|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 14, 2024 16:47:34 GMT
But there were graves, this can't be contradicted. And that suggests a degree of denial is taking place. Graves are not dug without reason. And graves can have their contents exhumed and removed--which may not be all that surprising if the possibility exists that they may yield up some unpleasant facts if exhumed by the 'wrong people': those pesky sorts who might want to inquire as to what really happened at that site. Yes amyghost, there were graves. But, upon excavation, there were no BODIES OF MISSING CHILDREN in any of them, like Trudeau & others had the media & the public believe!!!! Justin Trudeau & Co.'s monologues & all over all performances (ie: Trudeau kneeling down at these cemeteries with a teddy bear ((( ))) brought out the anarchy in Canadians right across the country, with numerous Churches being burned to the ground (like OffTheBoatPsycho already mentioned), - SOME OF WHICH BELONGED TO TO FIRST NATIONS CANADIANS - & others being vandalized & received threats (such as the one that I attend). Native American/First Nation graves used to be marked with *WOODEN* crosses, which easily rot away, which would probably explain why these graves were unmarked upon discovery at these residential schools. Just in one year in Nova Scotia. In the past year, Abandoned Cemeteries of Nova Scotia has charted nearly 100 burial sites scattered across the province, from the far reaches of Cape Breton to Skafte's stomping grounds in Annapolis Valley, which has so many plots he refers to it as "the dead centre."
A cemetery is considered "abandoned" if it doesn't receive regular maintenance, but the overgrowth on many sites is so impenetrable that Skafte presumes they haven't been touched in decades.
The graveyards tend to be tucked away in tangled woods, on precarious hilltops or along the edges of untended fields, he said. Some tombstones date back to the 18th century, and many have shattered or sunk into the soil as the coffins beneath them rotted and collapsed.www.ctvnews.ca/lifestyle/gone-and-forgotten-the-history-buried-in-nova-scotia-s-abandoned-cemeteries-1.5636107
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 14, 2024 16:42:13 GMT
Black students at a university in Canada are an oppressed group in 2024? How so? You need to go put something on those pavement-burn marks on your knuckles, Adolph. How is an African from a rich family in Nigeria who chose to study in Canada oppressed? Why would the African student need a segregated space?
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 14, 2024 3:03:58 GMT
Hmm, I noticed they have a large part on segregation. Doesn't appear to be supportive of it like you. You're too stupid to figure out that recognition of the right of an oppressed group to have its narratives and realities respected in the present doesn't equate to 'support of segregation', as you're cynically attempting to use the phrase. Jesus. Go back to Stormfront already. You really are a sterling example of the cretinous 'thinking' that place harbors among its room-temperature IQ user base. Black students at a university in Canada are an oppressed group in 2024? How so?
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 14, 2024 2:49:34 GMT
Don't be so sure about that: www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/anti-black-racism-in-canadaI have no doubt OTBP wouldn't particularly like you to be aware of any of that. He's still blathering away, but at this point his Nazi/MRA dribble bores me, and he's not getting any further responses. As for Lorrie Goldstein, he's a climate-change denier and biased hack. Anything with his byline on it is going to be greeted with a high level of skepticism by me. Hmm, I noticed they have a large part on segregation. Doesn't appear to be supportive of it like you.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 13, 2024 21:50:37 GMT
BRENTFORD v LIVERPOOL A BURNLEY v ARSENAL A FULHAM v ASTON VILLA A NEWCASTLE v BOURNEMOUTH H NOTTM FOREST v WEST HAM A TOTTENHAM v WOLVES H MAN CITY v CHELSEA H SHEFF UTD v BRIGHTON A LUTON v MAN UTD A EVERTON v CRYSTAL PALACE H *** MAN CITY v BRENTFORD H LIVERPOOL v LUTON H ASTON VILLA v NOTTM FOREST H BRIGHTON v EVERTON A CRYSTAL PALACE v BURNLEY D MAN UTD v FULHAM H BOURNEMOUTH v MAN CITY A ARSENAL v NEWCASTLE H WOLVES v SHEFF UTD H WEST HAM v BRENTFORD H
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 13, 2024 20:39:17 GMT
Even though I have not posted in well over a week (my laptop was in the shop), I managed to follow the discussion between you & OffTheBoatPsycho, as well as transfuged. Pretty interesting discussion the 3 of you got going on here. In regards to this all Black fitness centre: Well, there are all women's fitness centres, & there all men's fitness centres. However, physical anatomy of both men & women are different. By contrast, the only real difference in regards to anatomy between the races are pigments of skin, & little else. Therefore, in what purpose, would an all Black fitness centre or an all White fitness centre, or even an all Oriental fitness centre serve? And yes, historically White people have been completely horrible to Black people (see the topic thread I just made today, for one such example), however, have Oriental people mistreated Black people? If not, in what way would be okay to not allow them from using the same fitness centres as Black people? The problem with OTBP's narrative is that it's not impelled by any real issues with exclusivity in group settings, per se. It's grounded in the fact that any minority group dares to deny Whites, and particularly White males, access to them at any time. There is a vastly different narrative pertaining between such as scenarios as involves White/Black in the US and Blacks/Other ethnic and racial groups. The history is not there with those groups as it is with Whites. You mean breaking law by denying a person their civil rights due to skin color, racial segregation, discrimination based on skin color, violating school policy on inclusion etc? Yeah, that's a problem. Are you in favor of all those things?
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 13, 2024 20:33:42 GMT
I'm pretty sure OffTheBoatPsycho would have cried for them too (any Christian would; the truth is, it doesn't matter the race it matters that it is a House Of God & we are all brothers & sisters in the faith). He's been conspicuous by his absence in showing any of those tears. However, the tears he sheds for any perceived threat to White male supremacy and privilege are loud, long, and highly visible here. Until he shows anything to indicate otherwise, I rank him as the worst sort of MAGA phony, hiding behind false 'sympathy' as a painfully transparent mask for his bigotry towards all non-Whites and his extreme hatred that they dare have the temerity to seek equality now, as well as to have their own narratives of their pasts recognized. He can crawl back to Naziland AFAIC, and good riddance. Race baiting meaningless drivel.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 13, 2024 20:32:43 GMT
I'll keep asking why you support racial segregation, racial discrimination, civil rights violations and violations of racial inclusion policy at Waterloo university. I'll also keep asking why black students need their own racially segregated swim class. All you give is the usual race card playing gibberish. Keep repeating yourself. I'm betting your MRA buds over at Stormfront are marveling at your rhetorical skills right about now. I'll keep asking why you support racial segregation, racial discrimination, civil rights violations and violations of racial inclusion policy at Waterloo university. I'll also keep asking why black students need their own racially segregated swim class. All you give is the usual race card playing gibberish.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 13, 2024 20:32:13 GMT
Touching how your only interest in transpeople/immigrants/women is when you get that bonanza opportunity to demonize all three groups in one person. How many All-American White males have committed mass shootings recently? And where were your tears when Black churches were being burned in common occurences in the South? You're so full of shit you'd burst if stuck with a pin. Take your crocodile tears and weep them at someone who's taken in by your hypocrisy and phony outrage. White male shooters? Check out the stat when you don't conveniently leave out drive by shootings. Then check out the murder rates committed by black male's vs every other demographic. I condemn the burning of black churches. We're talking about the massive number of attacks on churches in present day Canada.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 12, 2024 18:43:48 GMT
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 12, 2024 18:40:18 GMT
I've acknowledged bad things that happened to people in the past. I've acknowledged bad things that happen in the present. I've acknowledged that racism is bad no matter the victim or the aggressor. Do you support racial segregation, racial discrimination, civil rights violations and violations of racial inclusion policy at Waterloo university. If not, why not? Once you take to repeating posts verbatim, I know you've run out of counter arguments. You don't give a rat's ass about equality, justice, civil liberties, or rights, except as they can be used to prop up and maintain the privileges of White men now and forever. Thanks for making your position on this abundantly clear. I'll keep asking why you support racial segregation, racial discrimination, civil rights violations and violations of racial inclusion policy at Waterloo university. I'll also keep asking why black students need their own racially segregated swim class. All you give is the usual race card playing gibberish.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 11, 2024 22:16:58 GMT
Amy reminds me of those heads of university who just could not condemn calls for the genocide of Jews by their own students. They'd twist, squirm and jump through hoops to do anything but condemn calls for genocide. For most people it's easy but they just could not do it. For some reason Amy can't acknowledge and condemn racial segregation at Waterloo because the victims are not black, and the people who benefit from this discrimination are not white. For Amy there is only one group who can be racist. The only failure to acknowledge around here is your ongoing failure to acknowledge both historical and present-day facts about the treatment of minority groups in the US, using your ongoing rubric of de jure segregation as being the greatest of all evils because White men are experiencing something--in a small way--of the inequality non-Whites (and non-males) have experienced throughout the history of the nation. You really think the argument you keep putting up more than answers that fact. I've acknowledged and condemned bad things that happened in the past. I'll do it again; I condemn bad things that happened in the past. Now let's get back to the present. Racial segregation is bad, against the law, violates civil rights and goes against school policy. Given all that is it not wrong to have racial segregation in a university that otherwise condemns racism of any kind? If not, please explain why.
And when have you condemned any of those same 'bad things' that are happening to non-White, non-males in the ongoing present? Oh, that's right...you haven't. And if you've taken to quoting transfuged to back your position, I don't give much for your chances at persuading anyone of your credibility. I've acknowledged bad things that happened to people in the past. I've acknowledged bad things that happen in the present. I've acknowledged that racism is bad no matter the victim or the aggressor. Do you support racial segregation, racial discrimination, civil rights violations and violations of racial inclusion policy at Waterloo university. If not, why not?
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 11, 2024 21:13:21 GMT
Amyghost When and where has Off the boat psycho expressed denial of segregation ? Denial of historical facts ? Appart from in your humble opinion, and you have the right to opinion. Please, dear tell us. Mistakes happen. Amy reminds me of those heads of university who just could not condemn calls for the genocide of Jews by their own students. They'd twist, squirm and jump through hoops to do anything but condemn calls for genocide. For most people it's easy but they just could not do it. For some reason Amy can't acknowledge and condemn racial segregation at Waterloo because the victims are not black, and the people who benefit from this discrimination are not white. For Amy there is only one group who can be racist.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 11, 2024 21:08:52 GMT
Just keep in mind that it is you that support segregation and racist policies that discriminate against people based on skin color. It is you that support the denial of a person's basic civil rights due to skin color. It is you that support two tier school policies based on skin color. You. And you're cool with ignoring decades, centuries, of the oppression of a people who had their civil rights, basic human liberties, freedom, and lives denied and stripped away from them. It's easier to sit on that righteous throne whining about how those same people are now wrecking your life (LOL) because of a scenario that's not remotely equivalent in moral scope. Funny how I don't notice anything in your post history that indicates you were worrying too much about those same civil liberties being denied systematically to non-whites over the years; nor anything that's expressing any moral indignation when those same civil liberties and equality under the law are being denied to those of different hue, religion, orientation or gender in the present day. It's only because you think White males are somehow getting the shaft (as if ) that's got your tear ducts and outrage glands working overtime now. Give it a rest. Your sort would be almost funny if it weren't for the fact that you're so embarrassingly ubiquitous in current American idiot-society. I've acknowledged and condemned bad things that happened in the past. I'll do it again; I condemn bad things that happened in the past. Now let's get back to the present. Racial segregation is bad, against the law, violates civil rights and goes against school policy. Given all that is it not wrong to have racial segregation in a university that otherwise condemns racism of any kind? If not, please explain why.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 10, 2024 19:55:41 GMT
The irony goes right over your head. You'd fit right in at stormfront as they also support racial segregation. Denying people their civil rights and racist policies you have that in common with them. Like them you crap all over all those who fought against segregation. Deplorable. Back comes the jack-in-the-box. The great White Male Supremacy Narrative is challenged, so any laughably transparent hypocrisy can be touted out in defense of it. You crap all over those who endured--and fought--decades of brutal oppression by those same White males, and think the 'turnabout is fair play' line puts you in the righteous seat. That same shit thinking appears all over Stormfront and related White Is Right sites all over the net 24/7, so it's not hard to see where you've picked up your script from. You're not deplorable. Just indoctrinated, dumb, and pitiful. The day you can see beyond the end of your own White nose will be a terrible one for you. Just keep in mind that it is you that support segregation and racist policies that discriminate against people based on skin color. It is you that support the denial of a person's basic civil rights due to skin color. It is you that support two tier school policies based on skin color. You.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 10, 2024 3:11:45 GMT
I might as well ask what your feelings are about the amount of black on white crime compared to white on black. the discussion is about the policy of segregation. We all know it's wrong and against the law. It's against school policy. Yet there it is. You really think it should be allowable because brutality against blacks at some point in history? Every group has faced brutality. You would see outrage barbeque if there was a white only swim class, or someone expressed that they don't want to be around blacks. Answer a question with a question. Anything to get around the (pardon the pun) black and white fact that you think it's far worse for you, as a white male, to feel even slightly put upon by the existence of an all-black enclave than the historical reality of centuries of oppression. Go back to Stormfront. There's no hope for you anywhere else. The irony goes right over your head. You'd fit right in at stormfront as they also support racial segregation. Denying people their civil rights and racist policies you have that in common with them. Like them you crap all over all those who fought against segregation. Deplorable.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 9, 2024 20:40:30 GMT
It is a fact. In 1954 if there was pool that didn't allow black people then that is racial discrimination and segregation. In 2024 if you're white and go for a swim and told it's for blacks only then that is also racial discrimination and segregation. In 2024 it's actually worse because we're supposed to know better and should have learned from past wrongs and also now it's against the law and in the case of Waterloo university it goes against their own policy of inclusion. How can a segregated class at a university be ok in 2024? We know that a chess club that doesn't have enough diversity and despite having no rules banning anyone based on race it still considered problematic and steps need to be taken. But blacks only? No problem. Nothing to see. Total racist hypocrisy. And what's your feeling about centuries of brutal oppression of Blacks by Whites? I'm getting the distinct feeling you're none too bothered by that (after all, you weren't around, right?), and sure as hell it's just nothing at all compared to the outrage barbecue you're having to endure at the realization that maybe Black folks don't want you around sometimes. Give it a rest. Your lame excuse for how one is not only equivalent to but actually worse than the other just gets lamer with every repeat performance of it. I might as well ask what your feelings are about the amount of black on white crime compared to white on black. the discussion is about the policy of segregation. We all know it's wrong and against the law. It's against school policy. Yet there it is. You really think it should be allowable because brutality against blacks at some point in history? Every group has faced brutality. You would see outrage barbeque if there was a white only swim class, or someone expressed that they don't want to be around blacks.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 6, 2024 21:37:08 GMT
The policy in itself of racial segregation is evil and racist. Doesn't matter in 1954 or 2024. Doesn't matter about violence. The policy of racial segregation is wrong, against the law and school policy. it's a social taboo. So yeah, there is no difference in regard to segregation be it in 1954 Alabama or a Canadian University in 2024. Do you condemn the illegal practice of racial segregation at Waterloo University? You're not alone in turning a blind eye to racism as it seems the University administration, faculty and student body are looking the other way or even support the illegal practice of racial segregation. So much for their policy of diversity and inclusion. This is the kind of "racism' that causes outrage and calls for action and has the school and fraternity having to issue statements. A student wearing a black mask to a goth party. baylorlariat.com/2024/02/01/sorority-faces-backlash-for-member-in-blackface-mask/ As I said before, you're not going to let go of the false equivalency narrative, because it's the only one you've got. The problem is, that at base, it's not a legitimate narrative and no amount of "you're turning a blind eye to racism" or "you support racism" does anything toward legitimizing it. It is a fact. In 1954 if there was pool that didn't allow black people then that is racial discrimination and segregation. In 2024 if you're white and go for a swim and told it's for blacks only then that is also racial discrimination and segregation. In 2024 it's actually worse because we're supposed to know better and should have learned from past wrongs and also now it's against the law and in the case of Waterloo university it goes against their own policy of inclusion. How can a segregated class at a university be ok in 2024? We know that a chess club that doesn't have enough diversity and despite having no rules banning anyone based on race it still considered problematic and steps need to be taken. But blacks only? No problem. Nothing to see. Total racist hypocrisy.
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 6, 2024 17:16:32 GMT
MAN CITY v EVERTON A FULHAM v BOURNEMOUTH D LIVERPOOL v BURNLEY H LUTON v SHEFF UTD D TOTTENHAM v BRIGHTON H WOLVES v BRENTFORD H NOTTM FOREST v NEWCASTLE A WEST HAM v ARSENAL A ASTON VILLA v MAN UTD D CRYSTAL PALACE v CHELSEA A
|
|
|
Post by OffTheBoatPsycho on Feb 6, 2024 16:37:37 GMT
You're trying to equate racial violence in a different country or countries from decades ago to defend racial segregation in 2024. A segregated event in 2024 is wrong and against the law and against school policy. Why are you defending racial segregation? You're going to continue to beat that false equivalency narrative into the ground, because it's the only one you've got. When it fails to convince, you slip easily into the "you're defending (insert abomination of choice here)". Which is simply argument ad hominem, which is simply no argument at all. You have no counter-arguments beyond this; in Stormfront-land that's a workable tactic, I've no doubt. Outside of it you're going to have to do a little better than the ongoing spiel of 'decades of terroristic violence against a group/gee, they have an exclusionary swim team, that really annoys me' if you expect your arguments to be taken seriously. The policy in itself of racial segregation is evil and racist. Doesn't matter in 1954 or 2024. Doesn't matter about violence. The policy of racial segregation is wrong, against the law and school policy. it's a social taboo. So yeah, there is no difference in regard to segregation be it in 1954 Alabama or a Canadian University in 2024. Do you condemn the illegal practice of racial segregation at Waterloo University? You're not alone in turning a blind eye to racism as it seems the University administration, faculty and student body are looking the other way or even support the illegal practice of racial segregation. So much for their policy of diversity and inclusion. This is the kind of "racism' that causes outrage and calls for action and has the school and fraternity having to issue statements. A student wearing a black mask to a goth party. baylorlariat.com/2024/02/01/sorority-faces-backlash-for-member-in-blackface-mask/
|
|