|
Post by damngumby on Feb 9, 2019 13:59:43 GMT
Now it's "winning percentage". You can't keep your story straight, can you cupcake? The '72 Dolphins 17 game win streak became a footnote in NFL history the moment the Patriots won #18. Nope, it's 18*-1 that has become the footnote while 17-0 is still the greatest season in NFL history and the standard by which all other seasons are measured by. When the 2011 Packers started 13-0, the talk was about whether the Packers could join the Dolphins as the only undefeated team in NF history and not about whether the Packers could go 18-1. Sorry, Always Wrong. No one cares about an undefeated season. Ask any player or coach and they will all scoff at the notion that undefeated is important to them. And when the 2011 Packers were on their winning streak, the only significant comparison was whether they could best the 21 game winning streak set by the Patriots. 2011 Green Bay PackersGreen Bay Packers Undefeated SeasonNot one mention of the '72 Dolphins. That's because everyone (but you) understands how irrelevant they became after their lowly 17 game win streak was crushed by the Patriots. Once again, DC-Fan = Always Wrong
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 9, 2019 1:39:52 GMT
When determining the greatest single season in NFL history, it's winning percentage that's important. Now it's "winning percentage". You can't keep your story straight, can you cupcake? The '72 Dolphins 17 game win streak became a footnote in NFL history the moment the Patriots won #18. It's pretty pathetic when the "greatest single season in NFL history" couldn't even take home a consolation prize today.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 8, 2019 23:41:07 GMT
it's not the 17 or 18 wins that's important. It's the ZERO LOSSES vs ONE LOSS that's important. Which is utter nonsense. When determining who holds the greatest undefeated single season win streak in NFL history, it's the wins that are counted. What sort of moron would count the loses? Whatever season length related accolade you wish to bestow upon the '72 Dolphins, it ended when the NFL added more games to the season. These days, 17 wins won't even get you the consolation prize of a Conference Championship.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 8, 2019 9:33:13 GMT
you're trying to claim that ONE LOSS is better than ZERO LOSSES Wrong again, Always Wrong. I've repeatedly "claimed" two things ... that few people, other than you, would disagree with. 1. 18 > 17 2. It's always better to win the World Championship. That means the Patriots hold the title for the greatest undefeated single season win streak in NFL history.
It also means that any team that wins the Super Bowl had a "better" season than the team that didn't. Apparently, everyone gets it ... but you.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 8, 2019 1:34:35 GMT
you keep intentionally leaving off the L part of the W-L records. When talking about the greatest undefeated single season win streak, an L simply means the streak has come to an end. No team has ever bested the Patriots in that regard, including the '72 Dolphins. That is a fact that is not in dispute. You're probably the only person (excluding the clinically retarded) who can't figure out that 18 > 17.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 7, 2019 23:40:19 GMT
King Kong Shady tries to claim that losing the Super Bowl is better than going 17-0 and winning the Super Bowl. LOL!!! That's the 3rd time you got it wrong, Always Wrong. You really can't get anything right, can you cupcake. Tell us again how 17 > 18 ... 'cause that never gets old! ![](https://s26.postimg.cc/tek3suwt5/laugh.gif)
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 7, 2019 17:18:48 GMT
your weak claim that starting 18-0 and losing the Super Bowl is much worse than going 17-0 and winning the Super Bowl. Holy smokes! You're one confused individual. ![](https://s26.postimg.cc/tek3suwt5/laugh.gif) The funny think is, I never made either claim. It is always better to win the Super Bowl. I made that quite clear in my previous post. Are you having difficulty keeping up?
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 7, 2019 13:06:06 GMT
I don't know (or care) about the teams you are talking about, cupcake. No doubt it is another one of your poor attempts at deflection. 18 > 17 means the Patriots undefeated win streak is > the Dolphins undefeated win streak. That is a fact even you can not deny. The length of a win streak in independent of whose season was "better". It's always "better" to win a World Championship. That is why the Patriots seasons, 2001, 2003, 2004, 2014, 2016, 2018, are all "better" than 2007 ... despite the Patriots breaking the record that year for the greatest single season undefeated win streak in NFL history. That's also why we Patriots fans are so happy these days! ... And why you're so bitter.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 7, 2019 5:57:47 GMT
I'm trying to impart a little simple math upon you, cupcake. 18 will always be greater than 17. Go ahead, look it up in your playschool math book. The length on an NFL season could change tomorrow. The greatest undefeated single season win streak belongs to the Patriots. The numbers do not lie. 18 > 17. WOW! You Pats fans are so jealous of the Dolphins going undefeated that you're now lying and claiming the Pats had an undefeated season when the fact is the Pats have never had an undefeated season. 18 > 17 is no lie. Just like 5 > 4. Oh, wait ... 6 > 4. Simple. Math. I mean, it's nice that the Dolphins got a prize after their little win streak ... they have so few ... and the Patriots are still trying to find room for all of theirs.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 6, 2019 23:48:36 GMT
18-0 > 17-0 Once the Patriots achieved 18-0, their undefeated streak topped that of the Dolphins. Have somone explain the math to you. LOL! You're trying to compare a partial saeaon to a full season. I'm trying to impart a little simple math upon you, cupcake. 18 will always be greater than 17. Go ahead, look it up in your playschool math book. The length on an NFL season could change tomorrow. The greatest undefeated single season win streak belongs to the Patriots. The numbers do not lie. 18 > 17. Now, one could argue that it's not the Dolphins fault that they could only do 17 wins, but I don't really care to listen to your excuses. 18 > 17. Write it down. Study it.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 6, 2019 13:15:56 GMT
Is Always Wrong still trying to peddle the notion that going undefeated through 17 games is more impressive than going undefeated through 18 games? What a dope. Yes, going 17-0 is definitrly more impressive than going 18*-1. Only an idiot would think 18*-1 is better than 17-0. 18-0 > 17-0 Once the Patriots achieved 18-0, their undefeated streak topped that of the Dolphins. Have somone explain the math to you.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 6, 2019 12:48:16 GMT
I am not an American and started watching NFL only 3 years ago. I am still not very knowledgeable of the game but I like it and at least one thing I have figured out. That New England Patriots are very good and achieve so much success simply because they are that good. The exaggeration that they have won Super Bowls because of cheating seems ridiculous now. I am not a fan of Patriots but still I am not so foolish as not to understand that they are very talented side and their quarterback is awesome. Sometimes, it is easy to spread lies when majority people indulge in that lie. On IMDB boards so many people used to say Patriots are cheaters and win by cheating that even I bought into their lie. That said, I am personally a fan of Russell Wilson and support Seattle. But I needed to give my views as an objective person. That Patriots achieve things because of cheating is the greatest lie ever told. The entire "cheater" thing has always been the childish reaction of those sports fans who have difficulty dealing with disappointment. They lash out at the success of others. You see that sort of behavior among upset children all the time. I've alway found it odd when an adult acts that way. I don't think it's a coincidence that the biggest crybaby on the Sports forum still plays with his comic book superhero action figures.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 6, 2019 2:34:30 GMT
Chris Evans is a huge Patriots fan. Figures, Julian Edelman is a lot like Captain America. They both owe their success to PEDs. Except Julian Edelman is still a midget.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 6, 2019 2:33:33 GMT
The Rams HAVE a decent offense. One of the best in the league. The Patriots just stopped them. I didn't say "decent offense". I said "decent offensive performance". In other words, any team that would have scored more points than the Patriots, would have won the game. Why didn't anyone else think of that?!
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 6, 2019 2:24:39 GMT
Dolphins played 2 less games. Doesn't matter. Is Always Wrong still trying to peddle the notion that going undefeated through 17 games is more impressive than going undefeated through 18 games? What a dope.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 5, 2019 23:18:59 GMT
I wonder how many balls Brady bad deflated this time. I can think of two (well, four). Warrenpeace and DC-Fan. No balls. Totally deflated.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 5, 2019 23:14:34 GMT
Oh dear, it looks like Dazed & Confused (aka WarrenPeace) still doesn't understand that the point of this thread is to mock and ridicule Always Wrong (aka DC-Fan, aka the horses mouth) when he said that a Patriots victory would be like the '72 Dolphins undefeated season, or Joe DiMaggio's 56 game hitting streak. Of course, that was back when he bet the ranch that the Rams would win with their "unstoppable" offense. Doh!
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 5, 2019 19:53:16 GMT
No, you just keep whining about asterisks that aren't there, except in the minds of halfwits. This is not a "historic achievement." Not from a team that has a reputation for cheating. Not after the Packers won the very first two Super Bowls as back to back wins. And not after the Packers have already won 13 NFL championships. The most of all football teams. Not after the Steelers had already won 6 SBs first. And WTF does a hitting streak in BASEBALL have anything to do with football? This is an apples to oranges comparison in a lame reaching attempt at bragging rights. And comparing this to the '72 Dolphins? There is none. That team was and still is better since they did it without cheating and have an unblemished record. You Cheatriot fans and supporters are really obnoxious. talk to the horse, dazed & confused.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 5, 2019 12:44:18 GMT
The scary thing - they ain't done yet! Yes, yes they are. Lots of folks just finished eating those very words. On to #7!
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 5, 2019 12:36:05 GMT
Wow!You Patripts fans are really dumb. You don't even know what "evenly-matched" means. "Evenly-matched" means there was no prohibitive favorite going into the game, no 18*-0 invincible juggernaut against a double-digit underdog. Just 2 teams that were great all season. That's why the point spread was so low, which means that I was 100% correct. LOL! DC-Fan (aka Always Wrong) never misses an opportunity to shoot himself in the foot. If the point spread is the indicator of how "evenly matched" a game is, then the biggest prohibitive favorite in SB history was not the 2007 Patriots. There have been four bigger point spreads. And of those four, the greatest win by the underdog goes to ... The New England Patriots! (2001)
|
|