|
Post by taylorfirst1 on May 7, 2019 19:22:20 GMT
He has to be trolling because no one is this dense.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on May 7, 2019 19:30:24 GMT
He has to be trolling because no one is this dense. To keep yourself amused by running this routine every day for years, you'd have to be an emotional child. So either way...
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on May 7, 2019 19:30:36 GMT
That's irrelevant now since the Russos confirmed that Thanos replicated Pym particles for everyone on his ship. So as charzhino wrote, given that Thanos could replicate as many Pym particles as he needed, the Endgame final battle was really contrived and lazy writing. And as I pointed out in that thread, there's no reason for Thanos to go back in time when he can just confront the Avengers in their own time, knowing he's defeated them already. Thanos going back and retrieving the stones even farther in the past makes the story redundant and overly contrived. Just stop the Avengers in their timeline instead of hopping all over the place looking for the stones that you already had in the future. You guys are slow on the uptake but we're used to it by now. You're obviously slow because you completely missed charzhino 's point. Why the fuck would Thanos travel to the present, where the Avengers have possession of all the stones and Thanos doesn't have any stones, when he could just travel to the Past and gather the stones? If Napolean had the ability to time travel, do you think he would take his army to the past, where his army has the superior weapons over other countries in the past or do you think he would take his army to the future, where other countries in the future have superior weapons to his army? The writing in Endgame was just really lazy and contrived.
|
|
|
Post by sostie on May 7, 2019 19:34:52 GMT
What do the Pym particles do? Shrink a mass down to a size that can travel the Quantum Realm to a point in time. It uses the the same technology as the Ant Man suit...a technology which in turn could shrink items organic and non-organic. Cars & buildings and those contained within could be shrunk in the Ant Man films. The Pym Particles shrink a certain mass. I'm sure a Thanos "a supergenius in virtually all known fields of advanced science" as described in his biography, and Ebony Maw, a master of magic, could between them work out how to apply the shrinking to the larger mass of Thanos's ship. It doesn't matter what the size of something is, what is contained within or whether it is organic or in-organic. The particles reduce the mass it has been set to reduce. Which THEN allows them to travel the quantum realm That's irrelevant now since the Russos confirmed that Thanos replicated Pym particles for everyone on his ship. So as charzhino wrote, given that Thanos could replicate as many Pym particles as he needed, the Endgame final battle was really contrived and lazy writing. It's irrelevant because you got owned.
|
|
|
Post by sostie on May 7, 2019 19:36:01 GMT
And as I pointed out in that thread, there's no reason for Thanos to go back in time when he can just confront the Avengers in their own time, knowing he's defeated them already. Thanos going back and retrieving the stones even farther in the past makes the story redundant and overly contrived. Just stop the Avengers in their timeline instead of hopping all over the place looking for the stones that you already had in the future. You guys are slow on the uptake but we're used to it by now. You're obviously slow because you completely missed charzhino 's point. Why the fuck would Thanos travel to the present, where the Avengers have possession of all the stones and Thanos doesn't have any stones, when he could just travel to the Past and gather the stones? If Napolean had the ability to time travel, do you think he would take his army to the past, where his army has the superior weapons over other countries in the past or do you think he would take his army to the future, where other countries in the future have superior weapons to his army? The writing in Endgame was just really lazy and contrived. You really didn't pay attention or understand the film did you?
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on May 7, 2019 19:38:35 GMT
And as I pointed out in that thread, there's no reason for Thanos to go back in time when he can just confront the Avengers in their own time, knowing he's defeated them already. Thanos going back and retrieving the stones even farther in the past makes the story redundant and overly contrived. Just stop the Avengers in their timeline instead of hopping all over the place looking for the stones that you already had in the future. You guys are slow on the uptake but we're used to it by now. You're obviously slow because you completely missed charzhino 's point. Why the fuck would Thanos travel to the present, where the Avengers have possession of all the stones and Thanos doesn't have any stones, when he could just travel to the Past and gather the stones? If Napolean had the ability to time travel, do you think he would take his army to the past, where his army has the superior weapons over other countries in the past or do you think he would take his army to the future, where other countries in the future have superior weapons to his army? The writing in Endgame was just really lazy and contrived. I covered this already. Thanos doesn't know they have all the stones, only that they're attempting to get all the stones. Why would he go to the past to get all the stones when he already had them and completed his task in the future? All he needs to do now is defeat the Avengers, something he knows he's done already in the future. As an aside, I'd be willing to bet you don't know the definition of contrived.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on May 7, 2019 19:44:57 GMT
You're obviously slow because you completely missed charzhino 's point. Why the fuck would Thanos travel to the present, where the Avengers have possession of all the stones and Thanos doesn't have any stones, when he could just travel to the Past and gather the stones? If Napolean had the ability to time travel, do you think he would take his army to the past, where his army has the superior weapons over other countries in the past or do you think he would take his army to the future, where other countries in the future have superior weapons to his army? The writing in Endgame was just really lazy and contrived. I covered this already. Thanos doesn't know they have all the stones, only that they're attempting to get all the stones. Thanos knew the Avengers already had all the stones. Because Thanos' plan was to send Past Nebula to the future and steal the stones from the Avengers and then re-do the snap to wipe out 100% instead of 50%. Past Nebula can only steal the stones from the Avengers if the Avengers already had the stones. So Thanos knew the Avengers already had all the stones. So like charzhino wrote, it didn't make any sense at all for Thanos to take his army, without the stones, to the future where the Avengers already have all the stones. Since you didn't answer the question, I'll ask again: If Napolean had the ability to time travel, do you think he would take his army to the past, where his army has the superior weapons over other countries in the past or do you think he would take his army to the future, where other countries in the future have superior weapons to his army? The writing in Endgame was just really lazy and contrived.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on May 7, 2019 19:51:38 GMT
I covered this already. Thanos doesn't know they have all the stones, only that they're attempting to get all the stones. Thanos knew the Avengers already had all the stones. Because Thanos' plan was to send Past Nebula to the future and steal the stones from the Avengers and then re-do the snap to wipe out 100% instead of 50%. Past Nebula can only steal the stones from the Avengers if the Avengers already had the stones. So Thanos knew the Avengers already had all the stones. So like charzhino wrote, it didn't make any sense at all for Thanos to take his army, without the stones, to the future where the Avengers already have all the stones. Since you didn't answer the question, I'll ask again: If Napolean had the ability to time travel, do you think he would take his army to the past, where his army has the superior weapons over other countries in the past or do you think he would take his army to the future, where other countries in the future have superior weapons to his army? The writing in Endgame was just really lazy and contrived. No, Thanos plan was to have past Nebula bring him into the future so he could prevent the Avengers from undoing his master stroke. He became fed up with them and changed his plan to wiping them all out after the fact. Napoleon would take his army to the future where he already won, where he could kick his enemy in the face again. You're dumb.
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on May 7, 2019 20:03:45 GMT
Pym.particles were mass duplicated
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on May 7, 2019 20:05:35 GMT
Pym.particles were mass duplicated I told you this yesterday. I already posted the interview in another thread. Your fan fiction still sucks.
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on May 7, 2019 20:05:59 GMT
Pym.particles were mass duplicated I told you this yesterday. I already posted the interview in another thread. Your fan fiction still sucks. Irs come from the writers mouth lmao
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on May 7, 2019 20:09:12 GMT
I told you this yesterday. I already posted the interview in another thread. Your fan fiction still sucks. Irs come from the writers mouth lmao What does? I told you yesterday Thanos replicated the Pym particles. Your fan fiction-- the part where the film runs around in circles throughout time collecting stones to do something he already did instead of just confronting the Avengers (whom he doesn't know have all the stones and whom he's already beaten once), thereby doubling the runtime of the film and making Thanos look like an idiot-- still sucks.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on May 8, 2019 16:44:12 GMT
Cap brought tesseract back at the end. So Steve Rogers, who refused to sign the Accords (even after a team of Avengers under his command acted recklessly and caused the deaths of many innocent civilians) on the ridiculous claim that the UN can't be trusted because they might be infiltrated by HYDRA, yet at the end of Endgame Rogers goes to Vormir and willingly hands over the powerful Soul Stone to the Red Skull, who was a former leader of HYDRA? Like I said, Endgame makes no sense at all!
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on May 8, 2019 16:45:38 GMT
Cap brought tesseract back at the end. So Steve Rogers, who refused to sign the Accords (even after a team of Avengers under his command acted recklessly and caused the deaths of many innocent civilians) on the ridiculous claim that the UN can't be trusted because they might be infiltrated by HYDRA, yet at the end of Endgame Rogers goes to Vormir and willingly hands over the powerful Soul Stone to the Red Skull, who was a former leader of HYDRA? Like I said, Endgame makes no sense at all! Good one.
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on May 8, 2019 17:06:18 GMT
You're obviously slow because you completely missed charzhino 's point. Why the fuck would Thanos travel to the present, where the Avengers have possession of all the stones and Thanos doesn't have any stones, when he could just travel to the Past and gather the stones? If Napolean had the ability to time travel, do you think he would take his army to the past, where his army has the superior weapons over other countries in the past or do you think he would take his army to the future, where other countries in the future have superior weapons to his army? The writing in Endgame was just really lazy and contrived. You really didn't pay attention or understand the film did you? Either he went to the bathroom at the wrong time or he was watching an online copy so crappy, he couldn't tell what the hell was going on.
|
|
|
Post by poutinep on May 8, 2019 17:30:52 GMT
Cap brought tesseract back at the end. So Steve Rogers, who refused to sign the Accords (even after a team of Avengers under his command acted recklessly and caused the deaths of many innocent civilians) on the ridiculous claim that the UN can't be trusted because they might be infiltrated by HYDRA, yet at the end of Endgame Rogers goes to Vormir and willingly hands over the powerful Soul Stone to the Red Skull, who was a former leader of HYDRA? Like I said, Endgame makes no sense at all! "A lifetime ago, I too sought the stones. I even held one in my hand. But it cast me out, banished me here, guiding others to a treasure I cannot possess. "
Like everyone here said, you make no sense at all!
|
|
|
Post by dazz on May 8, 2019 21:33:12 GMT
You really didn't pay attention or understand the film did you? Either he went to the bathroom at the wrong time or he was watching an online copy so crappy, he couldn't tell what the hell was going on. Or option 3 he merely has the IQ of a twice lobotomised gibbon and there for cannot fathom anything beyond 1+1= duuuuuh?
My money is on option 3.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on May 13, 2019 3:57:06 GMT
So Steve Rogers, who refused to sign the Accords (even after a team of Avengers under his command acted recklessly and caused the deaths of many innocent civilians) on the ridiculous claim that the UN can't be trusted because they might be infiltrated by HYDRA, yet at the end of Endgame Rogers goes to Vormir and willingly hands over the powerful Soul Stone to the Red Skull, who was a former leader of HYDRA? Like I said, Endgame makes no sense at all! "A lifetime ago, I too sought the stones. I even held one in my hand. But it cast me out, banished me here, guiding others to a treasure I cannot possess. " Like everyone here said, you make no sense at all!
And we only have Red Skull's word for that. So Cap claims that the UN can't be trusted to have oversight over the Avengers because the UN is corrupt and infiltrated by HYDRA (even though there was no evidence presented at all that anyone in the UN was corrupt or associated in any way with HYDRA), yet Cap is willing to trust the word of the former leader of HYDRA that he can't possess the Soul Stone and just hand over the powerful Soul Stone to the former leader of HYDRA?Like I said, the Endgame makes no sense at all.
|
|
|
Post by poutinep on May 13, 2019 5:41:22 GMT
"A lifetime ago, I too sought the stones. I even held one in my hand. But it cast me out, banished me here, guiding others to a treasure I cannot possess. " Like everyone here said, you make no sense at all!
And we only have Red Skull's word for that. So Cap claims that the UN can't be trusted to have oversight over the Avengers because the UN is corrupt and infiltrated by HYDRA (even though there was no evidence presented at all that anyone in the UN was corrupt or associated in any way with HYDRA), yet Cap is willing to trust the word of the former leader of HYDRA that he can't possess the Soul Stone and just hand over the powerful Soul Stone to the former leader of HYDRA?Like I said, the Endgame makes no sense at all. So Red Skull just waited there for decades so he could lie to someone and...? What's his angle? Evidentially he didn't lie...he probably wasn't even able to lie due to the same force that bound him there. The movie give no indication that he's able to possess the stone. If Rogers is trusting anyone here, it's Barton.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on May 13, 2019 6:06:27 GMT
"A lifetime ago, I too sought the stones. I even held one in my hand. But it cast me out, banished me here, guiding others to a treasure I cannot possess. " Like everyone here said, you make no sense at all!
And we only have Red Skull's word for that. So Cap claims that the UN can't be trusted to have oversight over the Avengers because the UN is corrupt and infiltrated by HYDRA (even though there was no evidence presented at all that anyone in the UN was corrupt or associated in any way with HYDRA), yet Cap is willing to trust the word of the former leader of HYDRA that he can't possess the Soul Stone and just hand over the powerful Soul Stone to the former leader of HYDRA?Like I said, the Endgame makes no sense at all. Well Skull had not possessed the stone in all the time he had been on the planet, he also seemingly gained some weird magical powers iirc as wasn't he floating when Thanos arrived to get the stone in IW? that's not a side effect of the super serum that's a result of him being tied to the stone, how this happened isn't explained nor does it need to, they are stones which posses the power to reshape existence at a whim, that's good enough, also Skull never tries to take the stone either from Thanos or from Hawkeye, one he could easily overpower given he is a super soldier and the other is a mere mortal.
Also that's not Cap's position in CW, War Machine says it's the UN it isn't the WSC, SHIELD or HYDRA, it's the UN, and Steve point is yeah but it's run by people with agenda's and those agenda's shift, his point is flawed imo because he assumes if they agree to the accords then they give up their right to choose, which seems odd, surely they aren't being held hostage, fight for us or be a criminal, which is what they become after CW by continuing to act outside of oversight, rather it would simply be a case of they wont be forced into an action they don't agree with but they will not be allowed to take action without permission, I think they purposely blur the line to make Cap's stance seem less childish because really it does come down to Steve going I wont sign it because I wont be told what to do, so they instead make it about Steve not wanting to be used as a tool, which has nothing to do with him returning the stone, try again troll boy.
|
|