|
Post by DC-Fan on May 8, 2019 22:34:27 GMT
And Hela held Thor's hammer in the 3rd Thor movie. So clearly someone doesn't have to high integrity to hold Thor's hammer since even a conqueror and executioner can hold Thor's hammer. She didn't hold it. She stopped it's momentum so it didn't hit her.
Look at it shaking. She's leaning into it and actually fighting it.
You probably have gotten to it in school yet, but there's this thing called gravity. SO the hammer would fall unless it was on top of something or someone is holding it up. Since there's clearly nothing under the hammer, the only thing holding up the hammer is Hela's hand. So she's clearly holding up the hammer. Thanks for proving once again that I'm 100% correct. So clearly it doesn't take someone with high integrity to hold up Thor's hammer since even a conqueror and executioner can hold up Thor's hammer.
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on May 8, 2019 22:53:15 GMT
She didn't hold it. She stopped it's momentum so it didn't hit her.
Look at it shaking. She's leaning into it and actually fighting it.
You probably have gotten to it in school yet, but there's this thing called gravity. SO the hammer would fall unless it was on top of something or someone is holding it up. Since there's clearly nothing under the hammer, the only thing holding up the hammer is Hela's hand. So she's clearly holding up the hammer. Thanks for proving once again that I'm 100% correct. So clearly it doesn't take someone with high integrity to hold up Thor's hammer since even a conqueror and executioner can hold up Thor's hammer. Is she also holding up the strap? Don't be such an obvious troll.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on May 8, 2019 22:57:54 GMT
She didn't hold it. She stopped it's momentum so it didn't hit her.
Look at it shaking. She's leaning into it and actually fighting it.
You probably have gotten to it in school yet, but there's this thing called gravity. SO the hammer would fall unless it was on top of something or someone is holding it up. Since there's clearly nothing under the hammer, the only thing holding up the hammer is Hela's hand. So she's clearly holding up the hammer. Thanks for proving once again that I'm 100% correct. So clearly it doesn't take someone with high integrity to hold up Thor's hammer since even a conqueror and executioner can hold up Thor's hammer. I was just lifting weights and had to take my gloves off for this.
What does gravity have to do with Thor throwing his hammer at Hela? When he throws the hammer it keeps going until he calls it back. There isn't an arc when he throws the hammer. It's a straight line unless he curves it in a circle. So since he threw the hammer at Hela, it was still going forward. If she didn't stop the forward momentum it would have looked like:
You see the strap on the handle of the hammer when he throws it at Hela? You see how it's erect? That means it's trying to move forward.
Also, you know nothing.
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on May 8, 2019 23:10:35 GMT
DC-Fan rocks. He manages to live rent free in the heads of every mcu fan on this site. They constantly attack and insult him and it's like water off a ducks back. Never change DC-Fan
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on May 9, 2019 11:40:59 GMT
DC-Fan rocks. He manages to live rent free in the heads of every mcu fan on this site. They constantly attack and insult him and it's like water off a ducks back. Never change DC-Fan Considering how much he gets owned, he's kinda like our pet.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on May 9, 2019 14:39:40 GMT
DC-Fan rocks. He manages to live rent free in the heads of every mcu fan on this site. They constantly attack and insult him and it's like water off a ducks back. Never change DC-Fan Considering how much he gets owned, he's kinda like our pet. All of our replies to him is like hitting a puppy with a rolled up newspaper. "NO!"
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on May 9, 2019 20:13:54 GMT
DC-Fan rocks. He manages to live rent free in the heads of every mcu fan on this site. They constantly attack and insult him and it's like water off a ducks back. Never change DC-Fan Stroking his ego may not be so good for him the long haul, just saying.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on May 9, 2019 20:33:55 GMT
DC-Fan rocks. He manages to live rent free in the heads of every mcu fan on this site. They constantly attack and insult him and it's like water off a ducks back. Never change DC-Fan Stroking his ego may not be so good for him the long haul, just saying.
|
|
|
Post by seahawksraawk00 on May 9, 2019 21:40:03 GMT
There are superheroes who have super-powers due to being demi-gods or due to having alien physiology. Examples are Wonder Woman, Thor, Superman, Martian Manhunter. There are superheroes who have super-powers due to natural mutation. Examples are the X-Men. And there are superheroes who have super-powers due to an accident. Examples are the Flash, Hulk, and Fantastic Four. Then there's Steve Rogers, who has super-powers not due to natural mutation or an accident but because he was power-hungry and jealous of others and wanted to gain super-powers. Like Syndrome in The Incredibles and Dr. Sivana in Shazam!, Steve Rogers was a reject who was power-hungry and jealous of others and thus wanted to gain super-powers. And like Syndrome in The Incredibles and Dr. Sivana in Shazam!, when Steve Rogers got his super-powers, he decided that he wanted to always be in charge and would do whatever he wanted to do and didn't give a shit about the lesser people who weren't as powerful as he was. When Bucky was arrested, Steve Rogers had the chance to be a true hero and show the people that no matter how much super-powers he has, he wouldn't be a tyrant and would still be willing to answer to the people (like Superman does). He had a chance to show the people that he believed in the justice system and believed that a jury made up of the people would make the right and just decision with regards to whether or not Bucky was guilty. But instead, Steve Rogers basically said to the people "I don't believe in YOUR justice system and I don't believe in YOU to make the right and just decision because YOU are lesser and unworthy so since I'm more powerful than YOU, I will be the sole judge and jury and I will unilaterally decide that Bucky is not guilty and won't have to go on trial the way that any other defendant without super-powers would have to". Steve Rogers was nothing but a reject who was power-hungry and jealous of others so he actively sought to gain super-powers and after he gained his super-powers, he became a tyrant who refused to answer to the people and decided that he would be in charge and unilaterally decide innocence or guilt, like a tyrant does. Hold up. After going on an unsanctioned mission to rescue Bucky in the First Avengers, he volunteered to put into custody for disobeying orders, but Tommy Lee Jones refused to do that.
|
|
|
Post by RedDeadFallout on May 9, 2019 22:16:17 GMT
There are superheroes who have super-powers due to being demi-gods or due to having alien physiology. Examples are Wonder Woman, Thor, Superman, Martian Manhunter. There are superheroes who have super-powers due to natural mutation. Examples are the X-Men. And there are superheroes who have super-powers due to an accident. Examples are the Flash, Hulk, and Fantastic Four. Then there's Steve Rogers, who has super-powers not due to natural mutation or an accident but because he was power-hungry and jealous of others and wanted to gain super-powers. Like Syndrome in The Incredibles and Dr. Sivana in Shazam!, Steve Rogers was a reject who was power-hungry and jealous of others and thus wanted to gain super-powers. And like Syndrome in The Incredibles and Dr. Sivana in Shazam!, when Steve Rogers got his super-powers, he decided that he wanted to always be in charge and would do whatever he wanted to do and didn't give a shit about the lesser people who weren't as powerful as he was. When Bucky was arrested, Steve Rogers had the chance to be a true hero and show the people that no matter how much super-powers he has, he wouldn't be a tyrant and would still be willing to answer to the people (like Superman does). He had a chance to show the people that he believed in the justice system and believed that a jury made up of the people would make the right and just decision with regards to whether or not Bucky was guilty. But instead, Steve Rogers basically said to the people "I don't believe in YOUR justice system and I don't believe in YOU to make the right and just decision because YOU are lesser and unworthy so since I'm more powerful than YOU, I will be the sole judge and jury and I will unilaterally decide that Bucky is not guilty and won't have to go on trial the way that any other defendant without super-powers would have to". Steve Rogers was nothing but a reject who was power-hungry and jealous of others so he actively sought to gain super-powers and after he gained his super-powers, he became a tyrant who refused to answer to the people and decided that he would be in charge and unilaterally decide innocence or guilt, like a tyrant does. He's not really, he's actually fictional.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on May 13, 2019 3:53:56 GMT
Yet at the end of Endgame he goes to Vormir and willingly hands over the powerful Soul Stone to the Red Skull, who was a former leader of HYDRA. Liar. Red Skull specifically mentions he can't possess the stone. And we only have Red Skull's word for that. So Cap claims that the UN can't be trusted to have oversight over the Avengers because the UN is corrupt and infiltrated by HYDRA (even though there was no evidence presented at all that anyone in the UN was corrupt or associated in any way with HYDRA), yet Cap is willing to trust the word of the former leader of HYDRA that he can't possess the Soul Stone and just hand over the powerful Soul Stone to the former leader of HYDRA?Like I said, the writing in MCU movies is just inconsistent and lazy and awful.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on May 13, 2019 4:57:29 GMT
Question: scabab Hauntedknight87, how many times can the same idea be posted on this board before we consider it repetitive SPAM? Seems to me that the same person has posted this argument multiple times as either a new thread or in response to someone else’s thread. I think that, by now, we all understand that DC-Fan is pro-government and against individual thinking of any kind. We respect his views but, must we be subject to them over and over and over again? Just asking...
|
|
|
Post by scabab on May 13, 2019 6:13:53 GMT
Yeah at this point, I don't know why he just doesn't bump one of the older threads. At least update it with one of his atrocities from Endgame or something.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on May 13, 2019 8:04:46 GMT
Question: scabab Hauntedknight87 , how many times can the same idea be posted on this board before we consider it repetitive SPAM? Seems to me that the same person has posted this argument multiple times as either a new thread or in response to someone else’s thread. I think that, by now, we all understand that DC-Fan is pro-government and against individual thinking of any kind. We respect his views but, must we be subject to them over and over and over again? Just asking... Speak for yourself, I respect he is entitled to his own opinion, I however have yet to find evidence that he is capable of forming his own given he tends to simply steal those of other peoples, but just because I respect his right to have his own opinion, it does not mean I respect that opinion itself, especially when said opinions are based on utter bollocks and lies...just saying, you are being a tad to kind towards our resident pillock.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on May 13, 2019 9:50:06 GMT
Liar. Red Skull specifically mentions he can't possess the stone. And we only have Red Skull's word for that. So Cap claims that the UN can't be trusted to have oversight over the Avengers because the UN is corrupt and infiltrated by HYDRA (even though there was no evidence presented at all that anyone in the UN was corrupt or associated in any way with HYDRA), yet Cap is willing to trust the word of the former leader of HYDRA that he can't possess the Soul Stone and just hand over the powerful Soul Stone to the former leader of HYDRA?Like I said, the writing in MCU movies is just inconsistent and lazy and awful. It's a pretty safe bet that the entity formally known as Red Skull couldn't possess the stone ... because he didn't ... the entire time he was on Vormir. A "power-hungry tyrant" would have keep the stones for himself. Steve Rogers returned them all and settled for a quiet life. How many endless hours have you wasted trying to argue that Captain America was a power-hungry tyrant? ... only to be completely squashed by the events in End Game. Too funny! Do you ever tire of being wrong?
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on May 13, 2019 11:34:48 GMT
Question: scabab Hauntedknight87 , how many times can the same idea be posted on this board before we consider it repetitive SPAM? Seems to me that the same person has posted this argument multiple times as either a new thread or in response to someone else’s thread. I think that, by now, we all understand that DC-Fan is pro-government and against individual thinking of any kind. We respect his views but, must we be subject to them over and over and over again? Just asking... Speak for yourself, I respect he is entitled to his own opinion, I however have yet to find evidence that he is capable of forming his own given he tends to simply steal those of other peoples, but just because I respect his right to have his own opinion, it does not mean I respect that opinion itself, especially when said opinions are based on utter bollocks and lies...just saying, you are being a tad to kind towards our resident pillock. My goal is to get the mods to recognize that the repetitious posting of the same content over and over again is equivalent to posting SPAM on the board. DC fan has been posting this same set of ideas -- verbatim -- since as far back as the release of Civil War. We've literally been seeing nearly identical posts from him since mid-2016. If these posts said something to the effect of "How to watch movies online for free — legally," we'd all agree that was SPAM. I think the number of times we can post the same exact thing over and over again should be limited. This post doesn't invite discussion so much as it serves as a form of advertising and propaganda. I agree with scabab in that an old thread should be resurrected instead of any new threads being created. Unless of course everyone just enjoys having the near exact same discussion year after year. That's totally cool but, it feels a tad remedial to me.
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on May 13, 2019 13:06:18 GMT
Liar. Red Skull specifically mentions he can't possess the stone. And we only have Red Skull's word for that. So Cap claims that the UN can't be trusted to have oversight over the Avengers because the UN is corrupt and infiltrated by HYDRA (even though there was no evidence presented at all that anyone in the UN was corrupt or associated in any way with HYDRA), yet Cap is willing to trust the word of the former leader of HYDRA that he can't possess the Soul Stone and just hand over the powerful Soul Stone to the former leader of HYDRA?Like I said, the writing in MCU movies is just inconsistent and lazy and awful. Liar. We also specifically see that the Red Skull doesn't possess the stone. Twice we see him without it even though he's right there.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on May 14, 2019 20:43:12 GMT
we all understand that DC-Fan is pro-government It's not "pro-government". It's pro-democracy and pro-freedom. In a free and democratic society, everyone (even POTUS) is accountable to the people. But Steve Rogers doesn't want the Avengers to be accountable to the people because he thinks that since the Avengers are more powerful than the people, the Avengers should rule over the people instead of being judged by the people. Rogers doesn't want Bucky to have a trial and be judged by the people because Rogers opposes democracy and freedom and wants to be a tyrant.
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on May 14, 2019 21:44:01 GMT
we all understand that DC-Fan is pro-government It's not "pro-government". It's pro-democracy and pro-freedom. In a free and democratic society, everyone (even POTUS) is accountable to the people. But Steve Rogers doesn't want the Avengers to be accountable to the people because he thinks that since the Avengers are more powerful than the people, the Avengers should rule over the people instead of being judged by the people. Rogers doesn't want Bucky to have a trial and be judged by the people because Rogers opposes democracy and freedom and wants to be a tyrant. But in democracy, you have choice. If the Avengers signed the Accords, they lose their right to choose. Something you don't know. Also, if Steve wanted to rule over the people, why doesn't he just do it? Last I checked, the USA in the MCU still has a president.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on May 14, 2019 23:49:43 GMT
we all understand that DC-Fan is pro-government It's not "pro-government". It's pro-democracy and pro-freedom. In a free and democratic society, everyone (even POTUS) is accountable to the people. But Steve Rogers doesn't want the Avengers to be accountable to the people because he thinks that since the Avengers are more powerful than the people, the Avengers should rule over the people instead of being judged by the people. Rogers doesn't want Bucky to have a trial and be judged by the people because Rogers opposes democracy and freedom and wants to be a tyrant. Nah, I think you're pro-government and, probably pro-big government, too. You're against civil disobedience (even though that's what the US was founded on) and you have collectivist leanings. You're just short of being a communist and, that's fine. I would never trample on another man's belief system because, I believe that you, as an individual, has the right to be self-actualized instead of stampeded and railroaded by mob rule.
|
|