|
|
Post by scabab on Dec 30, 2017 3:44:35 GMT
For real? Is this some kind of joke? Are you going to wipe his nose now too? Stop whining. It doesn't concern nor does it involve you, continue on with your usual posting habits and don't escalate matters. |
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Dec 30, 2017 5:17:47 GMT
For real? Is this some kind of joke? Are you going to wipe his nose now too? Stop whining. It doesn't concern nor does it involve you, continue on with your usual posting habits and don't escalate matters. No one is whining or escalating anything, scabab. A concerned community member is pointing out your continued support and favoritism of a frequent instigator of bait threads. All I'm asking for is for you to do your job. |
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Dec 30, 2017 5:51:25 GMT
No one is whining or escalating anything, scabab . A concerned community member is pointing out your continued support and favoritism of a frequent instigator of bait threads. All I'm asking for is for you to do your job. Yes you are, you're extending the point of discussion for no reason. He made his comment, I explained why he shouldn't have, that was it. It's over with. Continue with the point of the topic. |
|
|
|
Post by seahawksraawk00 on Dec 30, 2017 12:00:44 GMT
See this is the kind of thing that gets you all this hostility, which you bring on yourself, by saying these things you know aren't true Not true? SMH is awful, I do believe that's true. As for the title change, I'm going by what IMDb has as the official title of the movie.
Also, MCU fans have no right to complain about what I say when they continually make up bullshit that they know isn't true. For example, King Kong Shady falsely claimed that WB wouldn't have made Wonder Woman if MCU hadn't announced Captain Marvel first. I proved that was bullshit by providing multiple links showing that WB announced to shareholders they were producing Wonder Woman two weeks before MCU announced they were producing Captain Marvel.
Then King Kong Shady tried to adjust his bullshit and basically accused WB's board of lying to shareholders about their intent to produce Wonder Woman (which would be a federal crime because shareholders are the legal owners of a company and the SEC considers knowingly lying to shareholders to be fraud). But that was also proven false by the fact that WB not only produced Wonder Woman as they announced to shareholders they would, but also since the project was ahead of schedule they were able to move the release date three weeks earlier.
So if you're going to blame anyone for saying things they know aren't true just to stir up trouble, then you really should start with King Kong Shady and some of the other MCU fans here.
Your opinion isn't true, it's just your opinion and Summer of George is just a working title like all films have when they first go into production you stupid piece of shit. You're not fuckin' fooling anyone |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Dec 30, 2017 14:26:39 GMT
Not true? SMH is awful, I do believe that's true. As for the title change, I'm going by what IMDb has as the official title of the movie.
Also, MCU fans have no right to complain about what I say when they continually make up bullshit that they know isn't true. For example, King Kong Shady falsely claimed that WB wouldn't have made Wonder Woman if MCU hadn't announced Captain Marvel first. I proved that was bullshit by providing multiple links showing that WB announced to shareholders they were producing Wonder Woman two weeks before MCU announced they were producing Captain Marvel.
Then King Kong Shady tried to adjust his bullshit and basically accused WB's board of lying to shareholders about their intent to produce Wonder Woman (which would be a federal crime because shareholders are the legal owners of a company and the SEC considers knowingly lying to shareholders to be fraud). But that was also proven false by the fact that WB not only produced Wonder Woman as they announced to shareholders they would, but also since the project was ahead of schedule they were able to move the release date three weeks earlier.
So if you're going to blame anyone for saying things they know aren't true just to stir up trouble, then you really should start with King Kong Shady and some of the other MCU fans here.
Your opinion isn't true, it's just your opinion and Summer of George is just a working title like all films have when they first go into production you stupid piece of shit. You're not fuckin' fooling anyone Come on, don't rise to him. |
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Dec 30, 2017 15:13:04 GMT
Personally I liked Homecoming more. ASM 2 had too much going on between multiple villians and the world building with sinister six.
It suffered the same way The Mummy 2017 did.
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Dec 30, 2017 20:30:10 GMT
See this is the kind of thing that gets you all this hostility, which you bring on yourself, by saying these things you know aren't true Also, MCU fans have no right to complain about what I say when they continually make up bullshit that they know isn't true. For example, King Kong Shady falsely claimed that WB wouldn't have made Wonder Woman if MCU hadn't announced Captain Marvel first. Don't lie, cupcake. Link to postAs anyone can clearly see, I claimed no such thing. A question is not a claim. The rest of your post is a ridiculous reinvention of an argument that you thoroughly lost, and then fled from ... with your tail between your legs. |
|
|
|
Post by DSDSquared on Jan 3, 2018 16:35:51 GMT
Jesus this ridiculous thread is still going on? Anyone who believes that TASM 2 is better than SM:HC needs to get their head examined.
|
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Jan 4, 2018 16:45:32 GMT
The amount of action by itself is not the deciding factor in how good or bad a movie is.
|
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Jan 4, 2018 17:24:13 GMT
This issue depends heavily on your age and experience with the movies. Some people are going to see the Raimi films as untouchable because they've become these weirdly nostalgic artifacts. When I saw them as a preteen/early teen they were state-of-the-art, colorful and fun. I watch them now and I find them to be very much like the Evil Dead movies. They have this weird balance of camp, slapstick and melodrama that only Raimi could have pulled off. They are almost too much like reading a comic book from the mid sixties/early seventies. That's why I truly love Raimi's work. He's a master of balancing those 3 elements in an entertaining way. Also, you talk about the Raimi Spider-Man movies as if they are from Hollywood's golden age or something. They're not that old! |
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Jan 4, 2018 18:06:50 GMT
This issue depends heavily on your age and experience with the movies. Some people are going to see the Raimi films as untouchable because they've become these weirdly nostalgic artifacts. When I saw them as a preteen/early teen they were state-of-the-art, colorful and fun. I watch them now and I find them to be very much like the Evil Dead movies. They have this weird balance of camp, slapstick and melodrama that only Raimi could have pulled off. They are almost too much like reading a comic book from the mid sixties/early seventies. That's why I truly love Raimi's work. He's a master of balancing those 3 elements in an entertaining way. Also, you talk about the Raimi Spider-Man movies as if they are from Hollywood's golden age or something. They're not that old! I was very young when I saw them, I know they're not that old but they sort of feel that way. |
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Jan 4, 2018 18:29:05 GMT
Unpopular opinion: out of all 6 Spiderman the one I find completely unwatchable is the first Raimi one
|
|
|
|
Post by darkpast on Feb 4, 2018 4:58:01 GMT
ASM2 is kinda fun, i like the cast, but it doesn't all work. Homecoming has weaker cast besides Keaton and is too generic with Iron Man shoehorned in.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jedan Archer on Feb 4, 2018 6:54:58 GMT
I think both are equally bad and forgettable having different flaws and issues, but then again I did not really like any Spiderman film, not even the good ones, except maybe 1. Just have outgrown that age I guess.
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Feb 4, 2018 13:15:12 GMT
Homecoming has the benefit of seeing Spidey in a new environment where he's not the only superhero around and he's adjusting to that, whereas the older movies just ignored that potential for...reasons, I guess.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Feb 4, 2018 15:25:22 GMT
Sam Raimi Harry Osbourne is superior to that crappy emo Harry Osbourne that we got in ASM2.
Infact Sam Raimi Spider-Man movies are still the superior films, just like Chris Nolan Batman films are the superior films.
|
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Feb 4, 2018 16:20:58 GMT
ASM 2 sucked whereas Homecoming allegedly stuck to the paint by numbers MCU formula and slapped Iron Man all over its posters so it got the benefit of the doubt from the stunted neckbeard losers and literal children who comprise the viewing audience of the MCU.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Feb 4, 2018 17:37:58 GMT
ASM 2 sucked whereas Homecoming allegedly stuck to the paint by numbers MCU formula and slapped Iron Man all over its posters so it got the benefit of the doubt from the stunted neckbeard losers and literal children who comprise the viewing audience of the MCU. kudos, that describes it well. I can only say that I can barely remember anything from both movies, except that the love interest died in one (which was ok done and she stayed dead which would be unthinkable under mcu regimes) - and on the other hand that Iron Man was the worst mentor ever in Homecoming mostly delegating his mentorship to his obese aid (likely as RDJ was too expensive to be more in the pic) and that it looked generic like a pilot for a TV show. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Feb 4, 2018 18:39:19 GMT
ASM 2 sucked whereas Homecoming allegedly stuck to the paint by numbers MCU formula and slapped Iron Man all over its posters so it got the benefit of the doubt from the stunted neckbeard losers and literal children who comprise the viewing audience of the MCU. kudos, that describes it well. I can only say that I can barely remember anything from both movies, except that the love interest died in one (which was ok done and she stayed dead which would be unthinkable under mcu regimes) - and on the other hand that Iron Man was the worst mentor ever in Homecoming mostly delegating his mentorship to his obese aid (likely as RDJ was too expensive to be more in the pic) and that it looked generic like a pilot for a TV show. I remember finding the Gwen death kind of... I dunno. Something about it didn't sit right with me. It didn't feel as though it was done well even though it was done "correctly" for the most part. |
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Feb 4, 2018 18:46:36 GMT
kudos, that describes it well. I can only say that I can barely remember anything from both movies, except that the love interest died in one (which was ok done and she stayed dead which would be unthinkable under mcu regimes) - and on the other hand that Iron Man was the worst mentor ever in Homecoming mostly delegating his mentorship to his obese aid (likely as RDJ was too expensive to be more in the pic) and that it looked generic like a pilot for a TV show. I remember finding the Gwen death kind of... I dunno. Something about it didn't sit right with me. It didn't feel as though it was done well even though it was done "correctly" for the most part. you are probably right, but with these Marvel films I am already grateful if somebody ever dies and if so actually has the decency to stay dead. So from that point of view it was an ok character death for me. |
|
