|
Post by damngumby on Mar 10, 2019 2:11:29 GMT
We'll find out soon enough if you're still crying about the RT score when IW End Game comes out in another month. Why would I care about that? The true voice of the people was captured by that 32%. There's no putting the genie back in the bottle now; the truth is out about Brie Larson's discriminatory comments and CM's bad RT score. You obviously care very much about the RT score. Afterall, you created this thread.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 10, 2019 2:04:36 GMT
Too bad you didn't go back six years. The Peyton Manning led Broncos SB against the Seahawks is one of the worst performances in Superbowl history.
... made all the worse when the Patriots kicked the Seahawks ass the following year.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 10, 2019 1:52:26 GMT
Another unsupported statement. If RT suddenly ceased to exist and I wanted to see what the top rated superhero movie is, I could go to MC and discover that it is ... Black Panther! I'd then notice that Ironman is a 9 points lower than BP and Logan is 11 points lower. WTH? Those movies are nearly as good as BP. Surely they should score within a few points of BP. And Aquaman at 55. I'd have to dismiss that one as just another failed DCEU endeavor, only marginally better than JL. Catwoman, Supergirl, Suicide Squad. The Metacritic score would suggest that there is some redeemable quality to those movies, when there really is none. There is a reason why RT is much more relevant than MC. I have shown you why. No doubt, this time next year you will still be whinning about the RT score and Metacritic will still be a bit player. Nice try, mang. But not good enough. RT is over. We'll find out soon enough if you're still crying about the RT score when IW End Game comes out in another month.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 10, 2019 1:44:23 GMT
I just find it funny that anyone would care about an audience score, before anyone had a chance to see it. I guess it could be used to measure the butt-hurt of angry rival fanboys. In which case, Captain Marvel is a grand slam home run! ... plus the fact it has an A Cinemascore! Audiences love it! Fanboys pout. Cinemascore has been totally and completely discredited. Dismissed. Debunked. If that were the case then it wouldn't be referred to by all the major publications. Your endless parade of conspiracies is both comical and tiresome. Are you taking lessons from Always Wrong?
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 9, 2019 23:09:09 GMT
I just find it funny that anyone would care about an audience score, before anyone had a chance to see it.
I guess it could be used to measure the butt-hurt of angry rival fanboys. In which case, Captain Marvel is a grand slam home run!
... plus the fact it has an A Cinemascore! Audiences love it! Fanboys pout.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 9, 2019 22:27:31 GMT
As real critics view Captain McMehrysue, not the shills who were invited to the premier 😂 Aquaman started off at 78. Ended at 65. Captain Marvel started at 86. Now at 79. You do the math.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 9, 2019 22:19:46 GMT
I genuinely wonder how one must lead their life to be so overjoyed over a movie’s Rotten Tomatoes’ score falling. Well, it's a little like how much pride and joy you presumably derive from an RT score rising or being high out of the gate. Innit? Actually, it's nothing like that. Hoping that a movie that you want to see is good, as reflected in a high RT score, is completely different than seething over a superhero franchise you hate and hoping that it's movies suck.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 9, 2019 21:36:06 GMT
CM Day 1-$61 mill WW Day 1-$38 mill. June opening. Summer WW Day 2-$35 mill. Yeah, but more idiots* predicted that Captain Marvel would not be able to beat Wonder Woman! That's a big win for Wonder Woman! * Like this one.
* ... and this one.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 9, 2019 21:31:27 GMT
That is not an argument. You have presented no facts in this thread, just your butt-hurt opinions. On the other hand, I have compared the RT and MC scores for a number of superhero movies and found the ranking to be in agreement for the top movies. The difference, RT scores them from 97 to 65 (32 pt differential) and MC scores them from 88 to 55 (33 pt differential). In fact, one could easily argue that the RT score is more inline with how people view these top movies when they give a 90+ score to the likes of BP, TDK, Logan and The Avengers instead of spreading the scores out over 19 points, like MC does. You compared them and then came to the opposite conclusion that the data supports because it suited your purposes. But it's irrelevant since nobody will ever take RT seriously again after the CM fiasco. Another unsupported statement. If RT suddenly ceased to exist and I wanted to see what the top rated superhero movie is, I could go to MC and discover that it is ... Black Panther! I'd then notice that Ironman is a 9 points lower than BP and Logan is 11 points lower. WTH? Those movies are nearly as good as BP. Surely they should score within a few points of BP. And Aquaman at 55. I'd have to dismiss that one as just another failed DCEU endeavor, only marginally better than JL. Catwoman, Supergirl, Suicide Squad. The Metacritic score would suggest that there is some redeemable quality to those movies, when there really is none. There is a reason why RT is much more relevant than MC. I have shown you why. No doubt, this time next year you will still be whinning about the RT score and Metacritic will still be a bit player.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 9, 2019 19:50:36 GMT
Sure, but an argument = an argument, and you didn't refute mine. RT is like a hysterical Brie Larson screaming at the top of her lungs and prone to ridiculous and irrational mood swings, whereas MC is obviously much more fair and balanced. That is not an argument. You have presented no facts in this thread, just your butt-hurt opinions. On the other hand, I have compared the RT and MC scores for a number of superhero movies and found the ranking to be in agreement for the top movies. The difference, RT scores them from 97 to 65 (32 pt differential) and MC scores them from 88 to 55 (33 pt differential). In fact, one could easily argue that the RT score is more inline with how people view these top movies when they give a 90+ score to the likes of BP, TDK, Logan and The Avengers instead of spreading the scores out over 19 points, like MC does.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 9, 2019 18:14:27 GMT
You appear to have a lingering case of extreme butt-hurt over the RT score for Black Panther. ... despite it being a Best Picture nominee ... and despite your estemed Metacritic scoring it higher than most Best Picture winners. Are exploding heads the final stage of your unfortunate affliction? Any chance you can get a video of that? Discussions reflecting your extreme butt-hurt over the 6x World Champions, NE Patriots should be confined to the sports board. The MCU board is already overflowing with butt-hurt from the superhero crowd. So basically you concede the argument. butt-hurt ≠ an argument
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 9, 2019 16:59:08 GMT
How many of those votes were real opinions from real people? Do you think it is fair? Would they be doing this if it was a DCU movie or Fox movie? The real question should be - how many of those votes were yours? Captain Marvel gets 58,000 votes when it has been out for only one day, while Infinity War gets 54,000 votes after being out for an entire year? Nothing to see here folks! Move along! This silly anti Captain Marvel campaign has failed miserably. It has been exposed, the perpetrators ridiculed, and CM is still going to be a monster success! It is time for all butt-hurt fanboys to return to their normal lives. ... unfortunately for most, that means seething over the next superhero movie from their parents basement.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 9, 2019 16:38:32 GMT
One would think that a best picture nominee and the best animated feature winner would be an A grade move. Not a B+, like Metacritic rates them. The Dark Knight is only a B grade movie? Really? Logan is a C? Uh ... no. I think your point has fallen ... and can't get up. Nah, it hasn't. Superhero movies aren't for everyone and were never taken seriously (nor should they have ever been) before like three years ago; those scores seem accurate for a site encompassing shit like Citizen Kane. If that's a "100," I'm fine with any of the scores you cited. Unlike the clownshoes nonsense of Black FUCKING Panther, a throwaway bullshit character portrayed terribly in a mediocre piece of shit film, getting a "97%," which is so manifestly ludicrous to any thinking person as almost cause one's head to explode. You'd have to basically have no context for anything or be the most gullible mark alive to find RT a more accurate reflection than MC. Wait, you're the guy still taking the Patriots' plainly tainted Super Bowl "wins" seriously even though everyone stopped giving a shit about the NFL years ago, yeah? And going so far as to actually boast and shit-talk to other people in public without feeling abject shame or disgrace? ETA This is starting to make sense... Innit? You appear to have a lingering case of extreme butt-hurt over the RT score for Black Panther. ... despite it being a Best Picture nominee ... and despite your estemed Metacritic scoring it higher than most Best Picture winners. Are exploding heads the final stage of your unfortunate affliction? Any chance you can get a video of that? Discussions reflecting your extreme butt-hurt over the 6x World Champions, NE Patriots should be confined to the sports board. The MCU board is already overflowing with butt-hurt from the superhero crowd.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 9, 2019 12:28:10 GMT
Holy Cow! Wasn't it just a week ago that some people were saying Captain Marvel was going to underperform and that no one wanted to see it? Once again the naysayers get crushed beneath the heel of the mighty MCU! Wonder Woman fans must be particularly disappointed that there is more interest in some obscure MCU female superhero than there was with their well known DC superhero.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 9, 2019 11:43:31 GMT
RT Score / Metacritic Score Black Panther 97/88 (nominated; Best Picture) Spiderman into the Spiderverse 97/87 (winner; Best Animated Feature) The Dark Knight 94/84 Ironman 93/79 Logan 93/77 Wonder Woman 93/76 (not nominated; for anything) Spiderman Homecoming 92/73 The Avengers 92/69 Captain Marvel 79/65 Aquaman 65/55 ........................ Justice League 40/45 BvS 27/44 Suicide Squad 27/40 Superman Quest for Peace 12/24 Supergirl 10/42 Catwoman 9/27 From best to worst, both rating systems are pretty much in line, with a relatively consistant deviation between the two rating systems. Except for the really crappy movies, where the scoring flips. Metacritic tends to rate the crap significantly higher than RT does. Are those the ones you are most interested in seeing? For sure?
Nice try, but you left out the other end of the spectrum; the complete picture is that Metacritic is more reasonable, ranging from the plausible low end of ~25-40% and a similarly credible high end of ~85%, in contrast to the ludicrous and goofball clownshoes MCU RT score range of fucking 10-97%, which is absurd nonsense touted by only the biggest rubes. ETA: So my point stands. Innit? One would think that a best picture nominee and the best animated feature winner would be an A grade move. Not a B+, like Metacritic rates them. The Dark Knight is only a B grade movie? Really? Logan is a C? Uh ... no. I think your point has fallen ... and can't get up.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 9, 2019 2:34:16 GMT
Metacritic is a better way to judge a movie I'm interested in seeing than RT for sure. RT Score / Metacritic Score Black Panther 97/88 (nominated; Best Picture) Spiderman into the Spiderverse 97/87 (winner; Best Animated Feature) The Dark Knight 94/84 Ironman 93/79 Logan 93/77 Wonder Woman 93/76 (not nominated; for anything) Spiderman Homecoming 92/73 The Avengers 92/69 Captain Marvel 79/65 Aquaman 65/55 ........................ Justice League 40/45 BvS 27/44 Suicide Squad 27/40 Superman Quest for Peace 12/24 Supergirl 10/42 Catwoman 9/27 From best to worst, both rating systems are pretty much in line, with a relatively consistant deviation between the two rating systems. Except for the really crappy movies, where the scoring flips. Metacritic tends to rate the crap significantly higher than RT does. Are those the ones you are most interested in seeing? For sure?
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 9, 2019 1:15:04 GMT
So this thread is all about a "msjority" that ended up being wrong.
Big win for DC fans everywhere!
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 6, 2019 23:20:25 GMT
Never, and I mean NEVER, has there been any scene like that in the MCU. The scene where Thor says "he's my brother"
"He killed 200 people yesterday"
"He's adopted"
is an example of that kind of humor. The drama of the moment is undermined by the punchline. There are other responses he could have made that were not humorous or intended to be.
That line was freakin' hilarious! If you're looking for a serious adult movie, avoid the ones where the protagonist wears anything that could be considered a costume.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 5, 2019 23:26:55 GMT
Despite all the MCU "PR disasters" recently, Captain Marvel opening weekend will easily soar past Wonder Woman.
Which will conclusively prove that the low RT want to see score was being manipulated by butt-hurt fanboys of inferior franchises. The same butt-hurt fanboys who were throwing a fit when RT took away their toy.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 5, 2019 23:14:05 GMT
Whats funny is look at the RT scores and consensus for: Aquaman 65% : Aquaman swims with its entertainingly ludicrous tide, offering up CGI superhero spectacle that delivers energetic action with an emphasis on good old-fashioned fun. Man of Steel 56% : Man of Steel's exhilarating action and spectacle can't fully overcome its detours into generic blockbuster territory. Captain Marvel 82%* : Packed with action, humor, and visual thrills, Captain Marvel introduces the MCU's latest hero with an origin story that makes effective use of the franchise's signature formula. See the disparity. Aquaman described as good old fashioned fun but barely gets fresh. Man of Steel is supposedly generic and gets rotten. Captain Marvel is described both fun and formulaic yet gets over 80%. All 3 have great action and visuals yet somehow cap marvels screenplay is superior? And nearly all of mcu films are generic blockbusters yet only MoS gets criticised for that. There is no neutrality Looks like the RT consensus summary was trying to boost Aquaman and Man of Steel, despite their middling reviews.
|
|