Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2017 18:46:01 GMT
Disney wouldn't have the nuts to make that Logan movie either. They should stay with Fox for the sake of creative integrity. I don't want kiddie bullshit. For someone who hates kiddie bullshit you sure do post a lot of it. K, carrot. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2017 18:46:29 GMT
Disney wouldn't have the nuts to make that Logan movie either. They should stay with Fox for the sake of creative integrity. I don't want kiddie bullshit. The only things Logan had going for it was it being Jackman's Swan Song and the buckets of blood and gore replacing a plot. Disney wouldn't NEED to bother making something like that. And anyways, they won't be able to repeat Logan's success.
If that's what you call 'creative integrity' then Disney is better off taking over.
All Marvel movies have artificial boosters. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 30, 2017 18:56:02 GMT
The only things Logan had going for it was it being Jackman's Swan Song and the buckets of blood and gore replacing a plot. Disney wouldn't NEED to bother making something like that. And anyways, they won't be able to repeat Logan's success.
If that's what you call 'creative integrity' then Disney is better off taking over.
All Marvel movies have artificial boosters. Nah, all natural. Fox had to start relying on gimmicks. |
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Nov 30, 2017 19:10:46 GMT
Deadpool is suppose to be stupid. Also, you really want that Deadpool jerk off scene? I don't want him to not be able to say what he said in the Fox movie. Disney doesn't have the nuts to make that kind of movie. No thanks. You might want Kiddiepool, but most people don't. Fox didn't have the nuts to make Deadpool, either. They just took credit for it after it became popular. If Ryan Reynolds had to market the movie out of his own pocket, you know Fox had no faith in it. |
|
|
|
Post by No Morpho, Only Bánh mì on Nov 30, 2017 19:16:05 GMT
I don't want him to not be able to say what he said in the Fox movie. Disney doesn't have the nuts to make that kind of movie. No thanks. You might want Kiddiepool, but most people don't. Fox didn't have the nuts to make Deadpool, either. They just took credit for it after it became popular. If Ryan Reynolds had to market the movie out of his own pocket, you know Fox had no faith in it. But wait...what if it's all a genius marketing strategy? Maybe it's all part of the plan...😮 |
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Nov 30, 2017 19:39:01 GMT
The only things Logan had going for it was it being Jackman's Swan Song and the buckets of blood and gore replacing a plot. Disney wouldn't NEED to bother making something like that. And anyways, they won't be able to repeat Logan's success.
If that's what you call 'creative integrity' then Disney is better off taking over.
All Marvel movies have artificial boosters.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2017 20:21:17 GMT
I don't want him to not be able to say what he said in the Fox movie. Disney doesn't have the nuts to make that kind of movie. No thanks. You might want Kiddiepool, but most people don't. Fox didn't have the nuts to make Deadpool, either. They just took credit for it after it became popular. If Ryan Reynolds had to market the movie out of his own pocket, you know Fox had no faith in it. Disney wouldn't have made it and we both know that. But I'm glad you'll get your PG Deadpool. Really happy for you. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2017 20:21:52 GMT
All Marvel movies have artificial boosters. Nah, all natural. Fox had to start relying on gimmicks. They should change the name of the MCU to the ABU. Artificial Boosters Universe. |
|
|
|
Post by harpospoke on Nov 30, 2017 20:23:16 GMT
I don't want him to not be able to say what he said in the Fox movie. Disney doesn't have the nuts to make that kind of movie. No thanks. You might want Kiddiepool, but most people don't. Fox didn't have the nuts to make Deadpool, either. They just took credit for it after it became popular. If Ryan Reynolds had to market the movie out of his own pocket, you know Fox had no faith in it. Yeah pretty astounding how some are trying to rewrite history about Fox on that one. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Nov 30, 2017 20:32:14 GMT
Nah, all natural. Fox had to start relying on gimmicks. They should change the name of the DCEU to the ABU. Artificial Boosters Universe. Fixed. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2017 21:38:47 GMT
They can have Fantastic Four and try to make something out of that franchise, but I hope Fox keeps X-Men. To be clear, the deal is not for Marvel to get their properties back. The deal is for Disney to buy 21st Century Fox. So everything in their movie and entertainment division. That Marvel get their properties back is a consequence but its not the main objective. So what you want will only happen if Fox remains 'independent'. And that is not what they want. Yes, but given this is a Marvel board, it was their Marvel properties I was commenting on. I don't want Disney to own Fox in general because I don't want them to have a monopoly on cinema. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2017 21:45:57 GMT
To be clear, the deal is not for Marvel to get their properties back. The deal is for Disney to buy 21st Century Fox. So everything in their movie and entertainment division. That Marvel get their properties back is a consequence but its not the main objective. So what you want will only happen if Fox remains 'independent'. And that is not what they want. Yes, but given this is a Marvel board, it was their Marvel properties I was commenting on. I don't want Disney to own Fox in general because I don't want them to have a monopoly on cinema. They wont have. Universal and Warner Brothers are too big too be bought. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2017 21:55:08 GMT
Yes, but given this is a Marvel board, it was their Marvel properties I was commenting on. I don't want Disney to own Fox in general because I don't want them to have a monopoly on cinema. They wont have. Universal and Warner Brothers are too big too be bought. Only a matter of time I'm sure. Paramount will be next. |
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Nov 30, 2017 22:36:43 GMT
Yes, but given this is a Marvel board, it was their Marvel properties I was commenting on. I don't want Disney to own Fox in general because I don't want them to have a monopoly on cinema. They wont have. Universal and Warner Brothers are too big too be bought. For now. But Disney will strike when the opportunity arises! DISNEY: ONE OF US! ONE OF US! SOON YOU'LL BE ONE OF US! |
|
TheHiawatha
Sophomore
@thehiawatha
Posts: 118
Likes: 35
 
|
Post by TheHiawatha on Nov 30, 2017 22:38:41 GMT
Yes, but given this is a Marvel board, it was their Marvel properties I was commenting on. I don't want Disney to own Fox in general because I don't want them to have a monopoly on cinema. They wont have. Universal and Warner Brothers are too big too be bought. Yeah, honestly I think what we're seeing is the film industry congregating around three big brands: Universal, WB, and Disney. Wouldn't be surprised if Sony sells its film division (allowing Disney to take full control of the Spider-Man film rights), and then Paramount gets bought out by whoever didn't get Sony or 20th Century Fox. |
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Dec 1, 2017 4:39:58 GMT
I don’t know about anyone else, but the idea of one major film studio buying out another is kind of scary. Monopolies are generally considered detrimental to good business.
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Dec 1, 2017 4:44:38 GMT
I don’t know about anyone else, but the idea of one major film studio buying out another is kind of scary. Monopolies are generally considered detrimental to good business. They wouldn't be buying if Fox weren't selling. |
|
TheHiawatha
Sophomore
@thehiawatha
Posts: 118
Likes: 35
|
Post by TheHiawatha on Dec 1, 2017 4:52:45 GMT
I don’t know about anyone else, but the idea of one major film studio buying out another is kind of scary. Monopolies are generally considered detrimental to good business. I would generally agree. And I doubt we have any complete film studio/conglomerate monopolies. However, it's gonna happen whether we want it to or not. I do think we will see a bigger trend of multiple major film studios getting bought out or made into subsidiaries of bigger ones. Sony's film division has been hurting for some time, I don't think Paramount's exactly in top-notch shape, and it's now an open secret that Fox is interested in selling off its film side of things. |
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Dec 1, 2017 5:00:39 GMT
I don’t know about anyone else, but the idea of one major film studio buying out another is kind of scary. Monopolies are generally considered detrimental to good business. They wouldn't be buying if Fox weren't selling. This isn’t about buying or selling. My concern is that Disney will end up monopolizing the film industry with this. That’s not a good thing. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Dec 1, 2017 5:02:53 GMT
They wouldn't be buying if Fox weren't selling. This isn’t about buying or selling. My concern is that Disney will end up monopolizing the film industry with this. That’s not a good thing. Oh, I don't know. It isn't like Fox and WB haven't bought out other studios and incorporated them before. All the Major Studios have done it, that's how they became Major. |
|
