|
|
Post by damngumby on Jun 3, 2019 23:53:28 GMT
|
|
agentblue
Sophomore
@agentblue
Posts: 792
Likes: 248
 
|
Post by agentblue on Jun 4, 2019 0:22:54 GMT
It looks like there will be two separate continuities. So you foresee the Robert Pattinson franchise, and a separate older current day Batman (say Jon Hamm?) that only appears in Justice League/team up movies? Is that what you mean?
Personally, I could live with that. Its the other fans that get crazy. "I'm confused!!!"
That would be cool but it looks like they are doing the multiverse thing. I wish it was all the same universe tho.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 4, 2019 0:28:48 GMT
So people did see Wonder Woman being heroic in 1984. And that is not long enough for people to forget about metahumans and be surprised by Superman. Well, 1984 was before everyone had cell phones so there wouldn't have been videos posted on the Internet. So for people who weren't there to see Wonder Woman in person (which would be most of the world), they probably think the stories are an urban myth. It would be like the stories of the alien crash in Roswell in 1947. Some people who were there in Roswell know what really happened, but for people who weren't there in Roswell to see it in person (which was most of the world), those are just unconfirmed stories and rumors. Also, MoS Kal-El wouldn't have arrived on Earth until after 1984.
|
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Jun 4, 2019 0:33:51 GMT
So people did see Wonder Woman being heroic in 1984. And that is not long enough for people to forget about metahumans and be surprised by Superman. Also, MoS Kal-El wouldn't have arrived on Earth until after 1984. Well, actually, according to MoS, Clark had been living on Earth for 33 years. Assuming MoS takes place in 2013, that would mean that he definitely landed on Earth before 1984.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jun 4, 2019 12:53:51 GMT
I'm thinking they are sorta rebooting the DCEU into a multiverse. Wonder Woman 84 might be a sequel to Wonder Woman, but it isn't a part of the Snyder trilogy. In the Snyder trilogy she went away after Wonder Woman. Nobody knew about her outside of the people in World War 1. But in WW84, they show her operating in the open. So people did see Wonder Woman being heroic in 1984. And that is not long enough for people to forget about metahumans and be surprised by Superman. Oh boy, it’s Fox-men all over again. |
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Jun 4, 2019 16:10:17 GMT
Also, MoS Kal-El wouldn't have arrived on Earth until after 1984. Well, actually, according to MoS, Clark had been living on Earth for 33 years. Assuming MoS takes place in 2013, that would mean that he definitely landed on Earth before 1984. Incorrect, though I think you may have accidentally stumbled onto a spoiler of some kind. Clark was 33 years old in 2013, if he was say 3 or so when he landed ( like he was in the 78 film ) that would mean he had been living on Earth for about 30 years, and had landed around 1983. Since Patty Jenkins claims there is a very specific reason the film is set when it is, it's possible that they will show the landing in the new film and/or have WW witness it.
|
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Jun 4, 2019 16:16:02 GMT
Well, actually, according to MoS, Clark had been living on Earth for 33 years. Assuming MoS takes place in 2013, that would mean that he definitely landed on Earth before 1984. Incorrect, though I think you may have accidentally stumbled onto a spoiler of some kind. Clark was 33 years old in 2013, if he was say 3 or so when he landed ( like he was in the 78 film ) that would mean he had been living on Earth for about 30 years, and had landed around 1983. Since Patty Jenkins claims there is a very specific reason the film is set when it is, it's possible that they will show the landing in the new film and/or have WW witness it. He specifically said that he’s “been here for 33 years” in MoS.
|
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Jun 4, 2019 16:22:28 GMT
Incorrect, though I think you may have accidentally stumbled onto a spoiler of some kind. Clark was 33 years old in 2013, if he was say 3 or so when he landed ( like he was in the 78 film ) that would mean he had been living on Earth for about 30 years, and had landed around 1983. Since Patty Jenkins claims there is a very specific reason the film is set when it is, it's possible that they will show the landing in the new film and/or have WW witness it. He specifically said that he’s “been here for 33 years” in MoS. Oh, I did not remember that. I only saw MoS one time!
|
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Jun 4, 2019 17:21:31 GMT
Well, actually, according to MoS, Clark had been living on Earth for 33 years. Assuming MoS takes place in 2013, that would mean that he definitely landed on Earth before 1984. Incorrect, though I think you may have accidentally stumbled onto a spoiler of some kind. Clark was 33 years old in 2013, if he was say 3 or so when he landed ( like he was in the 78 film ) that would mean he had been living on Earth for about 30 years, and had landed around 1983. Since Patty Jenkins claims there is a very specific reason the film is set when it is, it's possible that they will show the landing in the new film and/or have WW witness it. I think Kal El's trip to Earth was an almost instant warp. Since they can open gates. They showed his birth at the beginning of the movie.
|
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Jun 4, 2019 17:35:45 GMT
So people did see Wonder Woman being heroic in 1984. And that is not long enough for people to forget about metahumans and be surprised by Superman. Well, 1984 was before everyone had cell phones so there wouldn't have been videos posted on the Internet. So for people who weren't there to see Wonder Woman in person (which would be most of the world), they probably think the stories are an urban myth. It would be like the stories of the alien crash in Roswell in 1947. Some people who were there in Roswell know what really happened, but for people who weren't there in Roswell to see it in person (which was most of the world), those are just unconfirmed stories and rumors. Also, MoS Kal-El wouldn't have arrived on Earth until after 1984. But the movie takes place in Washington, D.C. Tourists are all over the place. People did have video cameras back then. People videotaped things and sent it to the news. Hell, field reporters would be all over D.C. Especially government buildings.
Yes, but people were surprised about the super man in 2013. If there was a woman doing the same things that Superman can do back in 1984, they wouldn't immediately think that he was a threat. They'd want to know if he was connected to her. I mean, they both are wearing blue, red and yellow with very similar power set. And they both have very similar looks. They might even think that she was his mother and that's why she went away after 1984.
|
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Jun 4, 2019 19:05:32 GMT
So you foresee the Robert Pattinson franchise, and a separate older current day Batman (say Jon Hamm?) that only appears in Justice League/team up movies? Is that what you mean?
Personally, I could live with that. Its the other fans that get crazy. "I'm confused!!!"
I wouldn’t count on there being another Justice League movie anytime within the next decade. Unfortunately, you might be right.
Unless... Unless, they have some director come in who creates a monster hit for them! And then maybe they'll let him/her spearhead it. Kinda like MCU did with the Russo Brothers.
DCEU needs a Russo Brothers!
|
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Jun 4, 2019 19:56:12 GMT
I thought I heard something about that a while back. Surprised nobody else in the thread had, I'm not even a fan of the DCEU. Nothing about the stupidity of DC Fan surprises me, however.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 4, 2019 20:25:13 GMT
I wouldn’t count on there being another Justice League movie anytime within the next decade. Unfortunately, you might be right.
Unless... Unless, they have some director come in who creates a monster hit for them!
Like James Wan?
|
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Jun 4, 2019 21:48:48 GMT
Unfortunately, you might be right.
Unless... Unless, they have some director come in who creates a monster hit for them!
Like James Wan? I wish. But I think his heart is in horror, and that's where he'll return, aside from maybe Aquaman sequels.
|
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Jun 4, 2019 22:12:00 GMT
Shazam! is the new face of the DCEU.
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Jun 4, 2019 23:53:05 GMT
Unfortunately, you might be right.
Unless... Unless, they have some director come in who creates a monster hit for them!
Like James Wan? No, like he said, like the Russo brothers. James Wan did an adequate job with Aquaman ... but in the end, he couldn't even beat Captain Marvel. An obscure superhero that most of the movie going public never even heard of. I guess that's a win if you have already accepted the fact that you can never really compete with the MCU.
|
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Jun 5, 2019 0:13:03 GMT
No, like he said, like the Russo brothers. James Wan did an adequate job with Aquaman ... but in the end, he couldn't even beat Captain Marvel. An obscure superhero that most of the movie going public never even heard of. I guess that's a win if you have already accepted the fact that you can never really compete with the MCU. Didn’t Aquaman make more money than Captain Marvel worldwide? |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 5, 2019 0:54:04 GMT
No, like he said, like the Russo brothers. James Wan did an adequate job with Aquaman ... but in the end, he couldn't even beat Captain Marvel. An obscure superhero that most of the movie going public never even heard of. I guess that's a win if you have already accepted the fact that you can never really compete with the MCU. Didn’t Aquaman make more money than Captain Marvel worldwide? Yes, Aquaman beat Captain Marvel by $20 million. damngumby just got owned!
|
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Jun 5, 2019 1:22:13 GMT
Didn’t Aquaman make more money than Captain Marvel worldwide? Yes, Aquaman beat Captain Marvel by $20 million. damngumby just got owned! And? Captain Marvel was still a huge success. |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 5, 2019 1:30:53 GMT
Yes, Aquaman beat Captain Marvel by $20 million. damngumby just got owned! And? Captain Marvel was still a huge success. Not as much as Aquaman.
|
|
