|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Aug 2, 2018 16:21:09 GMT
You identify as straight, but from your statement, you are implying that you have bisexual tendencies, but have not acted upon them. In other words, you are in touch with your inner homo, but choose to fly straight. I believe many men will choose this route as well, due to the construct of what is seen as 'normative' in society. I guess I have been lucky in the sense that I don't have a swinging pendulum. I may have struggled to accept my sexuality for the longest time, but it was undeniably ingrained and etched into my physical being. I had no choice. I feel it must be more difficult for bisexual men, because they will be more torn about what they really want. At least bisexual men who have children, would be more compassionate if they have gay kids—or I would like to think that they would.
For the straight herd to see a sexuality as a deviation—and I am not talking about all the other confounded attributes that have been included into the LGB alphabet soup—is still taking a condescending approach to what they only believe to be normal. Yes, I agree! In a perfect world, it wouldn't be compartmentalized as something different, but being an activist for the delusions of the other labels and tags that has nothing to do with the notion of sexual attraction for either male, female or both, is missing the essence, getting astray and is way too complex. It does not do any favors for those that are homosexual or are in touch with their homosexual side. Anything outside of LGB, does not appear relevant to me, so I don't care for the movement whatsoever, whatever and wherever it is.
Just a question, since I haven't had much contact with the LG community in the past 25 years, what does the IQA stand for? Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Intersex Queer Asexual
|
|
|
Post by rachelcarson1953 on Aug 2, 2018 16:28:15 GMT
Just a question, since I haven't had much contact with the LG community in the past 25 years, what does the IQA stand for? Intersex, Queer and Asexual Thanks, Toasted Cheese!
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Aug 2, 2018 22:49:45 GMT
For the straight herd to see a sexuality as a deviation—and I am not talking about all the other confounded attributes that have been included into the LGB alphabet soup—is still taking a condescending approach to what they only believe to be normal. "Deviation" simply means: Not on the main road. Considering an estimated 80% follow the straight road, anything LGBTIQA can be called a deviation, without condescending value statements. In fact, it's less condescending to call one of LGBTIQA a deviation than to call a very diverse group of people a "herd". being an activist for the delusions of the other labels and tags that has nothing to do with the notion of sexual attraction for either male, female or both, is missing the essence, getting astray and is way too complex. You are entitled to your opinion, even if it's not backed up by rational arguments. It does not do any favors for those that are homosexual or are in touch with their homosexual side. Anything outside of LGB, does not appear relevant to me, so I don't care for the movement whatsoever, whatever and wherever it is. Then we'll just have to agree to disagree.
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Aug 3, 2018 6:02:02 GMT
So by your comment then, you are implying that the main road is the 'straight' road, which implies 'normality'. That is looking at something with blinkers on. There is no normal or main road regarding a sexuality. I didn't say anything about normality. You brought it up. The main road is simply the road used by most people. You have even admitted you follow this straight sexuality road, which is only an illusion and construct of your own mind for the need of a 'normality' concept to be attributed to you. Technically I don't follow any road. I mentioned that I never had sexual or romantic relationships with anyone else. I am a 51 year old virgin. But on average, I find women more attractive than men.
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Aug 4, 2018 9:23:34 GMT
So by your comment then, you are implying that the main road is the 'straight' road, which implies 'normality'. That is looking at something with blinkers on. There is no normal or main road regarding a sexuality. I didn't say anything about normality. You brought it up. The main road is simply the road used by most people. You have even admitted you follow this straight sexuality road, which is only an illusion and construct of your own mind for the need of a 'normality' concept to be attributed to you. I am a 51 year old virgin. Holey Moley. What about masturbation? Have you ever had an orgasm? Sorry, I guess I'm intrigued.
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Aug 4, 2018 9:29:03 GMT
What about masturbation? Have you ever had an orgasm? Did I call myself asexual?
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Aug 4, 2018 9:35:07 GMT
What about masturbation? Have you ever had an orgasm? Did I call myself asexual? I was just wondering. So, what's stopped you? IMO having sex at least once is one of three experiences every human being should have.
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Aug 4, 2018 9:38:30 GMT
Here's a great article about what's happening in Sweden: "Egalia, a new state-sponsored pre-school in Stockholm, is dedicated to the total obliteration of the male and female distinction. There are no boys and girls at Egalia—just "friends" and "buddies." Classic fairy tales like Cinderella and Snow White have been replaced by tales of two male giraffes who parent abandoned crocodile eggs. The Swedish Green Party would like Egalia to be the norm: It has suggested placing gender watchdogs in all of the nation's preschools. "Egalia gives [children] a fantastic opportunity to be whoever they want to be," says one excited teacher. (It is probably necessary to add that this is not an Orwellian satire or a right-wing fantasy: This school actually exists.) " You can give a boy a doll but you can't make him play with it.
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Aug 4, 2018 9:42:45 GMT
Did I call myself asexual? I was just wondering. So, what's stopped you? IMO having sex at least once is one of three experiences every human being should have. Asexuality is the lack of sexual attraction to others, or low or absent interest in or desire for sexual activity.
I am sorry dude but once again I am amazed at level of absurdity some people display. How do you impose your own beliefs on others. if the herd believes that sex is very important then it applies to each and every individual? People like you think it is impossible to for someone to not feel very strong sexual needs. Well, there are 7 billion people on this planet. Some would be different.
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Aug 4, 2018 9:45:57 GMT
Did I call myself asexual? I was just wondering. So, what's stopped you? IMO having sex at least once is one of three experiences every human being should have. People find what's best for them. It is not something that you prescribe to others. It is natural mechanism within people what drives them to do things. They choose activities in order of what gives them maximum utility. To not understand or not be able to understand depicts limit of your understanding of other human beings.
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Aug 4, 2018 9:47:12 GMT
I was just wondering. So, what's stopped you? IMO having sex at least once is one of three experiences every human being should have. Asexuality is the lack of sexual attraction to others, or low or absent interest in or desire for sexual activity.
I am sorry dude but once again I am amazed at level of absurdity some people display. How do you impose your own beliefs on others. if the herd believes that sex is very important then it applies to each and every individual? People like you think it is impossible to for someone to not feel very strong sexual needs. Well, there are 7 billion people on this planet. Some would be different.
I thought 'Did I call myself asexual?' was a rhetorical question, meaning he isn't asexual. Why else would he reply 'Did I call myself asexual' when asked if he masturbated? ...and the part I bolded is simply not true at all.
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Aug 4, 2018 9:48:22 GMT
Asexuality is the lack of sexual attraction to others, or low or absent interest in or desire for sexual activity.
I am sorry dude but once again I am amazed at level of absurdity some people display. How do you impose your own beliefs on others. if the herd believes that sex is very important then it applies to each and every individual? People like you think it is impossible to for someone to not feel very strong sexual needs. Well, there are 7 billion people on this planet. Some would be different.
I thought 'Did I call myself asexual?' was a rhetorical question, meaning he isn't asexual. Why else would he reply 'Did I call myself asexual' when asked if he masturbated? Ok, My bad and I apologise to you for misunderstanding.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Aug 4, 2018 9:52:19 GMT
I was just wondering. So, what's stopped you? IMO having sex at least once is one of three experiences every human being should have. People find what's best for them. It is not something that you prescribe to others. It is natural mechanism within people what drives them to do things. They choose activities in order of what gives them maximum utility. To not understand or not be able to understand depicts limit of your understanding of other human beings. Or they find what they think is best for them, even if it isn't.
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Aug 4, 2018 9:53:39 GMT
People find what's best for them. It is not something that you prescribe to others. It is natural mechanism within people what drives them to do things. They choose activities in order of what gives them maximum utility. To not understand or not be able to understand depicts limit of your understanding of other human beings. Or they find what they think is best for them, even if it isn't. You are right. But that is still a good thing. Person makes a bad choice on her own. and not driven by social pressure.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Aug 4, 2018 10:02:23 GMT
Or they find what they think is best for them, even if it isn't. You are right. But that is still a good thing. Person makes a bad choice on her own. and not driven by social pressure. Can't argue that one. It would be like arguing against the concept of free will.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Aug 4, 2018 10:55:09 GMT
Or they find what they think is best for them, even if it isn't. How would you know what is best for others though? That is like telling them what they could or should be doing, because they don't understand what you think they should. Did I say that I would know what is best for them, Mr. Poopy Pants? Take what you want and pay for it, says God.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Aug 4, 2018 11:14:43 GMT
Did I say that I would know what is best for them, Mr. Poopy Pants? Take what you want and pay for it, says God. Yes you did. You said...or they find what they think is best for them. How the frig would you know what is best for these abstract others once they find what they think is best for them? Who are they, what did they find? No, I didn't. You're lying again. A heroin addict might see a needle in the arm as what is best for him....but is it really? A Donald Trump supporter might see Donald Trump as what is best for him.....but is he really?
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Aug 4, 2018 11:29:43 GMT
No, I didn't. You're lying again. A heroin addict might see a needle in the arm as what is best for him....but is it really? A Donald Trump supporter might see Donald Trump as what is best for him.....but is he really? You throw around the lies comeback, whenever you get called out about your own lies and are confronted with them. Where is the acknowledgement? I don't recall lying about anything, but if you can show me where I've lied, I'll acknowledge it. All I said is that what someone thinks is best my not actually be best. And this statement could apply to several other things besides sick and perverted homosexual dick-up-the-ass.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Aug 4, 2018 11:44:28 GMT
I don't recall lying about anything, but if you can show me where I've lied, I'll acknowledge it. All I said is that what someone thinks is best my not actually be best. And this statement could apply to several other things besides sick and perverted homosexual dick-up-the-ass. My question to you, was how would you know that the someone, whoever they are, who thinks they know what is best for them, may not actually be the best for them?
Just your bigoted and offensive attitude towards homosexuals and your delusional beliefs and mind tantrums are enough to write off any inkling of credibility you think you possess. I know you can't answer the question, because you DON'T know what is best for others. I doubt you even know what is best for yourself and since best is all subjective, it's really not logical variable anyway.
I already answered it. What are you doing here anyway? The thread is for straight people only. Yes, you are being marginalized.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Aug 4, 2018 12:01:47 GMT
I already answered it. What are you doing here anyway? The thread is for straight people only. Yes, you are being marginalized. It was aimed at genuine straight people— I doubt the op was aware he was marginalizing when he said 'only' and that is a dead give away itself—not closet cases like yourself. Observe as Toasted Cheese resorts to the "closet case" attack. It's all he has left at this point.
|
|