|
Post by summers8 on Dec 26, 2017 21:33:46 GMT
The funny thing about putting up videos of John Landis not liking the Marvel movies is that his son Max Landis makes crappy movies. John defends his son's crappy movies by going against the competition. They are savaging Bright right now. American Ultra was a crappy Jason Bourne wannabe. He'll probably say something about Black Panther because Bright has Will Smith as the lead and it's about racism, but his son is being accused of sexual assault at the moment... So maybe not. www.cinemablend.com/new/Mickey-Rourke-Hatred-Marvel-Still-Burning-66785.htmlHe continued: “[It’s] ****ing too bad, but it’s their loss. If they want to make mindless comic book movies, then I don’t want to be a part of that. I don’t want to have to care so much and work so hard, and then fight them for intelligent reasoning, and just because they’re calling the shots they… You know, I didn’t work for three months on the accent and all the adjustments and go to Russia just so I could end up on the floor. Because that can make somebody say at the end of the day, oh **** ‘em, I’m just going to mail it in. But I’m not that kind of guy. I’m never going to mail it in.”
While speaking to MTV Splash Page, Rourke blamed both the studio – for their desire to make mindless comic book movies – and Jon Favreau – for his lack of conviction (or in Rourke’s words, his lack of “nuts”) — for Vanko’s deficiencies: “If they let you play the bad guy with other dimensions other than one-dimensional. You have to fight for that though, to bring layers to the character. Otherwise, if you’re working for the wrong studio or let’s say a director that doesn’t have any balls, then they’re just gonna want it to be the evil bad guy. […] So, if you’re working with some good studio guys that got brains and you’re working with a director with a set of nuts that’ll let you incorporate that then it’s fun. Otherwise, you end up with what happened on ‘Iron Man.'”
when their own actors tells us mcu is bs. no way out. whedon also said his own avengers movies was bs. called the film half-assed made.LOL.
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Dec 26, 2017 21:48:30 GMT
Outclassed how? In your subjective opinion? At the Box Office its another story. And if you think Days of X-men Retcon is better than Winter Soldier you are insane. #teamcolden its not a subjective opinion. its film making fact. fun jokey cgi thin plotted driven movies like the MCU movies are worse than drama grounded driven compelling movies like X-Men. its just fact. iron man 3 made more than iron man 1. reason mcu is like transformers, both fan base use box office as proof their movies are good. not. disney soulless trash sells. DOFP is a better movie, winter solider is a derivative political movie of first class. it is missing the depth that first class or dofp had and lost it in the end with the classic mcu destroy city action over true story telling. this scene from dofp outclasses any scene in winter solider in depth and story telling and it only gets better. it is why you extreme mcu fans had to lie that dofp a story that came out in 1981 ripped of T2 that came out in 1992. it was to deflect MCU inferiority and you failed. want more proof? black panther is taking lessons from xmen movies like dofp to be deep and political they are not taking lessons from winter solider. comicbook.com/marvel/2017/07/23/black-panther-x-men-professor-x-magneto/
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Dec 26, 2017 21:54:51 GMT
DofP sucked. There was no deeper meaning, no important message. It was a retcon for the franchise. Calling the MCU joke driven means you dont really understand it. There is more to that than just jokes. Thor 3 was fun yes but it was also quite dramatic. Guess you missed that. But hey, you are the intelligent one. Really my poop this evening had more meaningful words to say than you. #teamcolden Saying DOFP sucked and had no deeper meaning whilst praising Thor 3 for being "quite dramatic" (spoiler: it was 99% comedy) shows how dumb and film illterate you people really are.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 26, 2017 21:56:28 GMT
Outclassed how? In your subjective opinion? At the Box Office its another story. And if you think Days of X-men Retcon is better than Winter Soldier you are insane. #teamcolden its not a subjective opinion. its film making fact. fun jokey cgi thin plotted driven movies like the MCU movies are worse than drama grounded driven compelling movies like X-Men. its just fact. iron man 3 made more than iron man 1. reason mcu is like transformers, both fan base use box office as proof their movies are good. not. disney soulless trash sells. DOFP is a better movie, winter solider is a derivative political movie of first class. it is missing the depth that first class or dofp had and lost it in the end with the classic mcu destroy city action over true story telling. this scene from dofp outclasses any scene in winter solider in depth and story telling and it only gets better. it is why you extreme mcu fans had to lie that dofp a story that came out in 1981 ripped of T2 that came out in 1992. it was to deflect MCU inferiority and you failed. want more proof? black panther is taking lessons from xmen movies like dofp to be deep and political they are not taking lessons from winter solider. comicbook.com/marvel/2017/07/23/black-panther-x-men-professor-x-magneto/My God, you are serious? What is the true story telling in DoFP? Just tell me. And you missed the fact they ripped a stadium out of the ground and dropped it around the White House? Talk about city destruction. But hey, at least the holicaust victim turns nazi story was there again. #teamcolden
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Dec 26, 2017 21:56:46 GMT
I liked it when spiderman, xmen, F4 batman ,superman became a listers because they had and still have good comic stories, some good stand alone movies, good cartoons and did not need to become Disney soulless Disney product with no identity Spidey was a soulless Sony product, X-Men and FF were soulless Fox products and Batman and Superman were soulless WB products. If we use your rules. Every example you brought up, the MCU won. Avengers EMH beats X-men TAS and Spider-Man TAS. Roughly equals Batman TAS. And still lose to the MCU.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Dec 26, 2017 21:57:33 GMT
The funny thing about putting up videos of John Landis not liking the Marvel movies is that his son Max Landis makes crappy movies. John defends his son's crappy movies by going against the competition. They are savaging Bright right now. American Ultra was a crappy Jason Bourne wannabe. He'll probably say something about Black Panther because Bright has Will Smith as the lead and it's about racism, but his son is being accused of sexual assault at the moment... So maybe not. www.cinemablend.com/new/Mickey-Rourke-Hatred-Marvel-Still-Burning-66785.htmlHe continued: “[It’s] ****ing too bad, but it’s their loss. If they want to make mindless comic book movies, then I don’t want to be a part of that. I don’t want to have to care so much and work so hard, and then fight them for intelligent reasoning, and just because they’re calling the shots they… You know, I didn’t work for three months on the accent and all the adjustments and go to Russia just so I could end up on the floor. Because that can make somebody say at the end of the day, oh **** ‘em, I’m just going to mail it in. But I’m not that kind of guy. I’m never going to mail it in.”
While speaking to MTV Splash Page, Rourke blamed both the studio – for their desire to make mindless comic book movies – and Jon Favreau – for his lack of conviction (or in Rourke’s words, his lack of “nuts”) — for Vanko’s deficiencies: “If they let you play the bad guy with other dimensions other than one-dimensional. You have to fight for that though, to bring layers to the character. Otherwise, if you’re working for the wrong studio or let’s say a director that doesn’t have any balls, then they’re just gonna want it to be the evil bad guy. […] So, if you’re working with some good studio guys that got brains and you’re working with a director with a set of nuts that’ll let you incorporate that then it’s fun. Otherwise, you end up with what happened on ‘Iron Man.'”
when their own actors tells us mcu is bs. no way out. whedon also said his own avengers movies was bs. called the film half-assed made.LOL. Rourke is a Diva who wanted the movie to be all about him and only him. Whedon retracted.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Dec 26, 2017 21:58:14 GMT
its not a subjective opinion. It is.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Dec 26, 2017 21:59:06 GMT
DofP sucked. There was no deeper meaning, no important message. It was a retcon for the franchise. Calling the MCU joke driven means you dont really understand it. There is more to that than just jokes. Thor 3 was fun yes but it was also quite dramatic. Guess you missed that. But hey, you are the intelligent one. Really my poop this evening had more meaningful words to say than you. #teamcolden Saying DOFP sucked and had no deeper meaning whilst praising Thor 3 for being "quite dramatic" (spoiler: it was 99% comedy) shows how dumb and film illterate you people really are. DOFP's sole raison d'etre was to undo X3 and everything after it. Nothing more. Ragnarok had a proper purpose, to resolve all of the remaining Thor storylines and eliminate Asgard to set up Infinity Wars.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 26, 2017 21:59:09 GMT
DofP sucked. There was no deeper meaning, no important message. It was a retcon for the franchise. Calling the MCU joke driven means you dont really understand it. There is more to that than just jokes. Thor 3 was fun yes but it was also quite dramatic. Guess you missed that. But hey, you are the intelligent one. Really my poop this evening had more meaningful words to say than you. #teamcolden Saying DOFP sucked and had no deeper meaning whilst praising Thor 3 for being "quite dramatic" (spoiler: it was 99% comedy) shows how dumb and film illterate you people really are. What was the deeper meaning in Days of X-men Retcon? Do enlighten me. And Thor was comedic and dramatic. A world got destroyed. If thats not drama what is? #teamcolden.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Dec 26, 2017 22:02:05 GMT
Seriously, though, you ask anybody who Cyclops is I bet nobody would know. You'd have to say he was leader of the X-men and what his powers are for them to even be remotely close to knowing who he is. Now, ask that same person who Iron Man is and I bet they would know. The X-men, as a whole, were A-listers. They were no where near A-listers individually. Except for Wolverine. And that's only because Wolverine was everywhere in the 90s. People only know Mystique now because of Jennifer Lawrence. Yeah, X-men is so deep thinking that people put it deep into their brains so far back that they forget about it. It's funny that you keep mentioning the X-men movies that made money. They finally make movies that people like and you latch on to it. Just like DC-Fan with Wonder Woman. I've actually seen people be surprised that Logan came out this year. Keep X-men away? And let who have it? Fox is not going to be a thing any way you look at it. Would you rather have Paramount have them and have X-men movies made by Michael Bay? X-men movies that are like Transformers movies? Full of racial stereotypes? Or even worse: TMNT? You are the delusional one. I think you guys just want to hate Disney. it will be literally impossible for two reasons. People are aged above 11, (the average mcu crowd fan base and how long mcu characters have been known or is it 9 years) marvel has been around for 75 years and was already very mainstream thanks to xmen , spiderman and F4. Cyclops has been one of their leading characters for most of those years and one of the most developed. People know who Cyclops is. Want more proof. The bad parts about xmen movies like wolverine getting more love. People as in people were mad that singer misused Cyclops because they know who he was. Did anyone know who iron man was before movies? No. Does anyone know him outside of movies? No. Will the character be z list again when rdj is done? yes. Is this like when mcu fans says tony stark is the smartest marvel character and life long marvel fans and the lame stream media said, sorry that honour goes to Reed Richards and people do know this after all many people born in the 40s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s, 2000s are still very much alive and know a lot about marvel without any movie from disney, fox or sony? True, X-men is so deep thinking. likes its hard? it could be for you afterall you had no clue why logan was compared to C.K. DOFP, X2, FC, X-Men were all praised for deep thinking comic films. mcu is praised for fun and jokes. that is fact. winter solider was the only exception, a movie DOFP still killed in 2014. this is not delusion.this is reality. like it or not. 2017 is ending. what did MCU do this year that outclassed Logan?
what did they do this year that outclassed Legion on TV? heck, even Gifted?
Maybe the kids and mcu mass crowd forgot but actual smart people did not. Ha, sorry love but the facts shows mcu movies are like transformers movies. Nice delusional projection of what mcu movies are but reality and facts says something different. mcu and transformers are twins, its all explosions and cgi. you call me delusional but I look at reality from xmen movies like X2, DOFP, FC , X-Men, Logan and i see things like depth, story telling, character driven arcs, themes and more. . I read mcu movies feedback and they are the same as transformers. You know how MCU blows up cities, make jokes, no stakes and is all comedy pop corn summer flick for the dumb mases. did you not see infinity war trailer, new york has been blown up again for fun. MCU fans making shit up about xmen= fail. Real comic book fans, Film directors , including their own directors and actors like whedon, alan taylor saying mcu movies are like transformers movies? Epic win for the facts. Check it out here. and this is just john landis. dont make me start with folks like Martin Scorsese , David Fincher, Chris Nolan, George RR Martin, Ridley Scott that all have implied mcu has damage cinema with their transformers type of movies. that is reality most film fans know and agree with. your delusion is why marvel has currently crashed and burnt in comics, films, video games, animations...you name it. DC kills marvel in all this areas and so those X-Men. reason you always have to lie.
Important question about comic movies.can you tell me how two of the directors ( Chris Nolan and James Mangold) two men that have now made the most land mark comic book movie of our modern era just happens to hate MCU movies? I do not think it is coincidence. funny, they got some of their inspirational juice from xmen movies as they found it all so deep thinking. The people that get upset about how Cyclops is used are X-men fans. You think casuals care about Cyclops? You think people that watched the animated series in the 90s cared about Cyclops? Singer made sure that nobody cared about Cyclops by dogging him. Having Wolverine talk about how much he sucks in both movies and only caring about him when Jean was dead. No point in measuring dicks. Now for Cyclops or any of the X-men to be a real A-lister, they have to go beyond just fandoms knowing them in the comics. Of course a person that has been reading X-men comics will know who Cyclops is. They are reading X-men comics. You do know that these characters came out in the early 60s, right? Where are you getting 75 years? Oh, wait, you meant 57 years. Oh. Okay. Also, X-men was doing so bad in the early years that they canceled the book and started doing reprints until the international team came in. Will Iron Man be z list when RDJ is done? Nope. You see, Iron Man is now a household name. You slap Iron Man on the screen and put someone else in the suit and people will go see it. The thing that Marvel does will is make the characters so people will like and enjoy them. More people go see Guardians of the friggin Galaxy than X-men. DoFP kill Winter Soldier? You mean by making less than 30 million more? DoFP should have made way more than a Captain America movie. I mean what happened on the next X-men movie? Since you want to compare. Oh wait. X-men Apocalypse mage 545 million while Captain America Civil War made 1.1 billion. Hmm... Now that's a movie killing the other isn't it? Saying that they said that (if they said it) is a fact. But them saying that they are like Transformers movies is an opinion. Learn the difference. Like I said before, John Landis is defending his son, Max Landis. He wants his son to be more popular than he is. Max Landis sucks. The only movie of his that took notice was Chronicle and that had more to do with the camera gimmick than the story of the movie. And we all know where Josh Trank is these days. Or do we? He disappeared after the failed Fant4stic. DC kills Marvel in everything (X-men is Marvel)? DC is the best at failing. Even their best movie is a rehash of Captain America: First Avenger. Has Chris Nolan ever said he hated the MCU? I know Mangold is trying to hold the fort for Fox. Also, do you know what a coincidence is? No it isn't a coincidence. The MCU is very popular. They are at... 17 movies? in 8 years and they are still going strong. Gotta hate the popular guy when you have been struggle for longer than they have been around. You think Aquaman will be good? Do you think New Mutants will be forgotten? Do you think Chastain is regretting being a no named villain that no one cares about in an X-men movie doomed to fail? Maybe Painkiller Jane will be a better comic book movie for her.
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Dec 26, 2017 22:03:15 GMT
Saying DOFP sucked and had no deeper meaning whilst praising Thor 3 for being "quite dramatic" (spoiler: it was 99% comedy) shows how dumb and film illterate you people really are. DOFP's sole raison d'etre was to undo X3 and everything after it. Nothing more. Ragnarok had a proper purpose, to resolve all of the remaining Thor storylines and eliminate Asgard to set up Infinity Wars. The undoing was just done with a 5 minute scene at the end. The bulk of the movie follows the same principles from the comic story. Ragnarok was just a sitcom filler. It threw the story and setup from TDW into the trash.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Dec 26, 2017 22:09:35 GMT
The funny thing about putting up videos of John Landis not liking the Marvel movies is that his son Max Landis makes crappy movies. John defends his son's crappy movies by going against the competition. They are savaging Bright right now. American Ultra was a crappy Jason Bourne wannabe. He'll probably say something about Black Panther because Bright has Will Smith as the lead and it's about racism, but his son is being accused of sexual assault at the moment... So maybe not. www.cinemablend.com/new/Mickey-Rourke-Hatred-Marvel-Still-Burning-66785.htmlHe continued: “[It’s] ****ing too bad, but it’s their loss. If they want to make mindless comic book movies, then I don’t want to be a part of that. I don’t want to have to care so much and work so hard, and then fight them for intelligent reasoning, and just because they’re calling the shots they… You know, I didn’t work for three months on the accent and all the adjustments and go to Russia just so I could end up on the floor. Because that can make somebody say at the end of the day, oh **** ‘em, I’m just going to mail it in. But I’m not that kind of guy. I’m never going to mail it in.”
While speaking to MTV Splash Page, Rourke blamed both the studio – for their desire to make mindless comic book movies – and Jon Favreau – for his lack of conviction (or in Rourke’s words, his lack of “nuts”) — for Vanko’s deficiencies: “If they let you play the bad guy with other dimensions other than one-dimensional. You have to fight for that though, to bring layers to the character. Otherwise, if you’re working for the wrong studio or let’s say a director that doesn’t have any balls, then they’re just gonna want it to be the evil bad guy. […] So, if you’re working with some good studio guys that got brains and you’re working with a director with a set of nuts that’ll let you incorporate that then it’s fun. Otherwise, you end up with what happened on ‘Iron Man.'”
when their own actors tells us mcu is bs. no way out. whedon also said his own avengers movies was bs. called the film half-assed made.LOL. That's because he wanted to be the star. He wanted Whiplash to be as big as Marv. I mean, they had to CGI Rourke's face because it's so busted up with so much plastic surgery. And it was friggin Whiplash. A nobody character. Why do you think they picked him and Mickey Rourke. Mickey friggin Rourke. Mumbling through the movie with a crap accent nobody could understand. His character served its purpose. Also, you are talking about the MCU pre-Avengers 2. When they had a committee running things. Feige is in charge now.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 26, 2017 22:11:17 GMT
DOFP's sole raison d'etre was to undo X3 and everything after it. Nothing more. Ragnarok had a proper purpose, to resolve all of the remaining Thor storylines and eliminate Asgard to set up Infinity Wars. The undoing was just done with a 5 minute scene at the end. The bulk of the movie follows the same principles from the comic story. Ragnarok was just a sitcom filler. It threw the story and setup from TDW into the trash. Mmm finding out your brother isnt dead, that you have a sister you never knew about and losing you father in front of your eyes isnt drama, real comedy. Losing the token of your power and being stranded and captured is pure comedy, not drama. Having to safe your people by destroying your home is pure laughter, nothing dramatic. Im still wating, what is the deeper meaning of Days of X-men Retcon? #teamcolden
|
|
|
Post by summers8 on Dec 26, 2017 22:11:55 GMT
its not a subjective opinion. its film making fact. fun jokey cgi thin plotted driven movies like the MCU movies are worse than drama grounded driven compelling movies like X-Men. its just fact. iron man 3 made more than iron man 1. reason mcu is like transformers, both fan base use box office as proof their movies are good. not. disney soulless trash sells. DOFP is a better movie, winter solider is a derivative political movie of first class. it is missing the depth that first class or dofp had and lost it in the end with the classic mcu destroy city action over true story telling. this scene from dofp outclasses any scene in winter solider in depth and story telling and it only gets better. it is why you extreme mcu fans had to lie that dofp a story that came out in 1981 ripped of T2 that came out in 1992. it was to deflect MCU inferiority and you failed. want more proof? black panther is taking lessons from xmen movies like dofp to be deep and political they are not taking lessons from winter solider. comicbook.com/marvel/2017/07/23/black-panther-x-men-professor-x-magneto/My God, you are serious? What is the true story telling in DoFP? Just tell me. And you missed the fact they ripped a stadium out of the ground and dropped it around the White House? Talk about city destruction. But hey, at least the holicaust victim turns nazi story was there again. #teamcolden true. eric did that in dofp for like how minutes? and from then on it was story telling, more story telling and high stakes drama. avengers spent the last 1 hour blowing up new york city having fun with it. there is a difference. the eric scene is not as damaging as the final arc of winter solider because winter solider spent more time on action. its shocking that i am serious to you,must be because you are steeping into the real world of veteran comic book readers that hate how mcu has ruined movies with their cgi driven movies. maybe you should stop attacking me and understand why mickey rouke said mcu movies are made to be mindless on purpose. he was in their movie, he does not have to lie
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Dec 26, 2017 22:13:12 GMT
DOFP's sole raison d'etre was to undo X3 and everything after it. Nothing more. Ragnarok had a proper purpose, to resolve all of the remaining Thor storylines and eliminate Asgard to set up Infinity Wars. The undoing was just done with a 5 minute scene at the end. The bulk of the movie follows the same principles from the comic story. Ragnarok was just a sitcom filler. It threw the story and setup from TDW into the trash. You saying a movie with humor can't be dramatic? Um... The entirety of DoFP was undoing X3. Just like Apocalypse undid X-men Origins, X1 and X2.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Dec 26, 2017 22:21:20 GMT
My God, you are serious? What is the true story telling in DoFP? Just tell me. And you missed the fact they ripped a stadium out of the ground and dropped it around the White House? Talk about city destruction. But hey, at least the holicaust victim turns nazi story was there again. #teamcolden true. eric did that in dofp for like how minutes? and from then on it was story telling, more story telling and high stakes drama. avengers spent the last 1 hour blowing up new york city having fun with it. there is a difference. the eric scene is not as damaging as the final arc of winter solider because winter solider spent more time on action. its shocking that i am serious to you,must be because you are steeping into the real world of veteran comic book readers that hate how mcu has ruined movies with their cgi driven movies. maybe you should stop attacking me and understand why mickey rouke said mcu movies are made to be mindless on purpose. he was in their movie, he does not have to lie You forgot about blowing up cars with Sentinels. And pulling vaults from underground, destroying the White House (a concrete explosion). Also, the end of DoFP was way more damaging because the Helicarriers landed in water. That baseball stadium landed around the White House. CGI driven movies? You think Quicksilver is a practical effect? You think Mystique is practical? You think destroying the mansion is a practical effect? Was moving a baseball stadium a practical effect? Was the jet they were flying in from the US to Paris a practical effect? Magneto stitching his neck a practical effect? Magneto using train tracks to hack into the Sentinels a practical effect? The future Sentinels was a practical effect? Any of the powers they were using all practical effects? They are all CGI driven movies. Mickey Rourke was in one movie as a villain that died. He doesn't care if he burns bridges. When was the last time Edward Norton said something bad about the MCU? I bet Rourke is gonna be salty at the Sin City series they are going to make without him too.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Dec 26, 2017 22:25:44 GMT
Also, I see Immortals in the background behind Rourke in that video. He was the main villain with more and that movie sucked balls. Guessing he had more input in that movie to make his character "better". So glad they didn't let him make Whiplash "better". That's probably what happened. He tried to give some ideas and they told him that his ideas sucked balls.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 26, 2017 22:25:53 GMT
My God, you are serious? What is the true story telling in DoFP? Just tell me. And you missed the fact they ripped a stadium out of the ground and dropped it around the White House? Talk about city destruction. But hey, at least the holicaust victim turns nazi story was there again. #teamcolden true. eric did that in dofp for like how minutes? and from then on it was story telling, more story telling and high stakes drama. avengers spent the last 1 hour blowing up new york city having fun with it. there is a difference. the eric scene is not as damaging as the final arc of winter solider because winter solider spent more time on action. its shocking that i am serious to you,must be because you are steeping into the real world of veteran comic book readers that hate how mcu has ruined movies with their cgi driven movies. maybe you should stop attacking me and understand why mickey rouke said mcu movies are made to be mindless on purpose. he was in their movie, he does not have to lie Lol. Magneto ripped the world to pieces in Apocalypse. You are a hypocrite. All those Wolverine and friends movies are the same. All dealing with that very thin philosophy of man vs mutant as a mirror for racism. Usually full of boring meaningless speeches which get re-hashed in the next Wolverine and friends movie. #teamcolden
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Dec 26, 2017 22:27:45 GMT
true. eric did that in dofp for like how minutes? and from then on it was story telling, more story telling and high stakes drama. avengers spent the last 1 hour blowing up new york city having fun with it. there is a difference. the eric scene is not as damaging as the final arc of winter solider because winter solider spent more time on action. its shocking that i am serious to you,must be because you are steeping into the real world of veteran comic book readers that hate how mcu has ruined movies with their cgi driven movies. maybe you should stop attacking me and understand why mickey rouke said mcu movies are made to be mindless on purpose. he was in their movie, he does not have to lie Lol. Magneto ripped the world to pieces in Apocalypse. You are a hypocrite. All those Wolverine and friends movies are the same. All dealing with that very thin philosophy of man vs mutant as a mirror for racism. Usually full of boring meaningless speeches which get re-hashed in the next Wolverine and friends movie. #teamcolden I know the excuse he's going to give for Apocalypse. I almost didn't use it as an example because of it.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Dec 26, 2017 22:27:57 GMT
DOFP's sole raison d'etre was to undo X3 and everything after it. Nothing more. Ragnarok had a proper purpose, to resolve all of the remaining Thor storylines and eliminate Asgard to set up Infinity Wars. The undoing was just done with a 5 minute scene at the end. The bulk of the movie follows the same principles from the comic story. Ragnarok was just a sitcom filler. It threw the story and setup from TDW into the trash. The undoing was the whole point of the movie. No, it just wasn't what YOU wanted which was for it to be a dull affair where characters show no emotions and smolder with generic rage. Instead MCU decided to do something unexpected and show us unequivocally that Loki doesn't have what it takes to be King and his actions in TDW ultimately led to the near annihilation of all the Asgardians.
|
|