|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Apr 29, 2018 23:03:53 GMT
Because you spend most of your time trashing MCU movies nitpicking every single detail and taking things to the extreme and are always first to defend DC and claim Marvel copied them. Kevin Feige himself has admitted that MCU copies most of their movies from Superman: The Movie. And if Avengers 4 goes back in time and reverses the ending of Infinity War, then Avengers 4 will have copied Superman: The Movie once again. You've rated every MCU movie as a 1/10 That's false. I rated Iron Man a 2/10 and rated Winter Soldier a 3/10. So answer the question, how is Infinity War a 1/10( lowest of the low, on the level of Birdemic, Disaster Movie, and Final Justice) but Justice League is a 9/10( one star away from a perfect 10/10 which like on the level of Citizen Kane, The Godfather, and Yojimbo)? I rate Justice League a 8/10. And I didn't rate Infinity War a 1/10. Do you see a 1/10 vote here? Rate AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR (2018)I see that there are three zero votes (not by me) so at least 3 other people think Infinity War is a 0/10. It's not copying if its a harmless paying homage, and no if they do that it doesn't mean they are copying suggested movie as there are a plethora of other films using similar time travel situations and stories from the actual source material using similar time travel situations. 2/10 and 3/10 are still fairly low ratings, in comparison with your usual 1/10's they do not suggest a huge spike in likability of a product. In other words, you're still awarding them a failing grade. Just the same, an 8/10 is still a pretty high rating and by giving it such you are still awarding the product a passing grade. You clearly do not like the film, so your score is gonna be fairly low, no matter the number it still equates to a failing grade. And the three others who think the film is a 0/10 are trolls with little to no credibility.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 30, 2018 4:19:08 GMT
That's false. I rated Iron Man a 2/10 and rated Winter Soldier a 3/10. Oh damn! You rated 2 MCU movies out of 20 something slightly higher than 1/10! Forgive me for ever saying you were biased against MCU! My mistake! He actually means the reverse. 2/10 for Iron Man is actually 8/10. Winter Soldier becomes 7/10. Therefore he enjoyed Iron Man more than Winter Soldier. Applies to the DCEU too, just subtract the number from 10 or the total.
|
|
|
Post by harpospoke on Apr 30, 2018 4:28:59 GMT
Ha...alright Thanos. Make up your mind. Do you want to give kids dark material to view or are you concerned about their welfare. Because viewing things does have an effect on you. I call bullshit because I grew up watching Friday the 13th and I never put on a hockey mask and butchered horny teenagers. Let kids have dark material, especially in comic book movies. As for their well being? Sorry for being against the school shootings. You aren't that much against them if you are eager to have kids exposed to dark material. Or maybe you believe environment has no effect on behavior. Maybe you rest that idea on the fact that not EVERY kid does violent things after being exposed to it. In that case you shouldn't worry about school shootings since not every school is attacked.
|
|
|
Post by harpospoke on Apr 30, 2018 4:34:44 GMT
Not seeing anything close to an excuse for what he did. It's certainly NOTHING like what Stark did in CW. Half the life in the universe. Starlord knew that was what was at stake too. Even a villain character would know what the priority was in that situation. Quill should stay dead for that one. The most selfish act in the history of the fictional universe. I'm actually thinking that's the most selfish act in movie history. Can't think of a worse one. But then again, what he did was suppose to happen. Not according to his plan, but the plan of the universe. Remember, this is what is suppose to happen for that one win to occur. If Quill didn't do what he did, then that would be another loss for the good guys. Good point there. I'm sure Dr Strange would have acted in some way to prevent his selfish act if it wasn't a part of the "1 in 14 million" success. But boy....that's like Stalin killing 20 million people and having that be a part of a master plan to win something. You still don't want to be Stalin.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Apr 30, 2018 6:05:52 GMT
Love the ending! It was daring and different, BUT... And maybe this is just unavoidable anyways, the Soul stone is most likely going to be used to as a Plot Point/MacGuffin in the next film to bring some characters back, so it does somewhat seem like a cop out and more just for shock effect. I wish they had killed off more Avengers in a non-infinity-gauntlet way. Meaning I wish more people were killed off like Loki and Vision and Gamora, etc. It would have made more of an impact than getting turned to dust.
|
|
|
Post by Larcen26 on Apr 30, 2018 13:52:05 GMT
My current theory is that Guardians 3 will be literally called "The Search for Gamora" with all of the art mimicing Star Trek 3. She will have taken Red Skull's place and they have to figure out how to release her. Red skull wasnt a sacrifice. He rainbow bridge teleported I will see it again next week with my sister but i thought Skull referred to the sacrifice as cruel. I don't believe he has anything to sacrifice. He wasn't a sacrifice. Doesn't mean that what I said won't happen. I think that when the Soul Stone was taken, Red Skull was released from his imprisonment because there is nothing left to guard. Then when Thanos is defeated, the Soul Stone will return to the resting place, and Gamora will be chosen as the new Watcher.
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Apr 30, 2018 15:18:44 GMT
Red skull wasnt a sacrifice. He rainbow bridge teleported I will see it again next week with my sister but i thought Skull referred to the sacrifice as cruel. I don't believe he has anything to sacrifice. He wasn't a sacrifice. Doesn't mean that what I said won't happen. I think that when the Soul Stone was taken, Red Skull was released from his imprisonment because there is nothing left to guard. Then when Thanos is defeated, the Soul Stone will return to the resting place, and Gamora will be chosen as the new Watcher. Interesting theory. I wonder who the guarded the soul stone before The Red Skull.
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Apr 30, 2018 15:19:23 GMT
Love the ending! It was daring and different, BUT... And maybe this is just unavoidable anyways, the Soul stone is most likely going to be used to as a Plot Point/MacGuffin in the next film to bring some characters back, so it does somewhat seem like a cop out and more just for shock effect. I wish they had killed off more Avengers in a non-infinity-gauntlet way. Meaning I wish more people were killed off like Loki and Vision and Gamora, etc. It would have made more of an impact than getting turned to dust. I thought when Stark was stabbed that was going to be his big death scene.
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Apr 30, 2018 15:24:34 GMT
I wish they had killed off more Avengers in a non-infinity-gauntlet way. Meaning I wish more people were killed off like Loki and Vision and Gamora, etc. It would have made more of an impact than getting turned to dust. The thought when Stark was stabbed that was going to be his big death scene. So basically you cried when you thought Tony was dead.
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Apr 30, 2018 15:26:45 GMT
The thought when Stark was stabbed that was going to be his big death scene. So basically you cried when you thought Tony was dead. Actually, it was the ending of Logan that made me cry. Also, that's not what "basically" means.
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Apr 30, 2018 15:27:56 GMT
So basically you cried when you thought Tony was dead. Actually, it was the ending of Logan that made me cry. Also, that's not what "basically" means. You cried at the end of Logan?! You mark. I wasn't crying. You were crying.
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Apr 30, 2018 15:28:45 GMT
Actually, it was the ending of Logan that made me cry. Also, that's not what "basically" means. You cried at the end of Logan?! You mark. I wasn't crying. You were crying. That's still not what that means.
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Apr 30, 2018 15:30:21 GMT
You cried at the end of Logan?! You mark. I wasn't crying. You were crying. That's still not what that means. So basically you're as ignorant as you are arrogant.
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Apr 30, 2018 15:31:06 GMT
That's still not what that means. So basically you're as ignorant as you are arrogant. You've used both incorrectly.
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Apr 30, 2018 15:32:10 GMT
So basically you're as ignorant as you are arrogant. You've used both incorrectly. The word "both" didn't even appear in my response. You've used your ineffectual, throwaway response incorrectly.
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Apr 30, 2018 15:33:18 GMT
You've used both incorrectly. The word "both" didn't even appear in my response. You've used your ineffectual, throwaway response incorrectly. I didn't use quotes. You have to know what the punctuation means too.
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Apr 30, 2018 15:36:01 GMT
The word "both" didn't even appear in my response. You've used your ineffectual, throwaway response incorrectly. I didn't use quotes. You have to know what the punctuation means too. Still wrong.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Apr 30, 2018 16:04:45 GMT
But it is still how it was meant to go. If he didn't disobey and act selfish like a robot that follows a "script" instead of his emotions like a person then what they did would have gone in that 14,000,602 losses. The thing about that is that Strange did not tell them that what they were doing constituted into that 1 win. That's why the writing is so awful. If the only way to win was to give Thanos the time stone, then why even try to get the gauntlet off Thanos' hand? What if they had succeeded in getting the gauntlet off Thanos' hand before Strange could give Thanos the time stone? Would that have resulted in a losing scenario? If so, then it made no sense at all to even attempt to get the gauntlet off Thanos' hand since the risk of a losing scenario was too great. Like I said, really awful writing! How many stones did Thanos have at that time? Only 4. What would Thanos do when he got the time stone? He would go to Earth to get the mind stone. For Strange, what they did was a distraction. And he knew they wouldn't get the gauntlet off. He saw the outcome. Dude, you like a movie were the outcome relied on the names of the main characters' moms. That alone makes anything else a masterpiece.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Apr 30, 2018 16:17:42 GMT
But then again, what he did was suppose to happen. Not according to his plan, but the plan of the universe. Remember, this is what is suppose to happen for that one win to occur. If Quill didn't do what he did, then that would be another loss for the good guys. Good point there. I'm sure Dr Strange would have acted in some way to prevent his selfish act if it wasn't a part of the "1 in 14 million" success. But boy....that's like Stalin killing 20 million people and having that be a part of a master plan to win something. You still don't want to be Stalin. Depending on how they bring everyone back, only Stark and Nebula would know. I'm wondering if they'll do it with time travel. But, now that I think about it, it would be a good idea to have the Guardians remember so you can have that drama for Guardians 3. They did a bit about the captain of the Milano in IW.
|
|
|
Post by Larcen26 on Apr 30, 2018 16:24:02 GMT
But it is still how it was meant to go. If he didn't disobey and act selfish like a robot that follows a "script" instead of his emotions like a person then what they did would have gone in that 14,000,602 losses. The thing about that is that Strange did not tell them that what they were doing constituted into that 1 win. That's why the writing is so awful. If the only way to win was to give Thanos the time stone, then why even try to get the gauntlet off Thanos' hand? What if they had succeeded in getting the gauntlet off Thanos' hand before Strange could give Thanos the time stone? Would that have resulted in a losing scenario? If so, then it made no sense at all to even attempt to get the gauntlet off Thanos' hand since the risk of a losing scenario was too great. Like I said, really awful writing! If there was only one way to win, and Strange knew it...he knew that having them all involved in a fight, almost succeeding, having Thanos think that he "won" the stone, had to all be part of it. Scenario 983,473 had them succeed in getting the gauntlet off and he killed Tony in the fight afterwards, still got the gauntlet back, and still took the time stone. Scenario 745 had him kill Star Lord in order to keep him from screwing up, then Nebula, Mantis and Drax rebelled and that fight got them all killed. Scenario 643,779 had him just give Thanos the Time stone without the fight, Tony freaked out and tried to take it back, and both Tony and Nebula got killed by Thanos. Scenario 5,396 had him sacrifice Tony for the stone and ran. Thanos then killed the entirety of the human race instead of just half through a massive war. Scenario 82,443 had him tell everyone exactly what they all had to do in order to defeat Thanos, and because they had all that information they got cocky and messed up a single small piece. Scenario 23 had everything happen the same way as it did in the movie, and it still didn't work. But one option...just one...had everything happen the way it did in the movie...and that was the first step to defeating him.
|
|