Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2017 6:43:49 GMT
Rocket Raccoon. He's not even funny. His jokes might make dumb little kids laugh, but mature people would never laugh at his unfunny jokes.
|
|
|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Sept 4, 2017 7:56:16 GMT
Wolverine.
He has claws and he heals quick. so what?
Spider-man sticks to walls and can swing around. The Thing is made of rocks.
Much cooler than Wolverine.
Then again we are talking about the movies arent we?
Hmm actually Wolverine is a good character in the movies. So never mind.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Sept 4, 2017 14:17:36 GMT
I guess at this point, all the Inhumans.
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Sept 4, 2017 14:24:47 GMT
Loki.
|
|
|
Post by thenewnexus on Sept 4, 2017 14:25:52 GMT
Tony Stark and Starlord
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Sept 4, 2017 14:44:18 GMT
uh, the MCU itself, it's hailed by it's fans as the best thing since sliced brains but it's a flat, repetitive and fomulaic universe. A real backstep from serialized storytelling to stand alone films with some unrelated teasers and shoehorned-in character introductions for future films. And it's all gimmick-y anyway as e.g., the connection to the TV shows and films like GotG is hypothetic and without any real consequence.
The Star Trek universe is just as lame since the 60s and some more.
If that does not count, I'll go with the Guardians characters, especially the cringe worthy guy that says "I have sensitive nipples", "I have famously huge turds" and "Did you create a penis?", you cannot spell out lowbrow-kiddy more clearly than with this.
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Sept 4, 2017 14:52:28 GMT
If that does not count, I'll go with the Guardians characters, especially the cringe worthy guy that says "I have sensitive nipples", "I have famously huge turds" and "Did you create a penis?", you cannot spell out lowbrow-kiddy more clearly than with this.
My biggest problem with Wonder Woman is that she didn't talk about her turds enough. They of course would be magical turds.
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Sept 4, 2017 15:08:51 GMT
If that does not count, I'll go with the Guardians characters, especially the cringe worthy guy that says "I have sensitive nipples", "I have famously huge turds" and "Did you create a penis?", you cannot spell out lowbrow-kiddy more clearly than with this.
My biggest problem with Wonder Woman is that she didn't talk about her turds enough. They of course would be magical turds. I know, sostie, but she is just not your kind of gal. She does not believe in itching nipples, squishy turds or magical penises, she believes in love and love alone:
I guess you have a better chance with your dark preferences that she rams her sword into your breast rather than grace you with her wonder woman excrement (but let's see how the next film turns out, you never know with DCEU).
|
|
Peter B. Parker
Sophomore
Watch the hands, not the mouth
@babygroot
Posts: 853
Likes: 411
|
Post by Peter B. Parker on Sept 4, 2017 15:41:43 GMT
Natalie Portman and Kat Dennings' characters.
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Sept 4, 2017 16:29:40 GMT
uh, the MCU itself, it's hailed by it's fans as the best thing since sliced brains but it's a flat, repetitive and fomulaic universe. A real backstep from serialized storytelling to stand alone films with some unrelated teasers and shoehorned-in character introductions for future films. And it's all gimmick-y anyway as e.g., the connection to the TV shows and films like GotG is hypothetic and without any real consequence.
The Star Trek universe is just as lame since the 60s and some more.
If that does not count, I'll go with the Guardians characters, especially the cringe worthy guy that says "I have sensitive nipples", "I have famously huge turds" and "Did you create a penis?", you cannot spell out lowbrow-kiddy more clearly than with this. So if the MCU as a whole is a dud then what particular franchise universe should they strive to be then? I'm just curious... Star Trek is definitely not lame, there are some weak additions to the mythos but its endured this long for good reason, name another sci-fi franchise it should strive to be to avoid being "lame", because from what they're doing to Star Trek Discovery they couldn't have gone in such a wrong direction this side of Star Trek Nemesis. I'll take Drax The Destroyer over the FOX-Men's rendition of Bobby Drake/Iceman and Rogue, that is for sure. Drax at least has a distinguished personality and displays more emotion than being mopey. Him being an alien from a race of aliens whose culture is incredibly distant from everywhere else in the universe leads to many hilarious opportunities( If the jokes bother you, then how would you have gone about it? Lets here you, funny guy). And he can be a real bad-ass, something neither Bobby or Rogue were in the X-Men movies( Even Anna Paquin has apologized to fans about her character not being as big a bad ass as her comic counterpart).
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Sept 4, 2017 19:08:21 GMT
uh, the MCU itself, it's hailed by it's fans as the best thing since sliced brains but it's a flat, repetitive and fomulaic universe. A real backstep from serialized storytelling to stand alone films with some unrelated teasers and shoehorned-in character introductions for future films. And it's all gimmick-y anyway as e.g., the connection to the TV shows and films like GotG is hypothetic and without any real consequence.
The Star Trek universe is just as lame since the 60s and some more.
If that does not count, I'll go with the Guardians characters, especially the cringe worthy guy that says "I have sensitive nipples", "I have famously huge turds" and "Did you create a penis?", you cannot spell out lowbrow-kiddy more clearly than with this. So if the MCU as a whole is a dud then what particular franchise universe should they strive to be then? I'm just curious... Star Trek is definitely not lame, there are some weak additions to the mythos but its endured this long for good reason, name another sci-fi franchise it should strive to be to avoid being "lame", because from what they're doing to Star Trek Discovery they couldn't have gone in such a wrong direction this side of Star Trek Nemesis. I'll take Drax The Destroyer over the FOX-Men's rendition of Bobby Drake/Iceman and Rogue, that is for sure. Drax at least has a distinguished personality and displays more emotion than being mopey. Him being an alien from a race of aliens whose culture is incredibly distant from everywhere else in the universe leads to many hilarious opportunities( If the jokes bother you, then how would you have gone about it? Lets here you, funny guy). And he can be a real bad-ass, something neither Bobby or Rogue were in the X-Men movies( Even Anna Paquin has apologized to fans about her character not being as big a bad ass as her comic counterpart). no, MC is not a dud, but it's LAME in the literal and figurative sense: If there is an overall frame storyline? I guess so? Um, a few scenes with a silly, purple CGI-blob who mimics the big bad about to attack Earth since forever (how original),...and always loses doing so (poor blob)! And also some magical stones a la LotR that help to deus ex machina destroy all enemies by distraction of Dance Off and such? And always the same generic character arcs (From Jerk to Nice Guy Hero) and formula elements repeated ad nauseam. That's it...? This type of sluggish storytelling is the epitome of lame. Get to the point already MCU! What to do better? Just look at all the serialized shows and movie franchises that have a genuine story arc to tell and get to the point. Maybe Star Wars, maybe X-Men 1-3, maybe GoT, maybe Matrix, maybe a hundred others? I was sarcastic regarding Star Trek, it's one of the best, but the serialized storytelling has made giant leaps in the last 3 decades. Lol, "Drax the Destroyer" seriously...? And I thought Conan the Destroyer sounds silly and derivative. Completely disagree on everything and do not see the connection between these characters. And how much would Ms. Paquin have had to apologize if X-Men was actually part of MCU and she had said stuff like "I have sensitive nipples, oh my goodness, my nippples!!! or "Hahahaha, I have famously huge turds" or "Did you create a penis" or "Die spaceship die, Screw you spaceship" etc etc. Hm, how many times...? Any number you can fathom would not nearly be often enough that's how many!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2017 19:30:12 GMT
Wolverine. He has claws and he heals quick. so what? Spider-man sticks to walls and can swing around. The Thing is made of rocks. Much cooler than Wolverine. Then again we are talking about the movies arent we? Hmm actually Wolverine is a good character in the movies. So never mind. Wolverine isn't MCU.
|
|
|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Sept 4, 2017 19:37:15 GMT
Yeah I figured that after I wrote it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2017 19:39:23 GMT
The X-Men as a whole. They just further and further prove themselves irrelevant.
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Sept 4, 2017 19:50:29 GMT
I'll take Drax The Destroyer over the FOX-Men's rendition of Bobby Drake/Iceman and Rogue, that is for sure. Drax at least has a distinguished personality and displays more emotion than being mopey. Drax is a character written with the most cheesiest, most cringe-worthy lines in the whole of the MCU - and that itself takes a lotta effort. Portrayed by a incompetent actor who doesnt even have a fight scene in GotG2 even though his nickname is The Destroyer. Pretty sad you would take him over Bobby Drake whose more fleshed out and given a lot more useful stuff to do than someone who jokes about turds. But cant say im surprised, you will eat anything Feige $hits out.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2017 21:07:40 GMT
The X-Men as a whole. They just further and further prove themselves irrelevant. They're not in the MCU. You know this. Which of the MANY overrated MCU characters do you think is the MOST overrated?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2017 21:58:54 GMT
The X-Men as a whole. They just further and further prove themselves irrelevant. They're not in the MCU. You know this. Which of the MANY overrated MCU characters do you think is the MOST overrated? There are no overrated characters in the MCU. I had to look outside it to find an overrated Marvel character.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2017 22:02:42 GMT
They're not in the MCU. You know this. Which of the MANY overrated MCU characters do you think is the MOST overrated? There are no overrated character in the MCU. I had to look outside it to find an overrated Marvel character.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2017 22:39:42 GMT
Black Widow would be my choice. Sure she is nice to look at but damn do a lot of her one liners take me out of the movie(s) . She is always making lame jokes that aren't remotely funny & her "love" for Bruce Banner was laughable in Age of Ultron . Plus, (I know I know they are just comic book movies) but she is literally beating the shit out of 200+ pound bad guys like its nothing (and doing so without super powers) . Just laughable.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Sept 4, 2017 22:39:44 GMT
I'll take Drax The Destroyer over the FOX-Men's rendition of Bobby Drake/Iceman and Rogue, that is for sure. Drax at least has a distinguished personality and displays more emotion than being mopey. Drax is a character written with the most cheesiest, most cringe-worthy lines in the whole of the MCU - and that itself takes a lotta effort. Portrayed by a incompetent actor who doesnt even have a fight scene in GotG2 even though his nickname is The Destroyer. Pretty sad you would take him over Bobby Drake whose more fleshed out and given a lot more useful stuff to do than someone who jokes about turds. But cant say im surprised, you will eat anything Feige $hits out. "Fleshed out" with that idiotic "coming out" scene in X2? I'll take Drax doing something morally ambiguous like calling Ronan for a duel, thus causing the entire 3rd Act of GOTG, over Bobby's silliness.
|
|