|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 5, 2017 20:14:47 GMT
So, in other words, DC had to copy Marvel in order to make a good movie. According to DC Fan they had to copy a coiuple of old Superman films! No, I didn't say they copied old Superman films. I said they paid homage to Superman and Superman II, the 2 movies that started the CBM genre.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 5, 2017 21:50:07 GMT
Oh critics are right now? I guess BVS and SS were shit after all then. It's weird how that matters sometimes and other times it doesn't. Also, how much of a boost do you think the "first good DC film", "female led comic" film give it? Surely you'd admit there's a bit of eagerness to call it good. Look how desperate it got for SS.
Anyway, I can't name anything particularly better about it though. Can you?
Triggered. Just was giving you a last chance to be taken seriously.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2017 7:42:25 GMT
It has already taken the title of 'Biggest Selling and Most Successful Female Superhero Movie of All Time.' I don't see Marvel being able to compete with DC with female superhero movies going forward especially when they wouldn't even make a 'Black Widow' movie and the majority of the biggest selling female lead comic book series are by DC, Image Comics/Top Crow (Witchblade has outsold every Marvel female lead series), Event Comics, Dynamite Entertainment etc. Marvel will be lucky if they can compete with 'Painkiller Jane', 'Avengelyne', 'Witchblade' and 'The Pro' with female lead movies going forward 'cause they simply lack the female superheroes to be successful in that field. Well I'm not really worried about who wins that competition to be honest, and I don't think competing in female superhero movies is going to be a large category. Also they didn't make a Black Widow film for a reason. It didn't advance the overarching plan. Black Widow isn't a main character in Marvel and WW kinda is. Also, I'm pretty sure Captain Marvel will do alright, Wasp is coming as a title character, and they always have characters like She-Hulk, Spiderwoman, Scarlet Witch, Spider Qwen, and perhaps even characters like Moondragon and Quasar (Phyla Vell) they could give a run at. I don't think DC is coming out with anything other than WW, so I don't know what the category of female superhero movies really even means other than WW and Captain Marvel at this point, or why you think Marvel couldn't compete with them if they wanted to. There isn't going to be some arms race for female centric movies if that's what you think.
Batgirl – Confirmed
Gotham City Sirens – Confirmed Wonder Woman 2 – Very close to being confirmed (if not confirmed already) Painkiller Jane – Confirmed with Jessica Chastain as Jane Avageleyne – Confirmed Witchblade – Movie and TV series confirmed by Marc Silvestro (the creator of Witchblade and head of Top Cow Productions). Zatanna in Justice League Dark – Confirmed (could lead to Zatanna, Constantine and Swamp Thing solo movies) Warner Bros looking to make more female superhero movies after success of Wonder Woman – CONFIRMED (Supergirl and Birds of Prey rumoured to be front runners with talk of Starfire, Raven, Batwoman, Black Canary, Zatanna being names under strong consideration)
More Bat Family members to appear in the DCU apart from Batgirl and Nightwing – Confirmed by Warner Bros. The Spoiler, Orphan, Red Robin and Batwoman are most likely front runners. The Pro – Confirmed Silver & Black – Confirmed (Spider Woman heavily rumoured to debut in movie) The Monolith – Confirmed (Daisy Ridley rumoured to play Alice) Image Comics/Top Crow Productions looking to launch joint movie universe with Event Comics and Dynamite Entertainment based on the success of Spawn and Painkiller Jane – Confirmed Who are the majority of the biggest selling comic book series under those companies? Female lead series like Witchblade, Painkiller Jane, Aphrodite IX, The Magdalena, Red Sonja, Vampirella, Darkchylde, Swords of Sorrow etc.
As many articles have pointed out, there are currently more female lead comic book movies in development now than ever before and with the success of the Wonder Woman movie the era of female superheroes is here. Many studios outside of Warner Bros are now looking to make more movies based on female lead comic book series and there is a LARGE amount of female comic book series (many which have outsold male lead comic book series that have movies) that have never been given the same chance to shine on screen due to the sexism of the industry until now. If Marvel want to stay in the competition they are going to have to start using more female superheroes instead of giving movies to lesser known male superheroes based on their genders.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 7, 2017 11:51:48 GMT
Well I'm not really worried about who wins that competition to be honest, and I don't think competing in female superhero movies is going to be a large category. Also they didn't make a Black Widow film for a reason. It didn't advance the overarching plan. Black Widow isn't a main character in Marvel and WW kinda is. Also, I'm pretty sure Captain Marvel will do alright, Wasp is coming as a title character, and they always have characters like She-Hulk, Spiderwoman, Scarlet Witch, Spider Qwen, and perhaps even characters like Moondragon and Quasar (Phyla Vell) they could give a run at. I don't think DC is coming out with anything other than WW, so I don't know what the category of female superhero movies really even means other than WW and Captain Marvel at this point, or why you think Marvel couldn't compete with them if they wanted to. There isn't going to be some arms race for female centric movies if that's what you think.
Batgirl – Confirmed
Gotham City Sirens – Confirmed Wonder Woman 2 – Very close to being confirmed (if not confirmed already) Painkiller Jane – Confirmed with Jessica Chastain as Jane Avageleyne – Confirmed Witchblade – Movie and TV series confirmed by Marc Silvestro (the creator of Witchblade and head of Top Cow Productions). Zatanna in Justice League Dark – Confirmed (could lead to Zatanna, Constantine and Swamp Thing solo movies) Warner Bros looking to make more female superhero movies after success of Wonder Woman – CONFIRMED (Supergirl and Birds of Prey rumoured to be front runners with talk of Starfire, Raven, Batwoman, Black Canary, Zatanna being names under strong consideration)
More Bat Family members to appear in the DCU apart from Batgirl and Nightwing – Confirmed by Warner Bros. The Spoiler, Orphan, Red Robin and Batwoman are most likely front runners. The Pro – Confirmed Silver & Black – Confirmed (Spider Woman heavily rumoured to debut in movie) The Monolith – Confirmed (Daisy Ridley rumoured to play Alice) Image Comics/Top Crow Productions looking to launch joint movie universe with Event Comics and Dynamite Entertainment based on the success of Spawn and Painkiller Jane – Confirmed Who are the majority of the biggest selling comic book series under those companies? Female lead series like Witchblade, Painkiller Jane, Aphrodite IX, The Magdalena, Red Sonja, Vampirella, Darkchylde, Swords of Sorrow etc.
As many articles have pointed out, there are currently more female lead comic book movies in development now than ever before and with the success of the Wonder Woman movie the era of female superheroes is here. Many studios outside of Warner Bros are now looking to make more movies based on female lead comic book series and there is a LARGE amount of female comic book series (many which have outsold male lead comic book series that have movies) that have never been given the same chance to shine on screen due to the sexism of the industry until now. If Marvel want to stay in the competition they are going to have to start using more female superheroes instead of giving movies to lesser known male superheroes based on their genders.
Yeah and I literally don't want to see any of those.
I don't know how you came to the conclusion that staying in competition requires using female superheroes either. Marvel is leading the competition if you haven't noticed. By a lot.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2017 7:01:46 GMT
Yeah and I literally don't want to see any of those.
I don't know how you came to the conclusion that staying in competition requires using female superheroes either.
Well, that is your opinion but a lot of us female superhero fans have been waiting for DECADES to see our favourite characters on screen over 100 movies of the same male superheroes played out again and again but Hollywood never gave us that opportunity until now regardless of many female characters having much higher comic book sales than male superheroes that get their own movies and sequels. Let's not forget 'Witchblade' is one of the biggest selling comic book series of all time with higher sales than not only all of Marvel's female superhero series but Iron Man, Thor, Ant Man, Black Panther, Doctor Strange, Deadpool, Guardians of the Galaxy etc and unlike most of them this wasn't a series that started in the Golden Age or Silver Age of comics. It started in the 90s around the time Marvel was going bankrupt and outsold many of Marvel and DC's biggest selling superheroes in 20 years. A 'Witchblade' movie could go on to do the exact same thing it did in comic books in the late 90s and early 00s 'cause it presents something completely different from the same superhero formula that Marvel has played out on screen for over the past decade and something completely different than we have ever seen in movies before.
You say Marvel is leading the competition but name one female superhero by Marvel that has been as successful as Wonder Woman? With 'Batgirl' set to come out in 2019 now Marvel with have two movies to compete with when they release 'Captain Marvel' (that is if it isn't pushed back to 2020 or 2022) and 'Batgirl' could slaughter 'Captain Marvel' too with it being directed by the creator of 'Buffy the Vampire Slayer and being based on one of the biggest selling female superhero comic book series of all time by Gail Simone. And with more female lead comic book movies in development it is a competition just like it is with the male superheroes and one DC is most likely to dominate in.Yet the two biggest selling superheroes of all time are STILL Batman and Superman, Marvel haven't had a TV show as successful as Batman, Wonder Woman or Lois and Clark: The New Adventures of Superman and the Arkham series dominates all of Marvel's video games.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 9, 2017 11:56:19 GMT
Yeah and I literally don't want to see any of those.
I don't know how you came to the conclusion that staying in competition requires using female superheroes either.
Well, that is your opinion but a lot of us female superhero fans have been waiting for DECADES to see our favourite characters on screen over 100 movies of the same male superheroes played out again and again but Hollywood never gave us that opportunity until now regardless of many female characters having much higher comic book sales than male superheroes that get their own movies and sequels. Let's not forget 'Witchblade' is one of the biggest selling comic book series of all time with higher sales than not only all of Marvel's female superhero series but Iron Man, Thor, Ant Man, Black Panther, Doctor Strange, Deadpool, Guardians of the Galaxy etc and unlike most of them this wasn't a series that started in the Golden Age or Silver Age of comics. It started in the 90s around the time Marvel was going bankrupt and outsold many of Marvel and DC's biggest selling superheroes in 20 years. A 'Witchblade' movie could go on to do the exact same thing it did in comic books in the late 90s and early 00s 'cause it presents something completely different from the same superhero formula that Marvel has played out on screen for over the past decade and something completely different than we have ever seen in movies before.
You say Marvel is leading the competition but name one female superhero by Marvel that has been as successful as Wonder Woman? With 'Batgirl' set to come out in 2019 now Marvel with have two movies to compete with when they release 'Captain Marvel' (that is if it isn't pushed back to 2020 or 2022) and 'Batgirl' could slaughter 'Captain Marvel' too with it being directed by the creator of 'Buffy the Vampire Slayer and being based on one of the biggest selling female superhero comic book series of all time by Gail Simone. And with more female lead comic book movies in development it is a competition just like it is with the male superheroes and one DC is most likely to dominate in.Yet the two biggest selling superheroes of all time are STILL Batman and Superman, Marvel haven't had a TV show as successful as Batman, Wonder Woman or Lois and Clark: The New Adventures of Superman and the Arkham series dominates all of Marvel's video games. Actually the biggest selling superhero is Spiderman. Look it up. And I could list dozens of female Marvel characters if that's all we were going to do.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2017 7:22:15 GMT
Actually the biggest selling superhero is Spiderman. Look it up. And I could list dozens of female Marvel characters if that's all we were going to do. Actually he is not. Going on EXACT figures from a proper book written by somebody who knows what they are talking about the top 10 biggest selling superhero comic book series are.
Action Comics (Superman) - 600 million Batman - 460 million Spider-Man - 360 million X-Men - 270 million Captain America - 210 million Spawn - 150 million The Phantom - 150 million Witchblade - 140 million The Avengers - 125 million Wonder Woman - 120 million And I could too and I could list all their sales but to find Marvel's biggest selling female superhero I would have to go down to 11 and then even further down to 15 with Spider-Woman in between all the other female lead series that outsold them.
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Jun 14, 2017 8:03:52 GMT
Actually the biggest selling superhero is Spiderman. Look it up. And I could list dozens of female Marvel characters if that's all we were going to do. Actually he is not. Going on EXACT figures from a proper book written by somebody who knows what they are talking about the top 10 biggest selling superhero comic book series are.
Action Comics (Superman) - 600 million Batman - 460 million Spider-Man - 360 million X-Men - 270 million Captain America - 210 million Spawn - 150 million The Phantom - 150 million Witchblade - 140 million The Avengers - 125 million Wonder Woman - 120 million And I could too and I could list all their sales but to find Marvel's biggest selling female superhero I would have to go down to 11 and then even further down to 15 with Spider-Woman in between all the other female lead series that outsold them. You can't convince him of anything, trust me. not when he thinks that anything from MCU is the pinnacle of film-making
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 14, 2017 10:38:06 GMT
Actually he is not. Going on EXACT figures from a proper book written by somebody who knows what they are talking about the top 10 biggest selling superhero comic book series are.
Action Comics (Superman) - 600 million Batman - 460 million Spider-Man - 360 million X-Men - 270 million Captain America - 210 million Spawn - 150 million The Phantom - 150 million Witchblade - 140 million The Avengers - 125 million Wonder Woman - 120 million And I could too and I could list all their sales but to find Marvel's biggest selling female superhero I would have to go down to 11 and then even further down to 15 with Spider-Woman in between all the other female lead series that outsold them. You can't convince him of anything, trust me. not when he thinks that anything from MCU is the pinnacle of film-making There's quite a few delusional MCU fans here. ArArArchStanton is 1 such delusional MCU fan who thinks that every MCU film is a masterpiece like The Godfather. And formersamhmd is another delusional MCU fan who still won't admit that the Fantastic Four, X-Men, and Avengers wouldn't have even been created if not for the Justice League, even though Stan Lee himself has admitted to that very fact.
|
|
pk9
Sophomore
@pk9
Posts: 992
Likes: 152
|
Post by pk9 on Jun 15, 2017 0:36:26 GMT
Wonder Woman isn't like crappy Captain America: The First Avenger ...at all. Other than featuring a founding member of a superhero team, fighting in a world war many years before present day, and ending with Captain Steve on a plane full of WMDs sacrificing himself to save the world...
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 15, 2017 0:42:55 GMT
Wonder Woman isn't like crappy Captain America: The First Avenger ...at all. Other than featuring a founding member of a superhero team, fighting in a world war many years before present day, and ending with Captain Steve on a plane full of WMDs sacrificing himself to save the world... 1st, Steve Trevor actually earned his rank of Captain, unlike Steve Rogers who was just handed that rank over more experienced and more qualified officers simply because he took a super PED that gave him bigger muscles and made him stronger than everyone else.
2nd, Steve Rogers didn't sacrifice himself. The last time I checked, he's not only still alive but living in a world that has cell phones and color TV and Internet and plenty of other cool things that weren't around in 1945. So not much of a sacrifice.
3rd, if you're going to use such a shaky comparison ("featuring a founding member of a superhero team, fighting in a world war many years before present day"), then you have to admit that Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk, Thor, Captain America: The First Avenger, Ant-Man, and Doctor Strange are all just copies of Superman: The Movie because they're all about a person getting superpowers and becoming a superhero and defeating a villain.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Jun 15, 2017 2:26:15 GMT
Other than featuring a founding member of a superhero team, fighting in a world war many years before present day, and ending with Captain Steve on a plane full of WMDs sacrificing himself to save the world... 1st, Steve Trevor actually earned his rank of Captain, unlike Steve Rogers who was just handed that rank over more experienced and more qualified officers simply because he took a super PED that gave him bigger muscles and made him stronger than everyone else.
2nd, Steve Rogers didn't sacrifice himself. The last time I checked, he's not only still alive but living in a world that has cell phones and color TV and Internet and plenty of other cool things that weren't around in 1945. So not much of a sacrifice.
3rd, if you're going to use such a shaky comparison ("featuring a founding member of a superhero team, fighting in a world war many years before present day"), then you have to admit that Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk, Thor, Captain America: The First Avenger, Ant-Man, and Doctor Strange are all just copies of Superman: The Movie because they're all about a person getting superpowers and becoming a superhero and defeating a villain.
The Captain title is honorary coming from his stage name. He earned it later as the leader of the Howling Commandos. Also, did you know you can be given the title of Captain just from being the leader of a group? I can go buy a boat right now and be named the Captain. Rogers did indeed sacrificed himself. It was luck that he was frozen in ice and was able to be revived. Because, you know, that happens all the time. Maybe they'll find Trevor in a mustard gas pocket floating over Europe somewhere. Yeah, and every movie is the same because they have people that made it. You are forgetting that they have scenes directly lifted from First Avenger. The alley scene has them fighting Germans and when they go to question one he takes poison to kill himself. And if you don't like the First Avenger comparison, you really are going to hate the 5th Element comparison. It's more 5th Element than First Avenger.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 15, 2017 2:41:37 GMT
The Captain title is honorary coming from his stage name. He earned it later as the leader of the Howling Commandos. Also, did you know you can be given the title of Captain just from being the leader of a group? I can go buy a boat right now and be named the Captain. That's not a rank of Captain, that's the job of Captain. Captain is both a rank and a job. The commanding officer on the bridge of a ship is usually addressed by the rest of the crew as "Captain" even if his her rank may only be Commander or Lieutenant Commander or Lieutenant. That's because it's customary to call the commanding officer "Captain" regardless of their rank because their job is Captain of the ship. Steve Rogers didn't command a ship so he wasn't performing the job of a Captain. He was called Captain because they gave him the rank of Captain over more experienced and more qualified officers simply because he took a super PED taht gave him bigger muscles and made him stronger than everyone else. Rogers did indeed sacrificed himself Like I said in my previous post, not much of a sacrifice when he's alive and living in a world that has plenty of cool things that weren't around in 1945. The alley scene has them fighting Germans You mean the alley scene in which she deflected a bullet from a bad guy, which Patty Jenkins herself has said she put in there as a homage to the alley scene in Superman: The Movie in which Clark catches a bullet from a bad guy? It's more 5th Element than First Avenger. It's more Superman: The Movie than First Avenger or 5th Element. Then again, Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk, Thor, Captain America: The First Avenger, Ant-Man, and Doctor Strange are all pretty much copies of Superman: The Movie because they're all about a person getting superpowers and becoming a superhero and defeating a villain.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 15, 2017 2:46:32 GMT
The Captain title is honorary coming from his stage name. He earned it later as the leader of the Howling Commandos. Also, did you know you can be given the title of Captain just from being the leader of a group? I can go buy a boat right now and be named the Captain. Rogers did indeed sacrificed himself. It was luck that he was frozen in ice and was able to be revived. Because, you know, that happens all the time. Maybe they'll find Trevor in a mustard gas pocket floating over Europe somewhere. Yeah, and every movie is the same because they have people that made it. You are forgetting that they have scenes directly lifted from First Avenger. The alley scene has them fighting Germans and when they go to question one he takes poison to kill himself. And if you don't like the First Avenger comparison, you really are going to hate the 5th Element comparison. It's more 5th Element than First Avenger. Even MovieBobs review says it's a perfect cross between FA and Thor, which is exactly what I've been saying since I left the theater.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Jun 15, 2017 12:38:03 GMT
Other than featuring a founding member of a superhero team, fighting in a world war many years before present day, and ending with Captain Steve on a plane full of WMDs sacrificing himself to save the world... 1st, Steve Trevor actually earned his rank of Captain, unlike Steve Rogers who was just handed that rank over more experienced and more qualified officers simply because he took a super PED that gave him bigger muscles and made him stronger than everyone else.
2nd, Steve Rogers didn't sacrifice himself. The last time I checked, he's not only still alive but living in a world that has cell phones and color TV and Internet and plenty of other cool things that weren't around in 1945. So not much of a sacrifice.
3rd, if you're going to use such a shaky comparison ("featuring a founding member of a superhero team, fighting in a world war many years before present day"), then you have to admit that Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk, Thor, Captain America: The First Avenger, Ant-Man, and Doctor Strange are all just copies of Superman: The Movie because they're all about a person getting superpowers and becoming a superhero and defeating a villain.
Actually, I'd say that Steve Rogers did more to earn his rank than Trevor did. Rogers also earned the right to the Super-Soldier formula. He wasn't born with innate powers the way Diana was, he had to earn his way. Steve did sacrifice himself, just because he ended up being revived 70 years later doesn't take away from that. Steve didn't know he'd survive. You'll have to do better than that.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Jun 15, 2017 17:26:44 GMT
The Captain title is honorary coming from his stage name. He earned it later as the leader of the Howling Commandos. Also, did you know you can be given the title of Captain just from being the leader of a group? I can go buy a boat right now and be named the Captain. Rogers did indeed sacrificed himself. It was luck that he was frozen in ice and was able to be revived. Because, you know, that happens all the time. Maybe they'll find Trevor in a mustard gas pocket floating over Europe somewhere. Yeah, and every movie is the same because they have people that made it. You are forgetting that they have scenes directly lifted from First Avenger. The alley scene has them fighting Germans and when they go to question one he takes poison to kill himself. And if you don't like the First Avenger comparison, you really are going to hate the 5th Element comparison. It's more 5th Element than First Avenger. Even MovieBobs review says it's a perfect cross between FA and Thor, which is exactly what I've been saying since I left the theater. The Thor part only comes in because of the mythology element. But it was like they used The 5th Element for the basis of the story and The First Avenger as the backdrop.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 15, 2017 17:35:14 GMT
Even MovieBobs review says it's a perfect cross between FA and Thor, which is exactly what I've been saying since I left the theater. The Thor part only comes in because of the mythology element. But it was like they used The 5th Element for the basis of the story and The First Avenger as the backdrop. I would say the Thor movie is basically the beginning and final battle. Her motivations for leaving are where First Avenger begins and the rest of the story until it gets back to Thor at the end.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 15, 2017 18:28:29 GMT
Steve Rogers did more to earn his rank than Trevor did. Rogers didn't do anything to earn his rank. Rogers was just handed his rank over more experienced and more qualified officers simply because Rogers took super PED that gave him bigger muscles and made him stronger than everyone else. Trevor earned his rank by actually going on dangerous field missions and risking his life to complete those missions, despite not having superpowers like Rogers had. Rogers also earned the right to the Super-Soldier formula. By being the biggest loser. Rogers was a loser who couldn't pass the physical to get into the Army because he was too lazy to exercise and train like everyone else. He wasn't born with innate powers the way Diana was, he had to earn his way. Steve Rogers: "Waah! Waah! Waah! I wasn't born with superpowers. It's not fair. Waah! Waah! Waah!" I'm sure many people wish they were born with the talent that Michael Jordan or LeBron James had. But they weren't. But I don't hear them complaining like Rogers that it's not fair that Michael Jordan or LeBron James were born with great talent and they weren't. I'm sure many people wish they were born the heir to the throne of England like Prince Charles was. But they weren't. But I don't hear them complaining like Rogers that it's not fair that they weren't born as royalty. Only Rogers whines and complains that it wasn't fair. "Waah! Waah! Waah! I can't pass the physical to get into the Army because I'm not as big and strong as everyone else. It's not fair. Waah! Waah! Waah!" Steve did sacrifice himself Like I said, Rogers is not only still alive but also living in a world with plenty of cool things that weren't around I 1945. Not much of a sacrifice.
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Jun 15, 2017 19:06:49 GMT
Actually the biggest selling superhero is Spiderman. Look it up. And I could list dozens of female Marvel characters if that's all we were going to do. Actually he is not. Going on EXACT figures from a proper book written by somebody who knows what they are talking about the top 10 biggest selling superhero comic book series are.
Action Comics (Superman) - 600 million Batman - 460 million Spider-Man - 360 million X-Men - 270 million Captain America - 210 million Spawn - 150 million The Phantom - 150 million Witchblade - 140 million The Avengers - 125 million Wonder Woman - 120 million And I could too and I could list all their sales but to find Marvel's biggest selling female superhero I would have to go down to 11 and then even further down to 15 with Spider-Woman in between all the other female lead series that outsold them. thanks for bringing those empty fanboy ramblings down to a facts level. Much appreciated.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Jun 15, 2017 19:48:24 GMT
Actually he is not. Going on EXACT figures from a proper book written by somebody who knows what they are talking about the top 10 biggest selling superhero comic book series are.
Action Comics (Superman) - 600 million Batman - 460 million Spider-Man - 360 million X-Men - 270 million Captain America - 210 million Spawn - 150 million The Phantom - 150 million Witchblade - 140 million The Avengers - 125 million Wonder Woman - 120 million And I could too and I could list all their sales but to find Marvel's biggest selling female superhero I would have to go down to 11 and then even further down to 15 with Spider-Woman in between all the other female lead series that outsold them. thanks for bringing those empty fanboy ramblings down to a facts level. Much appreciated. I wasn't talking about comic books. Please check out the toy sales.
|
|