|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jan 15, 2018 3:56:21 GMT
I just hope it is Scarlett Johansson playing BW when the movie is made. Doubtful. The movie will keep getting delayed so ScarJo will be in her 40s before they even finalize a script. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Jan 15, 2018 12:00:57 GMT
I just hope it is Scarlett Johansson playing BW when the movie is made. Doubtful. The movie will keep getting delayed so ScarJo will be in her 40s before they even finalize a script. Nah, MCU isn't as incompetent as WB when it comes to movie scheduling. |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jan 15, 2018 20:08:02 GMT
Doubtful. The movie will keep getting delayed so ScarJo will be in her 40s before they even finalize a script. Nah, MCU isn't as incompetent as WB when it comes to movie scheduling. MCU has had a decade to make a Black Widow movie and still hasn't It'll probably be another decade before MCU has a script. By that time, ScarJo will be in her 40s. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2018 20:12:07 GMT
Nah, MCU isn't as incompetent as WB when it comes to movie scheduling. MCU has had a decade to make a Black Widow movie and still hasn't It'll probably be another decade before MCU has a script. By that time, ScarJo will be in her 40s. Good DC/WB isnt making. It took them almost 40 years to make a WW movie. And it was still mediocre. Btw How about Batsy being a murdering coward shooting people in the back from a distance? Much like what happened in Las Vegas. DC really inspired that guy. Glorified any sexual harrasment of women over the weekend? |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Jan 15, 2018 21:17:58 GMT
Nah, MCU isn't as incompetent as WB when it comes to movie scheduling. MCU has had a decade to make a Black Widow movie They couldn't make one til now because Ike Perlmutter kept saying no, not because they didn't want to make one. |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jan 15, 2018 22:00:16 GMT
MCU has had a decade to make a Black Widow movie They couldn't make one til now because Ike Perlmutter kept saying no, not because they didn't want to make one. And that's the exact same thing I said. MCU didn't want to make a Black Widow movie for a decade. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Jan 15, 2018 22:19:06 GMT
They couldn't make one til now because Ike Perlmutter kept saying no, not because they didn't want to make one. And that's the exact same thing I said. Ike Perlmutter wouldn't let the Studio make a Black Widow movie for a decade. Fixed. |
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Jan 15, 2018 22:43:06 GMT
They couldn't make one til now because Ike Perlmutter kept saying no, not because they didn't want to make one. And that's the exact same thing I said. MCU didn't want to make a Black Widow movie for a decade. MCU, which is short for "Marvel Cinematic Universe", is a product of Marvel Studios. The MCU doesn't make films, Marvel Studios does. It would be like if i kept referring Warner Bros as "DCEU". Please use the accurate term. As for Black Widow, Ike Perlmutter, former CEO of Marvel, was the only one against it. Which is why the movie didn't happened as early as it should have. He also had a major say over the films, which resulted into him clashing with feige vision, until 2015 when Bob Iger gave kevin full control. If it wasn't for Ike, not only would we have a Black Widow movie sooner, but we would have had a Black Panther film a lot sooner. Ike was a notorious racist and sexist behind the scenes. |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jan 16, 2018 1:55:23 GMT
And that's the exact same thing I said. MCU didn't want to make a Black Widow movie for a decade. MCU, which is short for "Marvel Cinematic Universe", is a product of Marvel Studios. The MCU doesn't make films, Marvel Studios does. It would be like if i kept referring Warner Bros as "DCEU". Please use the accurate term. If you want to be a stickler for semantics, fine, Marvel Studios didn't want to make a Black Widow movie for a decade because they didn't want to give lead roles to women. As for Black Widow, Ike Perlmutter, former CEO of Marvel, was the only one against it. And that's exactly what I said. Marvel Studios was against making a Black Widow movie for a decade because they didn't want to give lead roles to women. This desperate attempt by formersamhmd and you to blame Ike Perlmutter doesn't change the facts. If you bought a car from Toyota and a month later got in an accident because the car had defective brakes and you sue Toyota and Toyota says "That was the previous CEO's fault but we replaced him last week", are you going to say "OK, it wasn't Toyota's fault so I'm going to drop my lawsuit against Toyota"? It doesn't matter who was the CEO. It was Toyota that built the car with the defective brakes. Likewise, it doesn't matter who was CEO at Marvel. The bottom line is Marvel Studios was against making a Black Widow movie for a decade because they didn't want to give lead roles to women. Ike was a notorious racist and sexist behind the scenes. So you're saying that Marvel hired a racist and sexist as their CEO? |
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Jan 16, 2018 2:18:26 GMT
I mean The current President of the United States of America is a racist and sexist, so it shouldn't surprised you that Marvel has had one as a CEO. But supposedly he helped them through bankruptcy.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jan 16, 2018 6:23:04 GMT
The current President of the United States of America is a racist and sexist What does Trump have to do with Marvel hiring a racist and sexist as their CEO? Trump has been POTUS for only a year. Marvel has given lead roles in their movies only to Caucasian males for a decade so that's long before Trump became POTUS. |
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Jan 16, 2018 11:15:37 GMT
If you want to be a stickler for semantics, fine, Marvel Studios didn't want to make a Black Widow movie for a decade becauseIke Perlmutter wouldn't let them, even though they wanted to do it. No, it's not. You ignored all the people who did want it. That isn't the same, at all. I'm wondering how you kept your IT job with this limited intelligence of yours. It does. Nope, he bought up the majority of shares and they couldn't do anything about him til Disney came along and bought them out so now he was just one of the billionaires with shares. |
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Jan 16, 2018 11:57:55 GMT
The current President of the United States of America is a racist and sexist What does Trump have to do with Marvel hiring a racist and sexist as their CEO? Trump has been POTUS for only a year. Marvel has given lead roles in their movies only to Caucasian males for a decade so that's long before Trump became POTUS. Point I was making is that assholes can and will hold a high position of power. Marvel had a asshole in power, now they don't. We're starting to see some changes needed changes now. Black Panther is coming out next month which will hopefully inspired more diversity in comic book movies. Who knows? Maybe we'll finally get a Black Batman or Superman down the line. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2018 17:21:25 GMT
I mean The current President of the United States of America is a racist and sexist, so it shouldn't surprised you that Marvel has had one as a CEO. But supposedly he helped them through bankruptcy. DC-Fan is a proven sexist and fascist. There is really no need to explain the concept to him. |
|
|
|
Post by RedDeadFallout on Jan 16, 2018 20:02:17 GMT
MCU, which is short for "Marvel Cinematic Universe", is a product of Marvel Studios. The MCU doesn't make films, Marvel Studios does. It would be like if i kept referring Warner Bros as "DCEU". Please use the accurate term. If you want to be a stickler for semantics, fine, Marvel Studios didn't want to make a Black Widow movie for a decade because they didn't want to give lead roles to women. As for Black Widow, Ike Perlmutter, former CEO of Marvel, was the only one against it. And that's exactly what I said. Marvel Studios was against making a Black Widow movie for a decade because they didn't want to give lead roles to women. This desperate attempt by formersamhmd and you to blame Ike Perlmutter doesn't change the facts. If you bought a car from Toyota and a month later got in an accident because the car had defective brakes and you sue Toyota and Toyota says "That was the previous CEO's fault but we replaced him last week", are you going to say "OK, it wasn't Toyota's fault so I'm going to drop my lawsuit against Toyota"? It doesn't matter who was the CEO. It was Toyota that built the car with the defective brakes. Likewise, it doesn't matter who was CEO at Marvel. The bottom line is Marvel Studios was against making a Black Widow movie for a decade because they didn't want to give lead roles to women. Ike was a notorious racist and sexist behind the scenes. So you're saying that Marvel hired a racist and sexist as their CEO? But you've shown you're own disgusting misogyny in this very thread. |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jan 16, 2018 21:54:13 GMT
If you want to be a stickler for semantics, fine, Marvel Studios didn't want to make a Black Widow movie for a decade becauseIke Perlmutter wouldn't let them So Marvel Studios didn't want to make a Black Widow movie for a decade because they didn't want to give lead roles in their movies to women, just like I said. If you bought a car from Toyota and a month later got in an accident because the car had defective brakes and you sue Toyota and Toyota says "That was the previous CEO's fault but we replaced him last week", are you going to say "OK, it wasn't Toyota's fault so I'm going to drop my lawsuit against Toyota"? That isn't the same It's the exact same thing. Toyota built and sold a defective car. You sue Toyota. Doesn't matter who the fuck was the CEO. The defective care was built and sold by Toyota. Another example. Obama signs a bill making it a law. You can't break the law and say "Well, Trump is POTUS now so any laws signed by Obama don't count." Doesn't matter if the law was signed by George Washington or Thomas Jefferson or Abraham Lincoln or Ronald Reagan or some other POTUS. The POTUS signed the law. You have to abide by that law. It doesn't matter who was the CEO. It does. Nope. The CEO represents the company so it doesn't matter who the CEO is. Bottom line: It was Marvel Studios that made the decision to not make a Black Widow movie because Marvel Studios didn't want to give lead roles in their movies to women.
So you're saying that Marvel hired a racist and sexist as their CEO? Nope, he bought up the majority of shares and they couldn't do anything about him til Disney came along and bought them out so now he was just one of the billionaires with shares. The board votes for the CEO. So Marvel's board voted for a racist and sexist as their CEO. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2018 22:01:59 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Jan 16, 2018 22:18:28 GMT
So Perlmutter didn't want to make a Black Widow movie for a decade because he didn't want to give lead roles in the movies to women, just like I said. Fixed. It's the exact same thing. No, it's not. Your senility is seeping through. You mean like how Trump has done his best to repeal Obamacare and is winning? Yes, it does. It's also why Disney removed him. His influence was toxic. Nope, he just had the majority Shares. Like how Bruce Wayne bought up all the shares to gain control of Wayne Enterprises in Nolan's movies so he could steal from his shareholders. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2018 8:32:30 GMT
It would suck big time as a movie. She has no superpowers and is surrounded by people who do. I would rather watch a Hawkeye movie but they're only pushing this because of political and social influence to have a "strong" female character after they already butchered Black Widow in Age of Ultron making her a petty love interest for Banner and being called a monster because she cant have children. But a Batman movie is in order for the DCEU? Hypocrite. |
|
Peter B. Parker
Sophomore
Watch the hands, not the mouth
@babygroot
Posts: 853
Likes: 411
 
|
Post by Peter B. Parker on Jan 17, 2018 18:44:32 GMT
Better late than never
|
|
