It’s Too Late Now For A Black Widow Movie

Really? You're either trolling or you're a fuckin' retard. You were just shown Peter looking first, and you're still denying it. Are you fuckin' slow or something?

We've (I'm black) already had Blade 1, 2, 3 and even Meteor Man.  And to a lesser extent Spawn and Steel (our Catwoman and Elektra).  You do know that most people don't rely on Rotten Tomatoes, right?  Only people that want to have scaled proof that their movie is better. 

You can so use Spider-man 3 and JL.  Spider-man 3 spent most of it's time on Peter and Mary Jane's relationship problems.  It cast aside Sandman and threw in Venom.  They didn't integrate them into the story properly.  And you can't say it's because Raimi didn't like Venom.  The entire movie was about Peter having the symbiote.  Justice League had the benefit of 3 of their players already having a movie about them.  But them having origin stories is not what I'm talking about. 

That's why you don't develop arcs for individuals.  Yes, characters like Black Widow, Hulk, and Hawkeye got individual arcs, but they left them very small and contained to that group of characters.  For the most part the Avengers movies are about the team of Avengers.  Not individuals.  Look at Black Panther in Civil War.  His character (and everybody else) arc was the movie itself.  Everybody went through the same emotional beat.  X-men did the total opposite from Justice League.  Justice League tried individuals, X-men said screw it and had everyone in the movie face toward one character to tell his* (Wolverine's) story.  Everything pointed to "What does Wolverine think about this?" 

And having it through Thanos's perspective is good this time because this is the 3rd Avengers movie.  The only new characters to the group is Strange and Wong.  Spider-man and Black Panther were with the team(s) in Civil War so we've had interactions with them.  We've had 2 Avengers movies from their perspective.   When you watch a war movie with lots of soldiers running around, do you whine about overcrowding?  Do you whine in restaurant scenes when you don't know who all the people eating at tables are and that they are getting an arc?  What about in a war room where high ranking military officers are discussing something?  Do you say this scene is overcrowded with people?  Or is it, maybe, because you know who the characters are?  Let the Avengers be the Avengers, not Captain America, Black Panther, Bucky, Iron Man, Dr. Strange, etc. etc.

*Or her.  Mystique in the prequels.

And I forgot about Guardians of the Galaxy.  All new characters, with no solo movies, and they did better "juggling" the characters.  One was even a Chewbacca/R2D2-like character that needed a translator.  They have no excuses.  DC even tried to make a Guardians with Suicide Squad and fell back on focusing on 2 characters.  They even went the X-men route of connecting the antagonist with a protagonist and giving the illusion that the protagonist is getting a story (Xavier and Magneto/Mystique, Flag and Enchantress).

Weren't looking until he did. If you watched the teaser you'd know this.



So just like the comics whenever he's ambushed.

It's better than how useless Flash is in the DCEU.

Im not biased. Giving a prediction that IW will be filled with CGI fights and explosions with little focus on story doesnt mean im trashing the film. I even said it will be entertaining but in the context of the discussion on this thread, i said these types of movies will rarely be seen as "iconic" in the same vein as Logan or TDK.

And black panther will have artificial boosts in its critical reception to some degree or another. Not sure how you think im trashing the film by saying that.

Well, there's also that when DC tried to make a female led CBM with Supergirl in 1984 it bombed so hard it set the subgenre back...and then Catwoman damn near killed it.