Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2017 20:19:20 GMT
I would only disagree with her by saying only men call women sluts because that is obviously not true. I can really say girls use the term on other girls more than guys do. But its only to degrade them and nothing else. Having sex doesn't make a woman a slut really.. women are only called sluts by people who don't like them and try to bring them down by saying it. its all that it is. Women have been called sluts even when they never had sex before. Sex really has nothing to do with being a "slut" in reality. And I have no idea about owning up to it but I would think its because it letting people know that the word doesn't affect them (and it shouldn't) A slut refers to a promiscuous woman, I can't help it if people use it differently. I would not use the word myself, but I can't say I agree with women or men who are promiscuous. An event celebrating promiscuous behavior won't get my support. But like I said, be a slut, for all I care. Nothing wrong with having sex
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2017 20:20:04 GMT
And the woman's outfit is a stupid excuse. If it's not her outfit then it would just be something else to blame it on. Not as stupid as the woman in the outfit. your opinion
|
|
|
Post by deembastille on Oct 6, 2017 20:48:46 GMT
Not as stupid as the woman in the outfit. your opinion it's my opinion but also your health. if you want to fck around with your health, that is your choice but it will also be my choice not to be gofundingyou for anything you catch.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2017 20:52:43 GMT
it's my opinion but also your health. if you want to fck around with your health, that is your choice but it will also be my choice not to be gofundingyou for anything you catch. like I said theres something called safe sex
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2017 21:40:19 GMT
A slut refers to a promiscuous woman, I can't help it if people use it differently. I would not use the word myself, but I can't say I agree with women or men who are promiscuous. An event celebrating promiscuous behavior won't get my support. But like I said, be a slut, for all I care. Nothing wrong with having sex No one taught you about the risks of casual sex? How sad. Like I said, no wonder the STD numbers have reached a record high.
|
|
|
Post by deembastille on Oct 6, 2017 21:52:36 GMT
it's my opinion but also your health. if you want to fck around with your health, that is your choice but it will also be my choice not to be gofundingyou for anything you catch. like I said theres something called safe sex AND LIKE I SAID BEFORE IT'S CALLED ABSTINENCE!
|
|
|
Post by johnspartan on Oct 6, 2017 22:24:00 GMT
^"I have pole dancing class that day."
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Oct 7, 2017 10:37:19 GMT
Unwanted pregnancy is relatively easy to avoid with birth control (and good birth control education). Plus there are abortions, too. I couldn't disagree with you more on the other point. I think a far more promiscuous culture would be better for everyone. Because birth control is 100% effective? I love how casual you guys are about abortion. Just give in to every carnal pleasure and if it leads to unwanted results, just go through a medical procedure that could possibly end your life. Promiscuity makes the world a better place??? All riiighty... What is it with people being such absolutists? No one said anything about "100% effective." There's nothing you do that doesn't entail some risk. Your chances of dying from an abortion are about the same as your chances of being struck by lightning.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 7, 2017 12:40:45 GMT
Because birth control is 100% effective? I love how casual you guys are about abortion. Just give in to every carnal pleasure and if it leads to unwanted results, just go through a medical procedure that could possibly end your life. Promiscuity makes the world a better place??? All riiighty... What is it with people being such absolutists? No one said anything about "100% effective." There's nothing you do that doesn't entail some risk. Your chances of dying from an abortion are about the same as your chances of being struck by lightning. An absolutist? What kind of ridiculous conclusion is that? If it's not 100% effective, isn't that a good reason NOT to be so casual about it? You said that my main concern should be to cure STD's. I'm saying BS, my MAIN concern should be the measures I can take myself against the negative consequences of promiscuity, which includes everything from STD's to a medical procedure that could potentially end my life. And with every abortion, you're a little step closer to death. I'm not even sure why you would want to put yourself in that situtation just for a little carnal pleasure. It's like purposely standing under a tree when lightening strikes!
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Oct 7, 2017 13:12:12 GMT
An absolutist? What kind of ridiculous conclusion is that? You're the one who introduced it with talk of "100%" No. Again, everything has risks. But we should be casual sometimes. And the negative consequence is STDs. Hence why your concern shuld be to cure STDs. What in the world are you talking about? There are hundreds of thousands of abortions performed every year. Some years no one has died from one. Some years 2 people have. Etc. You must be really paranoid every time you walk outside if you're worried about odds like that. Heck, not even walking outside. Do you get really paranoid when you, say, plug in an appliance?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 7, 2017 13:47:53 GMT
An absolutist? What kind of ridiculous conclusion is that? You're the one who introduced it with talk of "100%" No. Again, everything has risks. But we should be casual sometimes. And the negative consequence is STDs. Hence why your concern shuld be to cure STDs. What in the world are you talking about? There are hundreds of thousands of abortions performed every year. Some years no one has died from one. Some years 2 people have. Etc. You must be really paranoid every time you walk outside if you're worried about odds like that. Heck, not even walking outside. Do you get really paranoid when you, say, plug in an appliance? So what if I introduced it? If it's not 100% effective and the results could be huge, you shouldn't take extra precautions? I don't think you need to be an absolutist for that. The more promiscuous you are, the higher the risks. Okay, again, better to rely on myself than others. As of now, there are still STD's that can't be cured. So my MAIN concern should be the measures I can take myself. That doesn't mean I don't care about a cure, but it's ridiculous to suggest I should mainly be concerned with something I can do very little about myself. The more abortions you have, the more chance you have of becoming part of the fatality numbers. An abortion can potentially kill you or damage your body. So can pregnancy. These are not things to be casual about, why be reckless with your body? I'm not religious or anti-abortion, but I find the mentality of abortion being a quick fix for the creation of life, like removing a wart, pretty disgusting. Well, I certainly keep my appliances dry and pay attention to the condition of the plugs, cables and sockets. And are you seriously comparing taking a walk with behavior of which the risks are known? I definitely don't walk a red light thinking the doctors will know how to fix me up if I get hit...
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Oct 7, 2017 14:00:42 GMT
So what if I introduced it? I'm not going to continue an increasingly lengthy back and forth with you. Let's settle one thing at a time and move on. "So what if I introduced it." So that's why I brought up "absolutist." I was referring to you bringing up the "100%" idea. 100% x is "absolutely x." Is that clear now?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 7, 2017 14:13:56 GMT
So what if I introduced it? I'm not going to continue an increasingly lengthy back and forth with you. Let's settle one thing at a time and move on. "So what if I introduced it." So that's why I brought up "absolutist." I was referring to you bringing up the "100%" idea. 100% x is "absolutely x." Is that clear now? I guess every medical expert is an absolutist for saying that birth control isn't 100% effective?
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Oct 7, 2017 14:45:00 GMT
I'm not going to continue an increasingly lengthy back and forth with you. Let's settle one thing at a time and move on. "So what if I introduced it." So that's why I brought up "absolutist." I was referring to you bringing up the "100%" idea. 100% x is "absolutely x." Is that clear now? I guess every medical expert is an absolutist for saying that birth control isn't 100% effective? If they're focusing on 100% for some reason as if that's important, then they're being absolutists in that regard, yes. Okay, so are we clear on that part so we can move on?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 7, 2017 15:06:33 GMT
I guess every medical expert is an absolutist for saying that birth control isn't 100% effective? If they're focusing on 100% for some reason as if that's important, then they're being absolutists in that regard, yes. Okay, so are we clear on that part so we can move on? Of course it's important! If it doesn't work, you have a huge chance of getting pregnant. Apparently half of British women who undergo abortions were using birth control. Also, I don't think you know what absolutism means. It's not saying that birth control should be 100% effective (which I never did).
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Oct 7, 2017 17:09:02 GMT
If they're focusing on 100% for some reason as if that's important, then they're being absolutists in that regard, yes. Okay, so are we clear on that part so we can move on? Of course it's important! If it doesn't work, you have a huge chance of getting pregnant. Apparently half of British women who undergo abortions were using birth control. Also, I don't think you know what absolutism means. It's not saying that birth control should be 100% effective (which I never did). Here's are a few definitions of "absolute": "not qualified or diminished in any way; total" -- that's from Google "free from imperfection", "having no restriction, exception, or qualification" - that's from Merriam Webster "free from imperfection; complete; perfect" - that's from dictionary.com Do you agree that those are definitions of "absolute"?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 7, 2017 17:40:36 GMT
Of course it's important! If it doesn't work, you have a huge chance of getting pregnant. Apparently half of British women who undergo abortions were using birth control. Also, I don't think you know what absolutism means. It's not saying that birth control should be 100% effective (which I never did). Here's are a few definitions of "absolute": "not qualified or diminished in any way; total" -- that's from Google "free from imperfection", "having no restriction, exception, or qualification" - that's from Merriam Webster "free from imperfection; complete; perfect" - that's from dictionary.com Do you agree that those are definitions of "absolute"? "100%" is absolute. Saying the words "100%" does not make a person an "absolutist". And I don't see at all how stating that "birth control is not 100% effective" is in any way an absolute. Wouldn't it be the opposite as it acknowledges that birth control is not perfect?
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Oct 7, 2017 17:56:02 GMT
Here's are a few definitions of "absolute": "not qualified or diminished in any way; total" -- that's from Google "free from imperfection", "having no restriction, exception, or qualification" - that's from Merriam Webster "free from imperfection; complete; perfect" - that's from dictionary.com Do you agree that those are definitions of "absolute"? Saying the words "100%" does not make a person an "absolutist". [Later edit: actually, you didn't answer my question. I should have just asked you again. Do you agree that those are definitions of the term absolute? Yes or no. I didn't ask you rhetorically. I consider it rude to not answer. At any rate--on with the response I let you troll me into instead:) I agree with that. What I'd say is this: Responding to "Unwanted pregnancy is relatively easy to avoid with birth control (and good birth control education)" with "Because birth control is 100% effective?" is absolutist in that regard. Now, apparently you believe this is false. What makes it false in your view? What's the truthmaker for this situation?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 7, 2017 19:16:43 GMT
Saying the words "100%" does not make a person an "absolutist". [Later edit: actually, you didn't answer my question. I should have just asked you again. Do you agree that those are definitions of the term absolute? Yes or no. I didn't ask you rhetorically. I consider it rude to not answer. At any rate--on with the response I let you troll me into instead:) I agree with that. What I'd say is this: Responding to "Unwanted pregnancy is relatively easy to avoid with birth control (and good birth control education)" with "Because birth control is 100% effective?" is absolutist in that regard. Now, apparently you believe this is false. What makes it false in your view? What's the truthmaker for this situation? Haha, I'm rude and a troll for not saying yes or no? I replied that "100%" is absolute and that's the answer you have to do with. No, pointing out that unwanted pregnancy is still a problem because birth control is not 100% effective is not absolutist in any regard. Not according to the true meaning of the word and not even according to your made up definition.
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Oct 7, 2017 21:46:48 GMT
[Later edit: actually, you didn't answer my question. I should have just asked you again. Do you agree that those are definitions of the term absolute? Yes or no. I didn't ask you rhetorically. I consider it rude to not answer. At any rate--on with the response I let you troll me into instead:) I agree with that. What I'd say is this: Responding to "Unwanted pregnancy is relatively easy to avoid with birth control (and good birth control education)" with "Because birth control is 100% effective?" is absolutist in that regard. Now, apparently you believe this is false. What makes it false in your view? What's the truthmaker for this situation? Haha, I'm rude and a troll for not saying yes or no? Wow, your reading comprehension sucks. I consider it rude to not answer a question that was asked, as it was asked. You're a troll per your general behavior instead.
|
|