|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Nov 3, 2017 7:04:58 GMT
^^^ MCU fans remind me of a 17 year old nerd who is hyper jealous of his 4 year old brother turning 5 who has already won prizes and is about to steal the attention from him.
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Nov 3, 2017 7:08:30 GMT
And people like DennisReynolds, Tristan, DC-Fan, lenlenlen, poelzig, and their ilk keep me hoping it stays second to the MCU, where it belongs, forever. Well, it's natural they'd try to turn their inferiority complex into a superiority complex. I told you not to scratch that fanboy rash, sam. And grow a thicker skin, man.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 3, 2017 13:48:35 GMT
Well, it's natural they'd try to turn their inferiority complex into a superiority complex. I told you not to scratch that fanboy rash, sam. And grow a thicker skin, man. Hey, it's not my fault that DC fans can't get over that Dark Knight wouldn't do as well in today's environment and that all they have to cling to anymore is a makeup award. Then again...once Guardians 2 (or Thor) wins the VFX Oscar you won't even have that...pitiful, really.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 3, 2017 13:49:37 GMT
Yeah...but those movies all had DC's big guns attached (Batman, Superman, Joker). Dr Strange was a relative unknown. You have to appreciate the greater context that Marvel is doing as well as it is...using character most no one knew of until a while ago. At this point it's more about brand name than the characters being well known which doesn't really count for much at all now. These movies are marketed heavily as being from Marvel. Like how Pixar movies are sold on them being Pixar and Disney movies are sold on being Disney, most of these Marvel movies are gonna make money just bring it's from Marvel. That doesn't really hold water. I mean, FOX used the "It's from the people who made Days of Future's Past!" to promote Fant4stic and we all know how THAT turned out.
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Nov 3, 2017 18:19:02 GMT
If you're going PRE shared universes DC stomps Marvel.
But lets look at the first four films of both shared universes (4 since DCEU is only 4 films in so far). Numbers in millions...
1st four films comparison U.S. Opening U.S. total World total
Man of Steel 116 291 668 Batman V Superman 166 330 873 Suicide Squad 133 325 745 Wonder Woman 103 409 820
Iron Man 102 318 585 Incredible Hulk 55 134 263 Thor 65 181 449 Captain America 65 176 370 Its doesnt look like you're winning a war when you look at it like that, does it?
The DC movies cost more to make and market and were using easily recognized characters who didn't need introduction or explanation, the MCU movies were introducing characters the general public weren't aware of.
So Marvel still did more. And are those numbers adjusted for inflation? And are DC fans still clinging to a Makeup Award?
The numbers are NOT adjusted for inflation. But neither were the Marvel ones.
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Nov 3, 2017 18:22:23 GMT
WHOA! Now you're going to include NON DCEU movies?! Well in that case... The "WAR" was won before the MCU even came into existence!
Green Lantern is not part of the DCEU as it was not the beginning of a shared universe. That Distinction belongs to MOS as you well know. But since you opened the can of worms, LETS compare Marvel pre-MCU to DC pre-DCEU...
Superman the Movie blew that shit up! Superman 2 blew that shit up! Batman blew that shit up! Batman Returns blew that shit up! Batman Begins blew that shit up! The Dark Knight blew that shit up!
If you're going PRE shared universes DC stomps Marvel.
But lets look at the first four films of both shared universes (4 since DCEU is only 4 films in so far). Numbers in millions...
1st four films comparison U.S. Opening U.S. total World total
Man of Steel 116 291 668 Batman V Superman 166 330 873 Suicide Squad 133 325 745 Wonder Woman 103 409 820
Iron Man 102 318 585 Incredible Hulk 55 134 263 Thor 65 181 449 Captain America 65 176 370 Its doesnt look like you're winning a war when you look at it like that, does it?
Yes, the first four films of the DCEU certainly benefited from all the MCU's hard work. Thank you for pointing that out. Nope. The MCU still won. Proof positive that you will turn even cold hard facts into a win for Marvel somehow. That's pure fanaticism right there!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2017 23:32:07 GMT
Yeah, and...? No really. No, Civil War was a Captain America movie. It just doesn't ignore the universe its set in. It beat BvS fair and square. Do not try to diminish its victory because it doesn't suit your narrative. Oh, please, people have been wanting to see Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman in the big screen forever. It was a guarantee. Spider-Man: it still counts, and you may as well drop it because you're not going to convince it doesn't. Domestic box office is small potatoes. They one world wide, which is the true victory. Um, no, its not world wide. Guardians Vol. 2 and Homecoming patently beat WW in the world wide market. Point is, MCU is on top. Period. Your attempts at trying to make it look like the DCEU is the winner disgust me. It was a Captain America that could have easily have just been an Avengers movie where the focus was a bit more on Captain America than the last two. It had almost the entire Avengers cast in it. A huge part of the movie revolves around what happened because of The Avengers specifically. Yes it did beat Batman vs Superman fair and square. A huge part of that was because Batman vs Superman received a critical bashing. Spider-man counts in a way. It's not money that Marvel Studios has made. Therefore in a apples to apples comparison Warner Brothers two DC movies have outgrossed Marvel Studios two movies in 2016 and likely this year as well. They get a much higher percentage from the domestic gross, it's very important. No DC isn't bigger worldwide, it doesn't seem to have the same International appeal as Marvel's just yet. No DC isn't the winner. That wasn't what I said to begin with. I said DC was on the same level as Marvel and it is considering last year at the domestic box office and Wonder Woman made a similar amount to this years MCU movies. Yeah it came up a little short in comparison but it doesn't matter at all because it's still the most profitable of them all anyway and that's what actually matters. Civil War: Yes, the Avengers were in it... for about five minutes. The major conflict everyone remembers is between Steven, Bucky, and Tony. Spider-Man is going to be in Infinity War. He counts. Period. No uses just the U.S. domestic gross (except idiots trying to bolster the DCEU's numbers). At the end of the day, people look at the world wide totals when discussing how successful a film was.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2017 23:33:28 GMT
Yes, the first four films of the DCEU certainly benefited from all the MCU's hard work. Thank you for pointing that out. Nope. The MCU still won. Proof positive that you will turn even cold hard facts into a win for Marvel somehow. That's pure fanaticism right there! Proof positive you don't know how to analyze scenario. You have no cold hard facts, because you haven't looked into what made those films gross what they did. That is pure fanaticism.
|
|
egon1982
Sophomore
@egon1982
Posts: 994
Likes: 268
|
Post by egon1982 on Nov 4, 2017 0:52:07 GMT
Only kids say "kiddie". Fact. I'm an adult and I've never seen a single adult refer to something as "kiddie". I HAVE seen plenty of young people around ages 18-23 refer to light-hearted fare as "kiddie". These are young adults desperate to establish themselves as adults and thinking they can achieve said goal by "shedding" themselves of "kiddie" things. How do they do that? The same way most emos their age do: run toward "dark" and "serious" material as a way of showing how "mature" and "adult" they are. Little do these young adults realize is that, as an adult, your taste in everything changes. You stop caring about trivial things such as "how will people perceive me for liking this?" Thoughts like those are thoughts that exist in the minds of very young people trying to establish themselves in the world and worried about criticism. It's the angsty age where everything is about image and cultivating your "adult" status. Seasoned adults in their late 20's and above adopt a very different mindset. It's the "I don't give a sh!t what people think" mindset. Little do these very young adults realize is that, as a seasoned adult, we often crave a VARIETY of tones and themes and don't single one out as "too kiddie for me". Adults don't think that way. In fact, as seasoned adults, it's much more likely for a person to choose a light-hearted movie at the end of a hard workday or workweek. It's a way to "unwind". For all those calling the MCU "kiddie", I've seen far more adults around my age (36) and even older than I did teenagers when attending them in the theaters. On the contrary, I see far more teens/early twentysomethings at the few nowadays horror movies I attended at theaters. As seasoned adults, we embrace a VARIETY of different themes and tones. In my experience, I've seen many people in the 18-23 bracket embrace darker material more than any other form. My point in all this? Only a very young person would bash a product for being light-hearted or proclaim it to be "kiddie". Adults--seasoned (been in the real world for several years, paying bills and such) adults don't think this way at all. We don't go around, calling things "kiddie" or "Mature and adult". All this grasping for "grounded" and "realistic" CBM's...there is an old expression that basically says that: "Adults crave fantasy even more than children". And, it's true. Fantasy is a form of escapism. Only a very young mind has this constant "need" for an uber-realistic product all the time. Adults enjoy a BLEND of fantasy and realistic products. Children or very young adults have tendency to gravitate toward the darker, more serious and more "realistic" material because they have this idea in their minds that "fantasy is for kids"...but, what they don't realize, is that you reach a certain point in adulthood where fantasy becomes appealing again. When that point arrives, you no longer care how that fantasy "makes you look" to others. You appreciate it as an escapism from everyday life. As a more seasoned adult, a craving for constant realism becomes less prevalent because, at that point, you already know enough about the world to decide "Hey--I need a little escapism". Now, that's not to say that seasoned adults don't want realism--we do. We just don't need a CONSTANT dosage or CONSTANT emphasis on it. We don't need it to define our lives/entertainment. THAT is the fundamental difference between real adults and young adults still trying to establish themselves. All that I think of when I see someone refer to something as "kiddie" is a very young person who is ashamed of their young age and only wants to be seen as older. And what I stated is something that a very young mind can't possibly understand until they reach that point in life...and most of us do. Those who don't become, well, manchildren. That is all I have to say. I'm 36 as i enjoyed the MCU and Deadpool as they are un-pretentious and feel like living comics. Levity and maturity go hand in hand. The harder you try to force maturity and "seriousness" the more immature and juvenile your work appears. Human beings use humor even in the most dire of situations to deal with bad things, when a person is at their lowest they want nothing more than to laugh again. When someone here compared Batman vs Superman to some humorless 90's grim gritty comics, Some of those '90s comics trying to be so dark to look "grown up" make me think of what it was like to be a teen-ager. Every teen tries to do their imitation of how they think an adult should be--wearing dark clothing, brooding, treating others like they're crap, posturing. Usually by the time you hit twenty Five you figure out that's not what being grown up is really about. If you don't, you're going to have miserable life when reality finally does hit you. And they are right, some did took the wrong lessons from Kevin Eastman's Ninja Turtles with Akira by Katsuhiro Otomo, Alan Moore and Frank Miller without understanding what made them successful comics in the 80s. And here is a great quote by philosopher/writer of Narnia books CS Lewis: Critics who treat 'adult' as a term of approval, instead of as a merely descriptive term, cannot be adult themselves. To be concerned about being grown up, to admire the grown up because it is grown up, to blush at the suspicion of being childish; these things are the marks of childhood and adolescence. And in childhood and adolescence they are, in moderation, healthy symptoms. Young things ought to want to grow. But to carry on into middle life or even into early manhood this concern about being adult is a mark of really arrested development. When I was ten, I read fairy tales in secret and would have been ashamed if I had been found doing so. Now that I am fifty I read them openly. When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up. - C.S. Lewis
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 4, 2017 1:11:49 GMT
The DC movies cost more to make and market and were using easily recognized characters who didn't need introduction or explanation, the MCU movies were introducing characters the general public weren't aware of.
So Marvel still did more. And are those numbers adjusted for inflation? And are DC fans still clinging to a Makeup Award?
The numbers are NOT adjusted for inflation. But neither were the Marvel ones. But you get my point that the MCU movies were introducing characters the public weren't very aware of vs DC using their big guns people have known of for decades, right? The MCU's been fighting an uphill battle from day one. And frankly, they still are. Pretty much every movie they put out nowadays gets the stink eye when first announced and yet they still prevail.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Nov 4, 2017 1:18:28 GMT
It was a Captain America that could have easily have just been an Avengers movie where the focus was a bit more on Captain America than the last two. It had almost the entire Avengers cast in it. A huge part of the movie revolves around what happened because of The Avengers specifically. Yes it did beat Batman vs Superman fair and square. A huge part of that was because Batman vs Superman received a critical bashing. Spider-man counts in a way. It's not money that Marvel Studios has made. Therefore in a apples to apples comparison Warner Brothers two DC movies have outgrossed Marvel Studios two movies in 2016 and likely this year as well. They get a much higher percentage from the domestic gross, it's very important. No DC isn't bigger worldwide, it doesn't seem to have the same International appeal as Marvel's just yet. No DC isn't the winner. That wasn't what I said to begin with. I said DC was on the same level as Marvel and it is considering last year at the domestic box office and Wonder Woman made a similar amount to this years MCU movies. Yeah it came up a little short in comparison but it doesn't matter at all because it's still the most profitable of them all anyway and that's what actually matters. Civil War: Yes, the Avengers were in it... for about five minutes. The major conflict everyone remembers is between Steven, Bucky, and Tony. Spider-Man is going to be in Infinity War. He counts. Period. No uses just the U.S. domestic gross (except idiots trying to bolster the DCEU's numbers). At the end of the day, people look at the world wide totals when discussing how successful a film was. They were in it for a considerable amount and the plot only happened in the first place because of The Avengers. Captain America, Iron Man, Falcon, Black Widow, Vision and Scarlet Witch all had good sized roles in that movie. It can definitely be considered an Avengers lite. Spider-man is part of the MCU yes but Homecoming was not a Marvel Studios movie, it was not a Disney movie. It's not money that they are going to get. DC have had two movies, Marvel Studios has had two movies, Fox has had one movie and Sony has had one movie. The US gross is the most accurate to make for a fair comparison. What really matters at the end of the day is profit. Wonder Woman was a more profitable movie than Spider-man or Guardians of the Galaxy. It might have grossed less but it made them more money so it was the more successful movie.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 4, 2017 1:24:33 GMT
Civil War: Yes, the Avengers were in it... for about five minutes. The major conflict everyone remembers is between Steven, Bucky, and Tony. Spider-Man is going to be in Infinity War. He counts. Period. No uses just the U.S. domestic gross (except idiots trying to bolster the DCEU's numbers). At the end of the day, people look at the world wide totals when discussing how successful a film was. They were in it for a considerable amount and the plot only happened in the first place because of The Avengers. Captain America, Iron Man, Falcon, Black Widow, Vision and Scarlet Witch all had good sized roles in that movie. It can definitely be considered an Avengers lite. Spider-man is part of the MCU yes but Homecoming was not a Marvel Studios movie, it was not a Disney movie. It's not money that they are going to get. DC have had two movies, Marvel Studios has had two movies, Fox has had one movie and Sony has had one movie. The US gross is the most accurate to make for a fair comparison. What really matters at the end of the day is profit. Wonder Woman was a more profitable movie than Spider-man or Guardians of the Galaxy. It might have grossed less but it made them more money so it was the more successful movie. Not really. Steve Rogers is the core of the movie, that's why its called "Captain America: Civil War." Homecoming still counts. I'm not budging. Nope. The MCU had three movies. You have no way of knowing how profitable each film was, actually. We have the "double the budget" rule of thumb, but we'd need to see all the exact numbers to calculate that out. As it stands, Homecoming and Guardians 2 made more, and therefore are the clear winners.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 4, 2017 1:25:59 GMT
Wonder Woman was a more profitable movie than Spider-man or Guardians of the Galaxy. It might have grossed less but it made them more money so it was the more successful movie. Considering people set out to dislike Homecoming and Guardians, this isn't wholly unexpected.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 4, 2017 1:30:08 GMT
Wonder Woman was a more profitable movie than Spider-man or Guardians of the Galaxy. It might have grossed less but it made them more money so it was the more successful movie. Considering people set out to dislike Homecoming and Guardians, this isn't wholly unexpected. And don't you just love how a supposed MCU fan is going out of his way to make the DCEU look better?
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 4, 2017 1:42:20 GMT
Considering people set out to dislike Homecoming and Guardians, this isn't wholly unexpected. And don't you just love how a supposed MCU fan is going out of his way to make the DCEU look better? Come now, you CAN enjoy both. I WANT the DCEU movies to be good.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Nov 4, 2017 1:43:09 GMT
They were in it for a considerable amount and the plot only happened in the first place because of The Avengers. Captain America, Iron Man, Falcon, Black Widow, Vision and Scarlet Witch all had good sized roles in that movie. It can definitely be considered an Avengers lite. Spider-man is part of the MCU yes but Homecoming was not a Marvel Studios movie, it was not a Disney movie. It's not money that they are going to get. DC have had two movies, Marvel Studios has had two movies, Fox has had one movie and Sony has had one movie. The US gross is the most accurate to make for a fair comparison. What really matters at the end of the day is profit. Wonder Woman was a more profitable movie than Spider-man or Guardians of the Galaxy. It might have grossed less but it made them more money so it was the more successful movie. Not really. Steve Rogers is the core of the movie, that's why its called "Captain America: Civil War." Homecoming still counts. I'm not budging. Nope. The MCU had three movies. You have no way of knowing how profitable each film was, actually. We have the "double the budget" rule of thumb, but we'd need to see all the exact numbers to calculate that out. As it stands, Homecoming and Guardians 2 made more, and therefore are the clear winners. I know the MCU had three movies. Marvel Studios had 2 movies. Budge or don't budge it doesn't matter. That's just the fact of what happened. Both DC and Marvel Studios have 2 movies each this year. I don't exactly no but going by what we do know then it can readily be worked to some extent. Studios get 55% of the domestic gross, 45% of the overseas gross and a paltry 10% from China. So a bit of math tells us that GOTG2 brought in approximately $392 million. Spider-man Homecoming brought in approximately $390 million. Wonder Woman brought in approximately $378 million. Factor in the production budget and yeah Wonder Woman comes out on top. Profit is what wins not what makes more.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Nov 4, 2017 1:45:50 GMT
Wonder Woman was a more profitable movie than Spider-man or Guardians of the Galaxy. It might have grossed less but it made them more money so it was the more successful movie. Considering people set out to dislike Homecoming and Guardians, this isn't wholly unexpected. Far far more people set out to dislike Wonder Woman in comparison to those movies considering that it was following two disliked movies. People were ready from the start to believe it was going to happen once again. Guardians 2 had it easy, it was following a critically acclaimed movie than it was a surprise hit. The opposite was true for Wonder Woman.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 4, 2017 1:51:33 GMT
Not really. Steve Rogers is the core of the movie, that's why its called "Captain America: Civil War." Homecoming still counts. I'm not budging. Nope. The MCU had three movies. You have no way of knowing how profitable each film was, actually. We have the "double the budget" rule of thumb, but we'd need to see all the exact numbers to calculate that out. As it stands, Homecoming and Guardians 2 made more, and therefore are the clear winners. I know the MCU had three movies. Marvel Studios had 2 movies. Budge or don't budge it doesn't matter. That's just the fact of what happened. Both DC and Marvel Studios have 2 movies each this year. I don't exactly no but going by what we do know then it can readily be worked to some extent. Studios get 55% of the domestic gross, 45% of the overseas gross and a paltry 10% from China. So a bit of math tells us that GOTG2 brought in approximately $392 million. Spider-man Homecoming brought in approximately $390 million. Wonder Woman brought in approximately $378 million. Factor in the production budget and yeah Wonder Woman comes out on top. Profit is what wins not what makes more. Marvel Studios made all the creative decisions on Homecoming, so they were in on making the film. So three for the MCU. SO the MCU still comes out on top no matter how you cut it.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Nov 4, 2017 2:15:04 GMT
I know the MCU had three movies. Marvel Studios had 2 movies. Budge or don't budge it doesn't matter. That's just the fact of what happened. Both DC and Marvel Studios have 2 movies each this year. I don't exactly no but going by what we do know then it can readily be worked to some extent. Studios get 55% of the domestic gross, 45% of the overseas gross and a paltry 10% from China. So a bit of math tells us that GOTG2 brought in approximately $392 million. Spider-man Homecoming brought in approximately $390 million. Wonder Woman brought in approximately $378 million. Factor in the production budget and yeah Wonder Woman comes out on top. Profit is what wins not what makes more. Marvel Studios made all the creative decisions on Homecoming, so they were in on making the film. So three for the MCU. SO the MCU still comes out on top no matter how you cut it. No they didn't make all the creative decisions. Everything was still all Sony and Columbia Pictures say. They decided on the casting and get the final word. Wonder Woman being the most profitable movie of this year's superhero movies puts it on top. Profit is everything. Civil War may have grossed over $400 million more than Suicide Squad last year but that doesn't really matter because in terms of actual profit. Civil War only made a minor $35 million profit than Suicide Squad. An Avengers lite made a small $35 million more profit than an original movie, that got bad reviews and featured mostly no named characters.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 4, 2017 2:30:12 GMT
Marvel Studios made all the creative decisions on Homecoming, so they were in on making the film. So three for the MCU. SO the MCU still comes out on top no matter how you cut it. No they didn't make all the creative decisions. Everything was still all Sony and Columbia Pictures say. They decided on the casting and get the final word. Wonder Woman being the most profitable movie of this year's superhero movies puts it on top. Profit is everything. Civil War may have grossed over $400 million more than Suicide Squad last year but that doesn't really matter because in terms of actual profit. Civil War only made a minor $35 million profit than Suicide Squad. An Avengers lite made a small $35 million more profit than an original movie, that got bad reviews and featured mostly no named characters. Nope, Guardians 2 and Homecoming making more than it put them on top. Stop trying to emulate DC-Fan. No, a Captain America movie beat a film featuring Batman, The Joker, and Harley Quinn. Seriously, give it up. The MCU's on top because they put in the hard work whereas the DCEU is a complete fucking mess. Also, stop trying to bolster the DCEU's numbers, traitor.
|
|