|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 4, 2019 3:17:32 GMT
So you want to censor all differing and dissenting opinions? You're not looking to have a healthy debate. You're just instigating for fun and feeding off of the frustration of others. No, I'm just answering scabab's question: "how does that devalue the female characters again?" by explaining how Black Panther devalues and demeans women by portraying them as incapable of standing up for themselves and being nothing more than helpless damsel-in-distress who needs a man to fight her battles for her.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jun 4, 2019 3:33:16 GMT
Why are you mentioning another character from another movie entirely? Because that's an example of a female character who had no battle training at all but still had the courage to fight for her throne herself rather than being a damsel-in-distress who needs a man to fight her battle for her like Shuri did in Black Panther. Did you bump this thread just to troll or something? No, I'm just replying to your question: "how does that devalue the female characters again?" by explaining how Black Panther devalues and demeans women by portraying them as incapable of standing up for themselves and being nothing more than helpless damsel-in-distress who needs a man to fight her battles for her. People on this board whined endlessly that I was creating too many new threads and you wrote in a recent thread: "I don't know why he just doesn't bump one of the older threads. At least update it with one of his atrocities from Endgame or something." imdb2.freeforums.net/thread/168813/steve-rogers-power-hungry-tyrant?page=4So I replied to a question in an old thread rather than creating a new thread and people on this board are still whining endlessly.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Jun 4, 2019 4:26:38 GMT
You're not looking to have a healthy debate. You're just instigating for fun and feeding off of the frustration of others. No, I'm just answering scabab's question: "how does that devalue the female characters again?" by explaining how Black Panther devalues and demeans women by portraying them as incapable of standing up for themselves and being nothing more than helpless damsel-in-distress who needs a man to fight her battles for her. Actually it doesn't, it shows Shuri as not being so arrogant and bull headed in thinking she a teenage princess and scientist is a physical match in traditional combat with a trained warrior and killer like Killmonger, also shows he to be selfless, if M'Baku challenged Killmonger and won HE would be king, he would claim the throne not Shuri, now it's very likely if they could have say gotten Okoye to side with them and either her or Nakia were of royal blood they could challenge Killmonger for the throne as both of them are skilled and trained fighters, so they would stand a chance, and then they may relinquish the throne to Shuri but as it seems neither could have even if they wanted to, only Shuri or M'Baku could challenge for the crown and M'Baku is a better choice.
And this shows the selflessness of Shuri & her mother, they would rather give up the throne for good to prevent Killmonger trampling Wakandan traditions for his plans to spread death and violence through the world, they would rather M'Baku who does atleast believe in their traditions and the spirit of them to be king so long as it kept them from losing what made them different.
But you are a demented troll so whatever.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Jun 4, 2019 5:08:46 GMT
Because that's an example of a female character who had no battle training at all but still had the courage to fight for her throne herself rather than being a damsel-in-distress who needs a man to fight her battle for her like Shuri did in Black Panther. It's a useless example because you're comparing two entirely different things. Snow White, training and becoming a warrior to take back the throne was the entire purpose of that story and the character. It's like the kids from The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe or something. That was never the purpose of the scientist Shuri...one of the secondary characters of the movie... The comparison just doesn't even make any sense. It's one of the most random things you could come up with. No, I'm just replying to your question From back in January? This isn't even from Endgame not has anything to do with anyone's atrocities to begin with.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jun 4, 2019 12:51:47 GMT
Good times everybody. Kumbaya.
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Jun 4, 2019 15:33:39 GMT
Wait, is DC-Fan seriously using ‘Snow White and the Huntsman’ as a positive example?! ![(rofl)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/rofl.png) Okay, I haven’t seen that film myself, but given how bad Kristen Stewart apparently was in that film, I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s using it just to trash Marvel - like he always does.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jun 4, 2019 16:37:49 GMT
Wait, is DC-Fan seriously using ‘Snow White and the Huntsman’ as a positive example?! ![(rofl)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/rofl.png) Okay, I haven’t seen that film myself, but given how bad Kristen Stewart apparently was in that film, I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s using it just to trash Marvel - like he always does. I think it’s a Warner Brothers release.
|
|
|
Post by bud47 on Jun 4, 2019 16:48:59 GMT
You're not looking to have a healthy debate. You're just instigating for fun and feeding off of the frustration of others. No, I'm just answering scabab's question: "how does that devalue the female characters again?" by explaining how Black Panther devalues and demeans women by portraying them as incapable of standing up for themselves and being nothing more than helpless damsel-in-distress who needs a man to fight her battles for her. The question has been asked and answered multiple times on this thread and several others thanks to your repetitive nonsense. How many more times do we need to go through this tired debate before you feel satisfied? Come up with a new topic if you need the attention so badly.
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Jun 4, 2019 17:17:49 GMT
Yeah the topic pretty much run its course. Locking it up.
|
|