional" critics become more obsolete every year. Nah sorry none of those means anything against my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Sept 2, 2017 20:00:03 GMT
Nah sorry your lone opinion doesn't mean anything against any of this. A total of 1.83 million users have The Dark Knight an average of 9.0 which is just staggering. The same user base has rated the Marvel movies pretty highly as well actually but not well enough to be in the Top 250. Hundreds of professional critics rate The Dark Knight higher than any superhero movie that's been made. The movie won two Oscars and got 8 nominations. All the MCU movies out together only have 4 nominations between them. There's no comparison to be made. The Academy also gave Best Picture to "Shakespeare in Love" over "Saving Private Ryan". They have credibility. And "professional" critics become more obsolete every year. Nah sorry none of those means anything against my opinion. So that's one more Oscar that Shakespeare in Love has than the 16 Marvel movies made so far then. Doesn't have as many as The Dark Knight though. The thing is, you only say this doesn't matter because it works against you because you know I'm right. If I had started saying that Batman vs Superman was better than any Marvel movie then you'd be clad to tell me all about it's shitty reviews and how Marvel movies have superior scores, both critical and user. You're not able to with The Dark Knight though so "it doesn't mean anything".
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2017 20:02:36 GMT
The Academy also gave Best Picture to "Shakespeare in Love" over "Saving Private Ryan". They have credibility. And "professional" critics become more obsolete every year. Nah sorry none of those means anything against my opinion. So that's one more Oscar that Shakespeare in Love has than the 16 Marvel movies made so far then. Doesn't have as many as The Dark Knight though. The thing is, you only say this doesn't matter because it works against you because you know I'm right. If I had started saying that Batman vs Superman was better than any Marvel movie then you'd be clad to tell me all about it's shitty reviews and how Marvel movies have superior scores, both critical and user. You're not able to with The Dark Knight though so "it doesn't mean anything". You are not right and I've been saying the Oscars are worthless since 2000, before I ever saw the first X-Men film. Actually, I've never used reviews or scores, ever, in my arguments. So nice try, but you're wrong yet again. The FoX-Men and DCEU boards are over there.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Sept 2, 2017 20:09:04 GMT
So that's one more Oscar that Shakespeare in Love has than the 16 Marvel movies made so far then. Doesn't have as many as The Dark Knight though. The thing is, you only say this doesn't matter because it works against you because you know I'm right. If I had started saying that Batman vs Superman was better than any Marvel movie then you'd be clad to tell me all about it's shitty reviews and how Marvel movies have superior scores, both critical and user. You're not able to with The Dark Knight though so "it doesn't mean anything". You are not right and I've been saying the Oscars are worthless since 2000, before I ever saw the first X-Men film. Actually, I've never used reviews or scores, ever, in my arguments. So nice try, but you're wrong yet again. The FoX-Men and DCEU boards are over there. Nobody cares if you think the Oscars are worthless. You're a guy on a movie forum and that's it, your opinion holds no weight infront of the hundreds of people in the actual industry who vote on these things. If I'd have said BvS was better than The Avengers you wouldn't have been able to get over to Rotten Tomatoes fast enough. It's the same with everyone, these things never seem to matter when it goes their way.
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Sept 2, 2017 20:22:21 GMT
I think both marvel and dc fans are guilty of this review fake adoration. they only use it when it reflects their marvel and dc movies in a good light.
clearly rt and box office is not working for marvel anymore so the MCU idiots now say it is worthless.
DCEU finally has a movie that 'critics' like so rt and critics are now relevant to them.
both camps are guilty but the mcu idiots are the biggest guilty brats of all. they all used to brag about critics which I find ironic because before MCU many comic films aka X-Men, X2, Batman Begins, The Crow, Batman 1989. all had good reviews but in that era no one ever obsessed about RT and critics. MCU fans made RT a thing because they were fully aware critics kissed MCU ass regardless of the useless stuff they fed to us. things seem to be changing or not?
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Sept 2, 2017 21:08:01 GMT
Marvel made a tremendous mistake when they decided to go against making a movie for this but instead let the Inhumans be a plot point for Agents of Shield which was always a pretty poor show itself. They could have had another Guardians of the Galaxy kind of success with this. Inhumans have enough juicy history to build a TV series on, and with ties to Agents of SHIELD( Which I do genuinely like, just getting it out there) there's plenty of crossover potential. But I'm not sure what they were thinking with this attempt, it's definitely up there as one of the most expensive TV productions in history yet it still feels cheap looking - Attilan doesn't look like a feast for the eyes, and the color grading is extremely muted and almost nothing stands out. Inhumans was Kirby as Jack could do, and given how Thor Ragnarok looks Inhumans could've at least tried to be more Kirby-esque but its more Kirby-muted. I guess there's room for improvement though. I wish the film rights to The Fantastic Four were with Disney, because they have such rich history with The Inhumans - Crystal's been romantically linked with Johnny Storm and Ben Grimm, and both Crystal and Medusa have been FF members. It's because Marvel tv and Marvel movies are together but at the same time not. The tv division got Inhumans. I'm wondering if when we saw Inhumans on their movie timeline it was because of the tv show being in IMAX.
|
|