Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 4, 2017 4:09:55 GMT
And if Marvel paid critics, then Inhumans and Iron Fist wouldn't be rated where they are. Would film critics, if paid by Marvel Film Studios, normally rate television shows? They'd be bribing the TV critics, too.
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Nov 4, 2017 22:13:52 GMT
There's a connection because you want to make it, not because it actually is.As people can't prove marvel paid critics you can't prove that critics were easy on the film because of that tragic event And if Marvel paid critics, then Inhumans and Iron Fist wouldn't be rated where they are. i don't believe marvel paid critics as i don't believe TDK is appreciated only because Ledger died. both assumptions are tin-foil hats theories for people to feel better that they don't like movies that critics liked
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Nov 5, 2017 6:15:24 GMT
Also from that article: "As I've said countless times, I wish that folks who discuss Rotten Tomatoes, and that includes Rotten Tomatoes itself, would point out the average critic ranking along with the yay/nay score. Because since a 6/10 is enough for a "fresh" score, using the binary system A) penalizes divisive films, B) creates an impression that a three-star movie has earned near-unanimously rave reviews and C) can sometimes create an impression that a movie is better or worse received than it actually was. The obvious example is Batman v Superman, which had just 27% positive reviews but an average score of 4.9/10. That's still not good, but a proverbial 5/10 looks a lot better than what is perceived by the masses as a 2.7/10 score."
Just to put a little perspective on it.
Yeah I know how the scoring works. You really don't need to point that out.
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Nov 6, 2017 20:34:17 GMT
Also from that article: "As I've said countless times, I wish that folks who discuss Rotten Tomatoes, and that includes Rotten Tomatoes itself, would point out the average critic ranking along with the yay/nay score. Because since a 6/10 is enough for a "fresh" score, using the binary system A) penalizes divisive films, B) creates an impression that a three-star movie has earned near-unanimously rave reviews and C) can sometimes create an impression that a movie is better or worse received than it actually was. The obvious example is Batman v Superman, which had just 27% positive reviews but an average score of 4.9/10. That's still not good, but a proverbial 5/10 looks a lot better than what is perceived by the masses as a 2.7/10 score."
Just to put a little perspective on it.
Yeah I know how the scoring works. You really don't need to point that out. Its just that sometimes it seems like I do.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Nov 6, 2017 22:08:26 GMT
Yeah I know how the scoring works. You really don't need to point that out. Its just that sometimes it seems like I do. Well you don't with me. I promise I get it.
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Nov 6, 2017 22:12:28 GMT
Its just that sometimes it seems like I do. Well you don't with me. I promise I get it. nah, i agree with lenlenlen, you don't. You did not even get the title of this thread right.
|
|
|
Post by darkpast on Nov 7, 2017 4:51:32 GMT
It was Wonder Woman a few months ago, so it really means nothing, those movies were acceptable but no masterpieces
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Nov 7, 2017 7:49:58 GMT
Its just that sometimes it seems like I do. Well you don't with me. I promise I get it. Except it's painfully obvious to everyone else YOU DON"T!!!!!! AT ALL!!!!!!!! Your thread titles proves you are kind of clueless since Thor is NOT the highest ranked comic book movie ever.
|
|