|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 25, 2017 14:37:05 GMT
Then how can you know it was bad? All I had to see was the awful title and some horrendous commercials promoting the film on TV. You let a title offend you? If you actually watched the film and been unhappy with it, I'd get it... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 25, 2017 14:43:36 GMT
All I had to see was the awful title and some horrendous commercials promoting the film on TV. You let a title offend you? If you actually watched the film and been unhappy with it, I'd get it... After already seeing two terrible Spider-Man movies, why would I go see this movie? Let me just give you a simple message for you in case you haven't already gotten it already. Tobey Maguire IS SPIDER-MAN to ME and anything else with the "SPIDER-MAN" title that doesn't star Tobey Maguire can go happily suck a fat one for all I care. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 25, 2017 14:51:30 GMT
]After already seeing two terrible Spider-Man movies, why would I go see this movie? Same reason people go to James Bond movies despite his clunkers. He was good for his time, but we all gotta move on. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Nov 25, 2017 17:14:11 GMT
I didn't even see this turd and I'm 100% sure it's worse than any other live action Spider-Man project ever made.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 25, 2017 17:21:00 GMT
I didn't even see this turd and I'm 100% sure it's worse than any other live action Spider-Man project ever made. I havent seen you in real life and Im 100% you are not as bad as you seem. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 25, 2017 17:52:04 GMT
I didn't even see this turd So you can't know what it's like. |
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Nov 25, 2017 17:56:56 GMT
I didn't even see this turd So you can't know what it's like. TEN DOLLARS!!!!!!11!!!!1!!! |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 25, 2017 18:46:12 GMT
I didn't even see this turd and I'm 100% sure it's worse than any other live action Spider-Man project ever made. I've seen and I can confirm that SMH is worse than any other live action Spider-Man project ever made. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Nov 25, 2017 18:51:47 GMT
I didn't even see this turd So you can't know what it's like. Nah, I can. And do. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 25, 2017 19:12:35 GMT
So you can't know what it's like. Nah, I can. And do. You can't, not without seeing it yourself. Otherwise it's just assumption. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Nov 25, 2017 19:16:08 GMT
You can't, not without seeing it yourself. Otherwise it's just assumption. Nah, it's not. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 25, 2017 19:18:17 GMT
You can't, not without seeing it yourself. Otherwise it's just assumption. Nah, it's not. It is, burden of proof is on you. |
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Nov 25, 2017 19:26:55 GMT
I didn't even see this turd and I'm 100% sure it's worse than any other live action Spider-Man project ever made. I've seen and I can confirm that SMH is worse than any other live action Spider-Man project ever made. Suuuuuure you have. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 25, 2017 19:28:04 GMT
I've seen and I can confirm that SMH is worse than any other live action Spider-Man project ever made. Suuuuuure you have. Watch. He'll call Spider-Man 3 "a decent film" next. |
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Nov 25, 2017 19:32:27 GMT
Watch. He'll call Spider-Man 3 "a decent film" next. No worst, he'll call The Amazing Spider-Man 2 a decent film. |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Nov 25, 2017 20:36:35 GMT
It is, burden of proof is on you. Nope. You have to prove it's good, and according to harpospoke's Cartesian worldview there is no reality but what we perceive and nothing means anything. |
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Nov 25, 2017 20:37:02 GMT
I actually think Spider-man 3 and The Amazing Spider-man 2 are decent movies actually.
Spider-man 3 gets more hate than it deserves.
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 25, 2017 20:45:10 GMT
It is, burden of proof is on you. Nope. You have to prove it's good, Got to RT and Metacritic. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 25, 2017 20:46:13 GMT
I actually think Spider-man 3 and The Amazing Spider-man 2 are decent movies actually. Spider-man 3 gets more hate than it deserves. Agreed. Amazing Spider-Man 2 was mishandled, but it shouldn't have been a franchise killer. That said, I am happy Spidey came home and we have Holland now. There was just no excuse for Spider-Man 3, though. Raimi HAD to know people, including studio executives, were going to start wanting Venom to show up as early as picked to directed Spider-Man 1. There's no way he could have been ignorant to the character's popularity and the demand for him. |
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Nov 25, 2017 20:53:40 GMT
I don't think Raimi even wanted Venom in Spider-man 3 at all, he was forced to include him.
Venom should have been done over two movies, he was horribly rushed. I don't mind the TASM movies being rebooted but it was a shame the Raimi movies had to be rebooted, Spider-man 2 is still the best Spider-man movie they've made so far.
|
|
