|
Post by goz on Dec 28, 2020 21:33:38 GMT
The majority of the human race has believed in a higher power going all the way back to the origins of recorded human history. Extreme hostility can’t change this history and it can’t change what the majority of human beings believe today. No one can prove that these billions and billions of people have been wrong to believe in a higher power for all these thiusands of years. Ramping up the hostility about this changes nothing. It is not hostility, it is stating facts, logic, reason and science.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Dec 28, 2020 21:35:32 GMT
The anti-religion religion is almost as passionate as any major or minor religion. You devote yourselves to it although only a small handful of people call you on it. Very strange. Atheists and others who either lack belief or don't bother with one because they are unsure, can never be classifies as an anti-religion. It is an oxymoron.
|
|
|
Post by SciFive on Dec 28, 2020 21:36:37 GMT
The majority of the human race has believed in a higher power going all the way back to the origins of recorded human history. Extreme hostility can’t change this history and it can’t change what the majority of human beings believe today. No one can prove that these billions and billions of people have been wrong to believe in a higher power for all these thiusands of years. Ramping up the hostility about this changes nothing. It is not hostility, it is stating facts, logic, reason and science. No, it’s hostility. The funny thing is that you guys attack the human race without expecting the human race will fight back somehow.
|
|
|
Post by SciFive on Dec 28, 2020 21:38:24 GMT
The anti-religion religion is almost as passionate as any major or minor religion. You devote yourselves to it although only a small handful of people call you on it. Very strange. Atheists and others who either lack belief or don't bother with one becasue they are unsure, can never be classifies as an anti-religion. It is an oxymoron. Atheism is usually pretty neutral. I’m talking about the people who devote their lives to attacking believers like vicious dogs.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Dec 28, 2020 21:43:24 GMT
It is not hostility, it is stating facts, logic, reason and science. No, it’s hostility. The funny thing is that you guys attack the human race without expecting the human race will fight back somehow. Huh? How can facts logic reason and science presentation be hostile ? IF you percive that as hostile, then that says more about you and your insecurities about religion than than the facts being presented. Think of it as how you carry on about 'Just presenting the facts of Judaism' ad nauseam'. Same thing.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Dec 28, 2020 21:44:43 GMT
Atheists and others who either lack belief or don't bother with one becasue they are unsure, can never be classifies as an anti-religion. It is an oxymoron. Atheism is usually pretty neutral. I’m talking about the people who devote their lives to attacking believers like vicious dogs. Yep. Athesism is pretty neutral. I don't know any of them. You must be very unlucky to know such people. Perhaps it is your perception of what they are saying?
|
|
|
Post by SciFive on Dec 28, 2020 21:46:21 GMT
No, it’s hostility. The funny thing is that you guys attack the human race without expecting the human race will fight back somehow. Huh? You can’t prove that a higher power doesn’t exist.
|
|
|
Post by SciFive on Dec 28, 2020 21:47:28 GMT
Atheism is usually pretty neutral. I’m talking about the people who devote their lives to attacking believers like vicious dogs. Yep. Athesism is pretty neutral. I don't know any of them. You must be very unlucky to know such people. Perhaps it is your perception of what they are saying? I know some atheists. They don’t attack believers. They just don’t believe.
|
|
|
Post by Feologild Oakes on Dec 28, 2020 21:50:12 GMT
No, it’s hostility. The funny thing is that you guys attack the human race without expecting the human race will fight back somehow. Huh? How can facts logic reason and science presentation be hostile ? IF you percive that as hostile, then that says more about you and your insecurities about religion than than the facts being presented. Think of it as how you carry on about 'Just presenting the facts of Judaism' ad nauseam'. Same thing. You know what many religious people are like, they think all criticism of their religion is a hostile attack on there faith and religion.
|
|
|
Post by SciFive on Dec 28, 2020 21:52:01 GMT
Huh? How can facts logic reason and science presentation be hostile ? IF you percive that as hostile, then that says more about you and your insecurities about religion than than the facts being presented. Think of it as how you carry on about 'Just presenting the facts of Judaism' ad nauseam'. Same thing. You know what many religious people are like, they think all criticism of their religion is a hostile attack on there faith. You mean “criticism” like saying that every believer is a danger to himself and to others? That’s a smear.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Dec 28, 2020 21:55:24 GMT
Yep. Athesism is pretty neutral. I don't know any of them. You must be very unlucky to know such people. Perhaps it is your perception of what they are saying? I know some atheists. They don’t attack believers. They just don’t believe. Yeah me too.
|
|